Thromboembolic disorders significantly impact global health, with over 10 million people worldwide affected by venous thromboembolism annually, resulting in a case fatality rate of about 20%. Cardioembolic stroke, another thromboembolic disorder and a severe complication of atrial fibrillation, affects approximately 33 million individuals globally. Anticoagulants are the first line of prevention or treatment for thromboembolic diseases (
1,
2). Traditional anticoagulants such as heparin and warfarin present challenges and limitations. Warfarin, as an oral anticoagulant, has an unfixed anticoagulation effect, interacts with a broad range of drugs and foods, and requires routine monitoring, complicating clinical practice. In response to these limitations, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) were introduced to the pharmaceutical market. The DOAs have fixed effect profiles without the need for routine monitoring (
3,
4).
Apixaban is a DOA that targets factor Xa in the coagulation cascade. It reversibly inhibits factor Xa coupled to platelets or inactivated Xa in the prothrombinase complex as the free factor Xa. Apixaban is prescribed for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients prone to blood coagulation, such as those hospitalized with acute illnesses or following major orthopedic surgery, as a stroke preventer in atrial fibrillation patients, or as a treatment for venous thrombosis. The recommended dose of apixaban is typically 2.5 to 10 mg twice a day (
5,
6).
Apixaban is available as immediate-release tablet formulations. It is primarily absorbed in the small intestine, and its absorption decreases as the drug molecules travel along the intestinal lumen. The oral bioavailability of apixaban tablets is about 50%. The maximum plasma concentration (C
max) is reached approximately 3 hours after oral administration (
7). Following oral administration of apixaban with food, drug exposure — i.e., area under curve (AUC) the plasma concentration-time and C
max — was comparable to that of the fasting state (
8). In the study by Song et al. (
9), administration of the whole tablet with food reduced C
max and AUC by 15% and 20%, respectively; however, these findings were not considered clinically significant. These researchers also investigated the bioavailability of apixaban from the crushed tablet. According to the results, the crushed tablet exhibited a decrease in apixaban exposure compared to the whole tablet (21% and 16% reduction in C
max and AUC, respectively), but it was not clinically significant (
9). It can be concluded that administration of apixaban with food or as a crushed tablet has no significant effect on its efficacy. Therefore, patients with swallowing difficulties can administer the tablet by crushing and dispersing it in water.
With a relatively low volume of distribution (0.3 L/kg), apixaban is primarily found in extracellular fluids and has a protein binding of 93%, with the highest affinity for albumin. Apixaban has a total plasma and renal clearance of 3.3 L/h and 0.9 L/h, respectively (the renal to total clearance ratio of the absorbed drug is about 27%). The elimination half-life (t
1/2) of apixaban is about 12 hours, and its elimination from the body occurs via various pathways, including metabolism [mainly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4] and excretion of the unmodified drug through the biliary and renal systems. With decreased renal function, t
1/2 and AUC increased; however, mild to moderate hepatic impairment had no discernible effect on the pharmacokinetic profile. Apixaban is not recommended for patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease or severe hepatic impairment. Apixaban is a substrate of both P-glycoprotein and CYP 3A4, and therefore its concurrent administration with powerful inducers or inhibitors of CYP 3A4 and the efflux carrier should be undertaken with caution (
7,
10). Further intrinsic factors such as age, sex, body weight, and race can slightly affect the pharmacokinetic parameters; however, clinical trials confirm that no dose adjustment of apixaban is needed in these situations (
10).
Bioequivalence studies are crucial for the development of generic drug products. The target of such studies is to evaluate the therapeutic compatibility of the brand/original and the generic products when administered at the identical molar dose of the active component under similar conditions. The basis of the bioequivalence assessment is the concept that a product's therapeutic profile is directly correlated with the active component’s concentration in the circulating blood. As a result, two therapeutic products are bioequivalent if their concentration-time profiles are similar enough to confer comparable clinical efficacy (
11,
12). Therefore, a comparison of the extent and rate of drug absorption following the administration of pharmaceutical equivalent products is essential to ensure the achievement of equal efficacy.