Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Practical Guide

authors:

avatar Urs Beat Schaad 1 , * , avatar Susanna Esposito 2 , avatar Cem Hasan Razi 3

Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University Children’s Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Major Policlinics Hospital, Pediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Ca’ Granda Fundation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Department of Pediatric Allergy, Acibadem Private Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

how to cite: Schaad U B, Esposito S, Razi C H. Diagnosis and Management of Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Practical Guide. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2016;4(1):e31039. https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.31039.

Abstract

Context:

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) affect children all over the world and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. RTIs are usually triggered by viruses, though bacterial infections are also common.

Results:

Children are particularly susceptible to RTIs due to the relative immaturity of their immune systems, and genetic factors (such as family history of atopy) and/or environmental factors (such as exposure to pollution and pathogens) also render certain populations more vulnerable to infection. Furthermore, RTIs tend to be recurrent and can result in multiple infections per year. The management of recurrent RTIs poses a tremendous challenge for physicians, who have a limited armamentarium with which to alleviate patients’ symptoms, treat their disease, and prevent recurrences.

Conclusions:

Though antibiotics are rarely indicated, they are often still used to treat RTIs. The resulting increase in bacterial resistance, the lack of treatment efficacy, and drug-related side effects all underscore the need for alternative strategies to manage recurrent RTIs. This article uses a typical pediatric case study to review central issues in the diagnosis and management of recurrent RTIs in children, with an emphasis on the role of immunomodulation as a preventive strategy.

1. Context

1.1. The Clinical Case

Fred is a three-year-old boy who was born prematurely. His mother, who is single and works full-time, reported to us that since starting kindergarten a year ago, Fred has experienced monthly acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) warranting medical attention and treatment. He is about to begin his final year of kindergarten, and his mother, who is affected by atopic eczema and asthma, is concerned about possible new acute RTIs and future complications. How should Fred’s case be managed?

1.2. Respiratory Tract Infections: Epidemiology and Burden of Disease

Worldwide, acute infections of the respiratory airways are associated with significant morbidity and mortality among pediatric patients (1). Recurrent RTIs are especially common in young children; in developed countries, they affect up to 25% of children under one year of age and 18% of children one to four years of age (2). In developing countries, RTIs are a leading cause of childhood mortality, resulting in over two million deaths per year (3, 4). Pediatric RTIs result in frequent complications that necessitate multiple medical visits (5-8). In developed countries such as Switzerland and Italy, nearly 50% of pediatric consultations are caused by RTIs (9-11) and in the United States, RTIs are among the leading causes of hospital admissions (12, 13). Despite the availability of healthcare in developed countries, RTIs nevertheless present a tremendous clinical and economic burden (14). Globally, recurrent pediatric RTIs pose a difficulty for patients’ families and a clinical challenge for treating physicians (Figure 1).

The Consequences of Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infections
The Consequences of Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infections

The main pathogens that trigger respiratory infections are viruses (such as the respiratory syncytial viruses, rhinoviruses, and influenza viruses) (15). Although viruses are often responsible for RTIs, bacterial super-infections commonly occur. Bacterial infections are observed in up to 60% of patients whose RTI symptoms last for 10 days or more (16). The most prevalent bacterial respiratory pathogens are species such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pyogenes (17). There is also evidence of a synergistic effect between viruses and bacteria in the pathogenesis of respiratory infections (18). A classic example is the synergism between influenza viruses and S. pneumonia (17). Although infection with influenza viruses alone may be fatal, mortality dramatically increases with a bacterial super-infection (17).

Several characteristics of RTIs contribute to the burden of illness. First, RTIs tend to recur in pediatric patients. The clinical sequelae of RTIs can result in long-term complications and further contribute to the disease burden, resulting in secondary infections, wheezing, and the development of asthma (6, 7). In the United States, pneumonia treatment costs an estimated $ 7 - 12 billion annually (12, 13). A recent Swiss study estimated that the overall cost associated with treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in children ages two months to 16 years was 11,258 CHF per episode, leading the authors to conclude that childhood pneumonia results in a significant medical cost burden that may be largely underestimated (19). Hospitalizations due to pediatric lower RTIs are especially pronounced in the winter months, thereby generating additional costs (20). This economic burden is projected to increase over the next 20 years, highlighting the importance of effective prevention strategies for reducing demands on the healthcare system (20). Pediatric RTIs require multiple medical visits and time spent at home for the patient and their caregivers, leading to school and/or work absenteeism and affecting the quality of life.

Another important consequence of pediatric RTIs stems from the fact that they are a leading cause of antibiotic prescriptions (21). Frequent antibiotic use, particularly for upper RTIs of viral origin, is common practice in ambulatory care (22, 23). Recent evidence shows that the number of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescriptions has increased even in cases for which no therapy is warranted or for which narrower-spectrum alternatives are appropriate (22, 23). It should be noted, however, that the appropriate tailoring of antibiotic agents may not always be possible in the primary care setting due to uncertainties in diagnosis and in identification of the infectious agent (24). Nevertheless, this misuse and overuse of antibiotics results in unnecessary drug-related adverse events, (25) contributes to antibiotic resistance and increased clinical failure, and incurs further medical costs (26, 27).

1.3. Recurrent RTIs: Definitions and Diagnosis

The most commonly used definition of respiratory tract infection is any upper or lower respiratory disease and any respiratory illness associated with fever (axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C or rectal temperature ≥ 38°C) (28). Symptoms normally include at least one of the following: runny nose, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, earache, wheezing, and/or shortness of breath lasting at least two to three days or more. Recurrent episodes should be separated by at least a two-week period with no symptoms.

RTIs may be further classified into those that affect the upper or lower respiratory tracts. The majority of RTIs affect the upper respiratory tract, presenting as the common cold, tonsillitis, pharyngitis, laryngitis, rhinosinusitis, and otitis media. Although infections involving the upper respiratory tract are self-limiting and can be managed, infections of the lower respiratory tissues (tracheitis, bronchiolitis/bronchitis, and pneumonia) can have serious consequences that may lead to hospitalization and/or death (29). Thus, children like Fred who present with RTI symptoms are a diagnostic challenge. It is necessary to distinguish between patients for whom RTI symptoms have an uncomplicated cause (such as a viral infection) and those whose symptoms reflect a more serious underlying pathology (such as bronchiectasis or immune dysfunction) predisposing the patient to respiratory infections (30). Notably, there are several disorders (which may or may not be caused by a primary infection) whose symptoms resemble those of RTIs (Table 1) (31). The early symptoms of infection with measles and chickenpox are similar to those of RTIs (31). Another mimic is allergic rhinitis, characterized by excessive lacrimation and itchy eyes and manifested seasonally or following exposure to specific allergens. Sore throat may be indicative of acute thyroiditis, Ludwig’s angina, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, all of which should be differentiated from pharyngitis (31). Exclusion of pneumonia is a key diagnostic step when evaluating a patient with acute tracheobronchitis (31). If a cough lasts more than three weeks, then postnasal drip, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux disease are the most likely causes (Table 1) (31). Therefore, the diagnosis of recurrent RTIs poses a clinical and diagnostic challenge with important implications for management strategies, as the role of the physician has evolved from disease treatment to health maintenance and disease prevention. A diagnostic algorithm for acute and recurrent pediatric RTIs is shown in Figure 2.

Table 1.

Differential Diagnosis Between Respiratory Tract Infections (RTIs) and Other Diseases With Similar Symptoms (31)

DiseaseSymptoms That Resemble RTIs
Measles, chickenpoxSimilar symptoms to the common cold
Allergic rhinitisItchy eyes, excessive lacrimation
Acute thyroiditis, Ludwig’s angina, gastroesophageal reflux disease, drug-induced mucositisSore throat (pharyngitis)
Wegener’s granulomatosisSinusitis
Postnasal drip, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux diseaseCough
Diagnosis of Acute and Recurrent Pediatric RTIs
Diagnosis of Acute and Recurrent Pediatric RTIs

Another difficulty is that there is no universal consensus on the definition of recurrent childhood RTIs. Furthermore, the number of episodes that are used to define recurrence varies according to the disease and severity. The most widely accepted definition is the occurrence of eight or more documented airway infections per year in preschool-aged children (up to three years of age), or of six or more in children older than three years of age, in the absence of any underlying pathological condition (32). Other definitions have been reported in the literature, such as three or more episodes per fall-winter period or over the course of six months (for two consecutive years) (33). Otitis media is considered recurrent if the patient experiences three episodes in six months or four episodes in 12 months, whereas infectious rhinitis is defined as recurrent if more than five episodes occur per year (34, 35). Pharyngitis or tonsillitis are considered recurrent if more than three episodes have been treated within a 12-month period (2, 34). Finally, infections of the lower respiratory tract are considered recurrent if more than three episodes occur within 12 months (36, 37). It is estimated that 10% - 15% of children experience recurrent RTIs (38). Our case study, Fred, likely falls into the category of preschool children with recurrent RTIs.

1.4. What are the Risk Factors for Recurrent RTIs?

Compared to healthy adults, infants and young children are at increased risk of recurrent RTIs due to the relative immaturity of their immune system. Humoral and cellular immunity do not mature until the fifth or sixth year of life (37, 39, 40) and the infant immune system is characterized by immature immune cell function and activation as well as an imbalance towards Th2 cytokines (41, 42). Immunoglobulin (IgG) subclass deficiency is often observed in young children, and 57% of children who have recurrent RTIs are deficient in one of the Ig subclasses, particularly IgG2 (29). Deficiencies of secretory IgA, alone or in combination with IgG subclass deficiency, also predispose an individual to recurrent RTIs (43). However, since the majority of these children do not have an underlying immunodeficiency (a rare condition), these findings reflect a transient immaturity of the developing immune system that results in greater susceptibility to RTIs (2, 29). Other unmodifiable risk factors are the presence of allergies, a family history of atopy, premature birth, and craniofacial abnormalities (Box 1) (30, 37, 44, 45).

Box 1.

Main Risk Factors for Respiratory Tract Infections in Children (29,44-51)

Physiological and genetic risk factors
Family history of atopy
Presence of allergies, atopy
Low birth weight or premature birth
Physiological abnormalities of the airways
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
Male gender
Craniofacial abnormalities
Environmental risk factors
Reduction or lack of breastfeeding
Attendance at daycare centers and early socialization
Large family size, school-aged siblings, overcrowding
Parental smoking, smoking during pregnancy
Malnutrition
Missing vaccinations
Physical stress, intense physical exertion
Climate and environmental factors (exposure to pollution)
Dampness in the home environment
Use of pacifiers
Bottle feeding in the prone position

With his family history of atopy and the fact that he was born prematurely, Fred is at increased risk of RTIs compared to children who do not share these risk factors. RTIs occur more frequently during the winter months, partly due to overcrowding. Transmission of pathogens that cause RTIs occurs via aerosolized droplets or direct contact with contaminated secretions, with subsequent invasion of the eyes or respiratory epithelium (52). Thus, crowded conditions (such as schools and daycare centers) favor the transmission of respiratory pathogens (53, 54). Fred’s attendance at Kindergarten is an additional factor that puts him at risk of RTIs. Exposure to environmental factors such as air pollution and passive smoking are additional risk factors that can predispose a child toward RTIs (Box 1) (55). Other modifiable risk factors include pacifier use and bottle feeding in the prone position (Box 1) (46-48).

1.5. Recurrent RTIs: Rationale for Prevention

Recurrent infections of the respiratory tissues may result in virus-induced immune dysfunction and can lead to a vicious cycle of recurrent RTIs with bacterial super-infections, exacerbation of cough, and increased risk of asthma development (56-58). In preschool-aged children, RTIs are also a main trigger of recurrent wheezing attacks (49). Wheezing attacks are defined as an episode of progressively increasing shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, chest retraction (or a combination of these symptoms) lasting a minimum of six hours in an individual with a normal chest radiographic examination (56). Furthermore, amongst viral wheezing illnesses in infancy and early childhood, those caused by rhinovirus infections are the most significant predictors of subsequent asthma development in later childhood (59). The widespread use of antibiotics for the treatment of RTIs is associated with adverse effects for the patient and a growing rate of clinical failure due to the rise of antibiotic resistance (25-27). Thus, there is an urgent medical need for a multi-faceted management strategy for recurrent RTIs that not only ameliorates the clinical burden, but also breaks the vicious cycle of viral and bacterial mucosal colonization, inflammation, and defective immune response.

1.6. Improved Management of Recurrent RTIs: A Practical Guide for Physicians

1.6.1. Parental Education and Awareness

Raising awareness among parents of the modifiable risk factors for recurrent RTIs can play a large role in prevention (29). Parents, but in particular mothers, should be educated on the benefits of breastfeeding. A child’s exposure to passive smoking and indoor/outdoor pollution are other risk factors within parental control. Furthermore, it is important to inform parents that surgical approaches (including tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy) are not appropriate solutions for reducing recurrent RTIs for the majority of children, as they may confer only modest benefits that need to be weighed against the risks and potential complications (60, 61).

1.6.2. Active Immunizations

The ultimate goal of vaccination is to provide effective, active immunization against a specific pathogen. Vaccines exist for the common influenza viruses, measles, pertussis (Bordetella pertussis), the potentially invasive bacteria Haemophilus influenzae type b, and many serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae. These effective and well-tolerated vaccines are widely used for the prevention of these diseases.

Routine influenza vaccination is recommended for anyone older than six months of age who is without contra-indications, including children and adolescents (although the specific recommendations may vary between countries) (62). Ideally, the vaccination should be performed before the onset of influenza within the community (in the autumn months, if possible), and vaccinations should be offered as long as influenza viruses are circulating (63). Children between six months and eight years of age require two doses, and should receive their first dose as soon as possible after the vaccine is made available. The second dose should be given at least four weeks later (63). The influenza vaccine would be highly recommended for Fred, provided that he does not have any of the characteristics listed as contra-indications (such as previous allergic reaction to the vaccine or its excipients, egg allergy, wheezing, or asthma). A more complete list of contra-indications is reviewed elsewhere (63, 64).

There are several types of influenza vaccines. The oldest are based on inactivated viruses designed for intramuscular use and have been around for more than 50 years (65). Both the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) have been proven effective in children (63). Widespread administration of the vaccine in school-aged children in advance of an epidemic results not only in cross-protection for recipients, but also in indirect (herd) protection for the community (66). Unfortunately, the immunogenicity and efficacy of conventional IIVs have not been completely satisfactory in younger children, and more effective preparations such as LAIV or inactivated adjuvanted influenza vaccines are not yet licensed for use in all countries (65, 67, 68). Moreover, frequent mutations in key viral proteins decrease the efficacy of the annual influenza vaccine and augment viral resistance against standard antiviral agents (69). Finally, the major limiting factor for vaccines is the presence of hundreds of different viral serotypes, rendering it impossible to create a vaccine for each individual pathogen (70). Therefore, although routine influenza vaccination should be recommended, there remains a need for other strategies to limit RTIs particularly those caused by pathogens not covered by vaccines.

1.6.3. Alternative Strategies for Prevention of RTIs: Immunostimulation/Immunomodulation

For recurrent RTIs, preventive strategies are a cornerstone of clinical management, as these provide a means to interrupt the vicious cycle of microbial infection, repeated mucosal inflammation due to the interaction between microbes and the host’s first-line immune defense, and defective immune response (71, 72). Immunostimulants (also known as immunomodulators or immune enhancers) are effective complementary measures that can be used alongside vaccines to enhance or modulate the patient’s innate immune response. By preventing further infection, immunostimulants have beneficial effects on long-term patient outcomes (71, 72). Unlike vaccines, which stimulate immunity against a specific antigen, they act non-specifically to induce a “pre-alert” state in the host and to augment the general immune response. Due to the ability of some immunostimulants to trigger immune responses against respiratory pathogens, they are particularly suitable for children (for whom these immune functions are still maturing) (71, 72).

There are several different types of immunostimulants available, including immunomodulatory bacterial lysates (i.e., OM-85), herbal extracts (i.e., echinacea and garlic), thymic extracts (i.e., thymomodulin), and synthetic compounds (i.e., pidotimod) (73). The use of bacterial lysates (immunomodulators) to enhance non-specific immunity is shifting to the forefront of preventive strategies for recurrent RTIs. Bacterial lysate immunostimulants were first introduced in the 1980s and are the most widely studied. Although the mechanisms of action of other types of immunostimulants are poorly understood, there is evidence that bacterial lysates activate immune cells via pattern recognition receptors (PRR) such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which play a key role in pathogen recognition (74-76). PRRs bind to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are characteristic of many bacteria, resulting in stimulation of the innate immune response. This triggers activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), the production of cytokines and chemokines, increased phagocytic cell recruitment, and the eventual stimulation of adaptive immunity (such as T-cell and polyclonal B-cell maturation and antibody production) (77, 78). In this manner, ingestion of the appropriate bacterial lysates can stimulate the innate and adaptive immune responses and can enhance the natural process of immune system maturation.

1.6.4. How Can We Select the Appropriate/Immunomodulator?

The broad array of available immunostimulants makes it difficult for physicians to select the appropriate agent. An additional difficulty is that not all immunostimulants are supported by robust clinical data demonstrating efficacy and safety in the pediatric population. When faced with such a choice, the use of systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide a useful framework to guide clinical decision-making.

Cochrane meta-analyses have assessed the safety and efficacy of immunostimulants in preventing acute RTIs in children (first published in 2006 and recently updated in 2012) (73, 79). The results of these analyses indicated that compared to placebo, the use of certain agents could reduce the incidence of acute RTIs in susceptible children. The ones that were evaluated in the Cochrane reviews included bacterial products, herbal extracts (echinacea and garlic), synthetic compounds, and thymomodulin. The meta-analyses called attention to the fact that the overall quality of clinical trials was generally poor and that results were subject to high statistical heterogeneity (73). One exception however, was the bacterial lysate immunomodulator OM-85, the agent supported by the most high-quality (A-grade) clinical studies as judged by the Cochrane criteria (documentation of randomization, blinding, efficacy, and safety, including follow-up) (73). When pooling the results of the nine assessed OM-85 studies (four of these nine trials were deemed to be of grade-A quality), the Cochrane review reported a mean reduction in the number of acute RTIs of -1.20 [95% CI:-1.75, -0.66] and a percentage difference in acute RTIs of -35.9% [95% CI: -49.46, -22.35] when compared to placebo (73). The conclusions from the Cochrane analyses have been supported by other independent meta-analyses (33, 80). A systematic review of eight double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with OM-85 showed that treatment with OM-85 significantly reduced the incidence of RTIs in children suffering from recurrent RTIs (33). Of the population of children receiving OM-85, 32% experienced recurrent RTIs as compared to 58.2% in the placebo population (P < 0.001). Importantly, the efficacy of OM-85 appeared to be higher in a sub-population of patients with the highest number of RTIs in the year prior to starting the study. These findings are supported by several other clinical studies, indicating increased clinical benefit with the use of OM-85 in patients at higher risk of recurrent RTIs (33, 81-84).

1.6.5. Is Fred a Good Candidate for Prevention of Recurrent RTIs With an Oral Bacterial Immunomodulator?

Due to his genetic predisposition (family history of atopy), Fred himself is at risk of atopy and asthma. Additional factors such as his preterm birth, young age, and attendance at kindergarten renders him vulnerable to RTIs. It is important, therefore, to minimize Fred’s chances of RTIs, particularly those caused by viruses associated with wheezing attacks and increased risk of developing asthma in later childhood (59). Razi et al. (49) investigated the effects of OM-85 on wheezing attacks in children aged one to six years who experienced three or more acute wheezing attacks induced by RTIs in the previous six months. Children who received OM-85 had significantly fewer wheezing attacks (a 37.9% reduction in the OM-85 group as compared to the placebo group; P < 0.001), a reduced number of RTIs (a 31.4% reduction in mean incidence; P < 0.001), and a reduced incidence of nasopharyngitis (a 37.5% reduction in mean incidence; P < 0.001) over the 12-month study period. In addition, the authors observed that the beneficial effects of OM-85 were maintained for nine months after ending treatment (49).

Fred’s clinical characteristics resemble those of the study population in a randomized, placebo-controlled study testing the effects of OM-85 in children with recurrent upper RTIs (81). The 232 children enrolled in the study were between three and eight years old and had a history of recurrent RTIs. Treatment with OM-85 resulted in a 16% reduction in RTIs over a six-month period, with the greatest treatment effect seen in children who experienced three or more upper RTIs during the study period (81). The efficacy of OM-85 in reducing the incidence of RTIs has been demonstrated independently in several at-risk pediatric populations, including those exposed to pollution, (55) those living in an orphanage (83) and those with Ig subclass deficiency (in whom OM-85 does not affect clinical or laboratory markers of autoimmunity) (85). Altogether, these findings indicate that OM-85 has a good safety profile and is well-tolerated by the pediatric population. Though there is no formal contra-indication, as a general precaution OM-85 should not be administered to children younger than six months of age, since there is not sufficient treatment data for this sub-population.

The timing of the administration of OM-85 coincides with the timing of the influenza vaccine, and therefore one concern is whether the co-administration of OM-85 affects the efficacy and safety of the influenza vaccine. Esposito et al. tested the effects of OM-85 on the humoral and cellular responses against the IIV in 68 children who experienced recurrent RTIs (86). Results from this study showed that the use of OM-85 had no effect on humoral or cell-mediated immunity against the IIV. A secondary finding was that the group who received OM-85 in addition to the IIV had significantly reduced respiratory morbidity compared to the group that received the IIV alone. The OM-85 plus IIV group also had a significantly reduced consumption of antibiotics for RTIs and significantly reduced school absenteeism (86).

Given Fred’s clinical characteristics, the available evidence supports the use of the IIV alongside oral bacterial lysates such as OM-85 as part of a strategy for limiting the occurrence of his RTIs. The preventive effects of immunomodulators such as OM-85 may have a positive impact not only on quality of life for Fred and his mother, but also on the costs of healthcare and indirect societal costs (e.g., his mother’s absenteeism from work) (87). Furthermore, immunomodulators such as OM-85 are given orally and are therefore easy to administer to children. A management algorithm for pediatric RTIs is given in Figure 3.

Management Algorithm for Acute and Recurrent Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infections
Management Algorithm for Acute and Recurrent Pediatric Respiratory Tract Infections

2. Conclusions

Pediatric RTIs are a clinical and economic burden for patients and their families around the world. Respiratory infections tend to recur and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in young children. For treating physicians, recurrent RTIs pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In light of growing antibiotic resistance and limited efficacy of antibiotics as a long-term treatment option for patients with recurring RTIs, physicians have few options available to them. Preventive strategies are moving to the forefront as part of a holistic effort to minimize the incidence of RTIs and limit their sequelae. Well-established immunomodulators such OM-85 could play a key role in augmenting the limited armamentarium for physicians regularly facing the problem of recurrent pediatric respiratory infections. Though OM-85 has been licensed for use since 1987 and is supported by a large body of clinical research, recent evidence highlights the potential of this agent to be used not only for prevention of respiratory infections but also as an immunomodulator in at-risk populations (33, 81-84).

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Ferkol T, Schraufnagel D. The global burden of respiratory disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(3):404-6. [PubMed ID: 24673696]. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-405PS.

  • 2.

    Bellanti JA. Recurrent respiratory tract infections in paediatric patients. Drugs. 1997;54 Suppl 1:1-4. [PubMed ID: 9378072].

  • 3.

    Rudan I, Boschi-Pinto C, Biloglav Z, Mulholland K, Campbell H. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(5):408-16. [PubMed ID: 18545744].

  • 4.

    Wardlaw T, Salama P, Johansson EW, Mason E. Pneumonia: the leading killer of children. Lancet. 2006;368(9541):1048-50. [PubMed ID: 16997649]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69334-3.

  • 5.

    Wald ER, Guerra N, Byers C. Upper respiratory tract infections in young children: duration of and frequency of complications. Pediatrics. 1991;87(2):129-33. [PubMed ID: 1987522].

  • 6.

    Mistry RD, Fischer JB, Prasad PA, Coffin SE, Alpern ER. Severe complications in influenza-like illnesses. Pediatrics. 2014;134(3):e684-90. [PubMed ID: 25092942]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0505.

  • 7.

    Szabo SM, Gooch KL, Korol EE, Bradt P, Mitchell I, Vo P, et al. A population-based study of childhood respiratory morbidity after severe lower respiratory tract infections in early childhood. J Pediatr. 2014;165(1):123-128 e3. [PubMed ID: 24725580]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.053.

  • 8.

    Neuman MI, Hall M, Gay JC, Blaschke AJ, Williams DJ, Parikh K, et al. Readmissions among children previously hospitalized with pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2014;134(1):100-9. [PubMed ID: 24958590]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0331.

  • 9.

    Eggenberger K. Respiratory tract infections most frequently seen in pediatric outpatient care. Ars Medici. 1993;83:24-40.

  • 10.

    Esposito S, Principi N, Italian Society of P, Italian Society of Pediatric I, Italian Society of Pediatric A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and subacute rhinosinusitis in children. J Chemother. 2008;20(2):147-57. [PubMed ID: 18467238]. https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2008.20.2.147.

  • 11.

    Kvaerner KJ, Nafstad P, Jaakkola JJ. Upper respiratory morbidity in preschool children: a cross-sectional study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(10):1201-6. [PubMed ID: 11031406].

  • 12.

    Thomas CP, Ryan M, Chapman JD, Stason WB, Tompkins CP, Suaya JA, et al. Incidence and cost of pneumonia in medicare beneficiaries. Chest. 2012;142(4):973-81. [PubMed ID: 22406959]. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-1160.

  • 13.

    Colice GL, Morley MA, Asche C, Birnbaum HG. Treatment costs of community-acquired pneumonia in an employed population. Chest. 2004;125(6):2140-5. [PubMed ID: 15189934].

  • 14.

    Zar HJ, Ferkol TW. The global burden of respiratory disease-impact on child health. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(5):430-4. [PubMed ID: 24610581]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.23030.

  • 15.

    Khattab A, Shaheen M, Kamel T, El Faramay A, El Rahman SA, Nabil D, et al. Burden of pediatric influenza A virus infection post swine-flu H1N1 pandemic in Egypt. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2013;6(9):693-8. [PubMed ID: 23827145]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(13)60120-0.

  • 16.

    Salami A, Dellepiane M, Crippa B, Mora F, Guastini L, Jankowska B, et al. Sulphurous water inhalations in the prophylaxis of recurrent upper respiratory tract infections. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(11):1717-22. [PubMed ID: 18817987]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.08.014.

  • 17.

    McCullers JA. Insights into the interaction between influenza virus and pneumococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(3):571-82. [PubMed ID: 16847087]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00058-05.

  • 18.

    Bosch AA, Biesbroek G, Trzcinski K, Sanders EA, Bogaert D. Viral and bacterial interactions in the upper respiratory tract. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(1). eee1003057. [PubMed ID: 23326226]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003057.

  • 19.

    Keitel K, Alcoba G, Lacroix L, Manzano S, Galetto-Lacour A, Gervaix A. Observed costs and health care use of children in a prospective cohort study on community-acquired pneumonia in Geneva, Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2014;144:w13925. [PubMed ID: 24706389]. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2014.13925.

  • 20.

    Santibanez P, Gooch K, Vo P, Lorimer M, Sandino Y. Acute care utilization due to hospitalizations for pediatric lower respiratory tract infections in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:451. [PubMed ID: 23217103]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-451.

  • 21.

    Hersh AL, Jackson MA, Hicks LA, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious D. Principles of judicious antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2013;132(6):1146-54. [PubMed ID: 24249823]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-3260.

  • 22.

    Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Griffin MR. Antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections in US ambulatory settings. JAMA. 2009;302(7):758-66. [PubMed ID: 19690308]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1163.

  • 23.

    Hersh AL, Shapiro DJ, Pavia AT, Shah SS. Antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory pediatrics in the United States. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):1053-61. [PubMed ID: 22065263]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1337.

  • 24.

    Sanchez GV, Roberts RM, Albert AP, Johnson DD, Hicks LA. Effects of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care providers on antibiotic selection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(12):2041-7. [PubMed ID: 25418868]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2012.140331.

  • 25.

    Cohen AL, Budnitz DS, Weidenbach KN, Jernigan DB, Schroeder TJ, Shehab N, et al. National surveillance of emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2008;152(3):416-21. [PubMed ID: 18280852]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.07.041.

  • 26.

    Costelloe C, Metcalfe C, Lovering A, Mant D, Hay AD. Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:c2096. [PubMed ID: 20483949]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2096.

  • 27.

    Piovani D, Clavenna A, Sequi M, Cartabia M, Bortolotti A, Fortino I, et al. Reducing the costs of paediatric antibiotic prescribing in the community by implementing guideline recommendations. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013;38(5):373-8. [PubMed ID: 23611435]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12068.

  • 28.

    Davies A. Fever in children. Nurs Stand. 2014;29(1):61. [PubMed ID: 25182924]. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.29.1.61.s51.

  • 29.

    Schaad UB, Principi N. The management of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children. Europ Infect Dis. 2012;6(2):111-5.

  • 30.

    Jesenak M, Babusikova E, Ciljakova M, Banovcin P, Rennerova Z. Recurrent respiratory infections in children-definition, diagnostic approach, treatment and prevention. INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2011.

  • 31.

    Mossad SB. Upper Respiratory Tract Infections. 2013. Available from: http://www clevelandclinicmeded com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/infectious-disease/upper-respiratory-tract-infection/Default htm#top 2013.

  • 32.

    Korppi M. Recurrent respiratory infections in children: a practical approach for clinical work. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl. 1997;16:144-5. [PubMed ID: 9443246].

  • 33.

    Schaad UB. OM-85 BV, an immunostimulant in pediatric recurrent respiratory tract infections: a systematic review. World J Pediatr. 2010;6(1):5-12. [PubMed ID: 20143206]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-010-0001-x.

  • 34.

    Graham NM. The epidemiology of acute respiratory infections in children and adults: a global perspective. Epidemiol Rev. 1990;12:149-78. [PubMed ID: 2286216].

  • 35.

    Teele DW, Klein JO, Rosner B. Epidemiology of otitis media during the first seven years of life in children in greater Boston: a prospective, cohort study. J Infect Dis. 1989;160(1):83-94. [PubMed ID: 2732519].

  • 36.

    Recurrent infections in children: definition and diagnostic approach. Rev Immunol Allerg Pediatr. 1988;2:127-34.

  • 37.

    Wheeler JG. Evaluating the child with recurrent infections. Am Fam Physician. 1996;54(7):2276-82. [PubMed ID: 8940960].

  • 38.

    Kilic SS. Recurrent respiratory tract infection. Recent advances in pediatrics. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2004. p. 1-18.

  • 39.

    Yang KD, Hill HR. Neutrophil function disorders: Pathophysiology, prevention, and therapy. J Pediatr. 1991;119(3):343-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82044-x.

  • 40.

    Wheeler JG, Steiner D. Evaluation of humoral responsiveness in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992;11(4):304-10. [PubMed ID: 1565555].

  • 41.

    Diesner SC, Forster-Waldl E, Olivera A, Pollak A, Jensen-Jarolim E, Untersmayr E. Perspectives on immunomodulation early in life. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(3):210-23. [PubMed ID: 22299601]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01259.x.

  • 42.

    Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Gu W, He L, Sun B. Th1/Th2 cell's function in immune system. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;841:45-65. [PubMed ID: 25261204]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9487-9_3.

  • 43.

    Genel F, Kutukculer N. Prospective, randomized comparison of OM-85 BV and a prophylactic antibiotic in children with recurrent infections and immunoglobulin A and/or G subclass deficiency. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003;64(8):600-15. [PubMed ID: 24944407]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.curtheres.2003.09.008.

  • 44.

    Fete T. Respiratory problems in patients with ectodermal dysplasia syndromes. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(10):2478-81. [PubMed ID: 24842607]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36600.

  • 45.

    Torres LC, Sugayama SM, Arslanian C, Sales MM, Carneiro-Sampaio M. Evaluation of the immune humoral response of Brazilian patients with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2010;43(12):1215-24. [PubMed ID: 21085895].

  • 46.

    Froom J, Culpepper L, Green LA, de Melker RA, Grob P, Heeren T, et al. A cross-national study of acute otitis media: risk factors, severity, and treatment at initial visit. Report from the International Primary Care Network (IPCN) and the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN). J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14(6):406-17. [PubMed ID: 11757882].

  • 47.

    Kim HY, Han Y, Pyun Y, Kim J, Ahn K, Lee SI. Prolonged bedtime bottle feeding and respiratory symptoms in infants. Asia Pac Allergy. 2011;1(1):30-5. [PubMed ID: 22053294]. https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2011.1.1.30.

  • 48.

    Salah M, Abdel-Aziz M, Al-Farok A, Jebrini A. Recurrent acute otitis media in infants: analysis of risk factors. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(10):1665-9. [PubMed ID: 23953241]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.022.

  • 49.

    Razi CH, Harmanci K, Abaci A, Ozdemir O, Hizli S, Renda R, et al. The immunostimulant OM-85 BV prevents wheezing attacks in preschool children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(4):763-9. [PubMed ID: 20920766]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.038.

  • 50.

    Narinesingh SP, Whitby DJ, Davenport PJ. Moraxella catarrhalis: an unrecognized pathogen of the oral cavity? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(4):462-4. [PubMed ID: 20815726]. https://doi.org/10.1597/09-054.

  • 51.

    Savitha MR, Nandeeshwara SB, Pradeep Kumar MJ, ul-Haque F, Raju CK. Modifiable risk factors for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74(5):477-82. [PubMed ID: 17526960].

  • 52.

    Musher DM. How contagious are common respiratory tract infections? N Engl J Med. 2003;348(13):1256-66. [PubMed ID: 12660390]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra021771.

  • 53.

    Aymard M, Chomel JJ, Allard JP, Thouvenot D, Honegger D, Floret D, et al. Epidemiology of viral infections and evaluation of the potential benefit of OM-85 BV on the virologic status of children attending day-care centers. Respiration. 1994;61 Suppl 1:24-31. [PubMed ID: 7800968].

  • 54.

    Jara-Perez JV, Berber A. Primary prevention of acute respiratory tract infections in children using a bacterial immunostimulant: a double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Ther. 2000;22(6):748-59. [PubMed ID: 10929921]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(00)90008-0.

  • 55.

    Gutierrez-Tarango MD, Berber A. Safety and efficacy of two courses of OM-85 BV in the prevention of respiratory tract infections in children during 12 months. Chest. 2001;119(6):1742-8. [PubMed ID: 11399700].

  • 56.

    de Martino M, Ballotti S. The child with recurrent respiratory infections: normal or not? Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007;18 Suppl 18:13-8. [PubMed ID: 17767600]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00625.x.

  • 57.

    Li Volti G, Malaponte G, Bevelacqua V, Messina A, Bianca S, Mazzarino MC, et al. Persistent high plasma levels of interleukins 18 and 4 in children with recurrent infections of the upper respiratory tract. Transplant Proc. 2003;35(8):2911-5. [PubMed ID: 14697936].

  • 58.

    Dales RE, Schweitzer I, Toogood JH, Drouin M, Yang W, Dolovich J, et al. Respiratory infections and the autumn increase in asthma morbidity. Eur Respir J. 1996;9(1):72-7. [PubMed ID: 8834337].

  • 59.

    Jackson DJ, Gangnon RE, Evans MD, Roberg KA, Anderson EL, Pappas TE, et al. Wheezing rhinovirus illnesses in early life predict asthma development in high-risk children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(7):667-72. [PubMed ID: 18565953]. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200802-309OC.

  • 60.

    Koshy E, Watt H, Curcin V, Bottle A, Sharland M, Saxena S. Tonsillectomy among children with low baseline acute throat infection consultation rates in UK general practices: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(2):e006686. [PubMed ID: 25649213]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006686.

  • 61.

    van den Aardweg MT, Boonacker CW, Rovers MM, Hoes AW, Schilder AG. Effectiveness of adenoidectomy in children with recurrent upper respiratory tract infections: open randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;343:d5154. [PubMed ID: 21896611]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5154.

  • 62.

    Byington CL, Barnett ED, Davies HD, Edwards KM, Jackson MA, Maldonado YA, et al. Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2014–2015. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5):e1503-19.

  • 63.

    Grohskopf LA, Olsen SJ, Sokolow LZ, Bresee JS, Cox NJ, Broder KR, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) -- United States, 2014-15 influenza season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(32):691-7. [PubMed ID: 25121712].

  • 64.

    Esposito S, Marchisio P, Cavagna R, Gironi S, Bosis S, Lambertini L, et al. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination of children with recurrent respiratory tract infections in reducing respiratory-related morbidity within the households. Vaccine. 2003;21(23):3162-8. [PubMed ID: 12804844].

  • 65.

    Patria MF, Tagliabue C, Longhi B, Esposito S. Influenza vaccination in children at high risk of respiratory disease. Ther Adv Vaccines. 2013;1(1):21-31. [PubMed ID: 24757513]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051013613480770.

  • 66.

    Glezen WP, Gaglani MJ, Kozinetz CA, Piedra PA. Direct and indirect effectiveness of influenza vaccination delivered to children at school preceding an epidemic caused by 3 new influenza virus variants. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(11):1626-33. [PubMed ID: 21028955]. https://doi.org/10.1086/657089.

  • 67.

    Esposito S, Tagliabue C, Tagliaferri L, Semino M, Longo MR, Principi N. Preventing influenza in younger children. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18 Suppl 5:42-9. [PubMed ID: 22862744]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03942.x.

  • 68.

    Esposito S, Montinaro V, Bosis S, Tagliabue C, Baggi E, Principi N. Recommendations for the use of influenza vaccine in pediatrics. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8(1):102-6. [PubMed ID: 22252005]. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.8.1.17957.

  • 69.

    Song A, Myojo K, Laudenslager J, Harada D, Miura T, Suzuki K, et al. Evaluation of a fully human monoclonal antibody against multiple influenza A viral strains in mice and a pandemic H1N1 strain in nonhuman primates. Antiviral Res. 2014;111:60-8. [PubMed ID: 25218949]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.08.016.

  • 70.

    Greenberg HB, Piedra PA. Immunization against viral respiratory disease: a review. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(11 Suppl):S254-61. [PubMed ID: 15577581].

  • 71.

    Bousquet J, Fiocchi A. Prevention of recurrent respiratory tract infections in children using a ribosomal immunotherapeutic agent: a clinical review. Paediatr Drugs. 2006;8(4):235-43. [PubMed ID: 16898854].

  • 72.

    Schaad UB. Prevention of paediatric respiratory tract infections: emphasis on the role of OM-85. Eur Respiratory Rev. 2005;14(95):74-7. https://doi.org/10.1183/09059180.05.00009506.

  • 73.

    Del-Rio-Navarro BE, Espinosa-Rosales FJ, Flenady V, Sienra-Monge JJL. Cochrane Review: Immunostimulants for preventing respiratory tract infection in children. Evid Based Child Health Cochrane Rev J. 2012;7(2):629-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ebch.1833.

  • 74.

    Luan H, Zhang Q, Wang L, Wang C, Zhang M, Xu X, et al. OM85-BV induced the productions of IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha via TLR4- and TLR2-mediated ERK1/2/NF-kappaB pathway in RAW264.7 cells. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2014;34(7):526-36. [PubMed ID: 24605772]. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2013.0077.

  • 75.

    Wybran J, Libin M, Schandene L. Activation of natural killer cells and cytokine production in man by bacterial extracts. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1989;11(1):17-32. [PubMed ID: 2503554]. https://doi.org/10.3109/08923978909082140.

  • 76.

    Alyanakian MA, Grela F, Aumeunier A, Chiavaroli C, Gouarin C, Bardel E, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta and natural killer T-cells are involved in the protective effect of a bacterial extract on type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2006;55(1):179-85. [PubMed ID: 16380491].

  • 77.

    Parola C, Salogni L, Vaira X, Scutera S, Somma P, Salvi V, et al. Selective activation of human dendritic cells by OM-85 through a NF-kB and MAPK dependent pathway. PLoS One. 2013;8(12). eee82867. [PubMed ID: 24386121]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082867.

  • 78.

    Pasquali C, Salami O, Taneja M, Gollwitzer ES, Trompette A, Pattaroni C, et al. Enhanced Mucosal Antibody Production and Protection against Respiratory Infections Following an Orally Administered Bacterial Extract. Front Med (Lausanne). 2014;1:41. [PubMed ID: 25593914]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2014.00041.

  • 79.

    Del-Rio-Navarro BE, Espinosa Rosales F, Flenady V, Sienra-Monge JJ. Immunostimulants for preventing respiratory tract infection in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD004974. [PubMed ID: 17054227]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004974.pub2.

  • 80.

    Sopo SM, Onesimo R, Giorgio V, Fundaro C, Tabacco F, Calvani M. Efficacy of over-the-counter immunostimulants in the prevention of paediatric recurrent acute respiratory tract infections. Criticisms and pitfalls of available metanalyses. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;43(5):157-61. [PubMed ID: 22145251].

  • 81.

    Schaad UB, Mutterlein R, Goffin H, B. V-Child Study Group. Immunostimulation with OM-85 in children with recurrent infections of the upper respiratory tract: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Chest. 2002;122(6):2042-9. [PubMed ID: 12475845].

  • 82.

    Maestroni GJ, Losa GA. Clinical and immunobiological effects of an orally administered bacterial extract. Int J Immunopharmacol. 1984;6(2):111-7. [PubMed ID: 6234240].

  • 83.

    Field J, Gómez-Barreto D, Del-Río-Navarro BE, Berber A. Use of OM-85 BV in primary prevention of acute respiratory tract infections in children in orphanages. Curr Ther Res. 1998;59(6):407-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-393x(98)85044-3.

  • 84.

    Bitar MA, Saade R. The role of OM-85 BV (Broncho-Vaxom) in preventing recurrent acute tonsillitis in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(5):670-3. [PubMed ID: 23380631]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.01.009.

  • 85.

    Karaca NE, Gulez N, Aksu G, Azarsiz E, Kutukculer N. Does OM-85 BV prophylaxis trigger autoimmunity in IgA deficient children? Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11(11):1747-51. [PubMed ID: 21771668]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2011.06.009.

  • 86.

    Esposito S, Marchisio P, Prada E, Daleno C, Porretti L, Carsetti R, et al. Impact of a mixed bacterial lysate (OM-85 BV) on the immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of inactivated influenza vaccine in children with recurrent respiratory tract infection. Vaccine. 2014;32(22):2546-52. [PubMed ID: 24681270]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.055.

  • 87.

    Zaniolo O, Pradelli L, Eandi M. Effectiveness of the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections by a bacterial extract non-specific immunostimulant (OM-85). Treat Programs. 2013;6(3):169-84.