Arch Clin Infect Dis
Arch Clin Infect Dis

article information

Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases: Vol.16, issue 1; e107137
published online: March 24, 2021
article type: Research Article
received: July 4, 2020
revised: March 3, 2021
accepted: March 7, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.107137
Crossmark

Infection with Human Papillomavirus as a Potential Risk Factor for Prostate Cancer: A Case-control Study

authors:

avatar Solmaz Ohadian Moghadam ORCID 1 , * , avatar Mohammad Reza Nowroozi ORCID 1 , avatar Ali Nowroozi 1 , avatar Pouria Rezaei 1

Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Ohadian Moghadam S, Nowroozi M R, Nowroozi A, Rezaei P . Infection with Human Papillomavirus as a Potential Risk Factor for Prostate Cancer: A Case-control Study. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2021;16(1):e107137. https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.107137.

Abstract

Background:

Prostate cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in men, with several risk factors, including infection. In this study, we aimed to assess the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness.

Methods:

This case-control study was performed on a total of 70 archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) prostatic tissue blocks. Among them, 35 histopathologically confirmed prostate cancer tissues and 35 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) samples were enrolled as cases and controls, respectively. The specimens were examined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization for the detection of HPV DNA of both low-risk (6, 11) and high-risk (16, 18) types.

Results:

The primary results of PCR for the L1 region revealed HPV infection in 34.3% and 8.6% of the cases and controls, respectively (P = 0.018). The HPV typing using hybridization revealed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of infection with HPV types 16 and 18 (P = 0.003, P = 0.028, respectively). The findings showed no significant association of HPV infection with age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of the patients. In addition, no significant association was found between infection with HPV and Gleason score (GS).

Conclusions:

Our findings indicated that HPV infection, especially with high-risk types 16 and 18, has a significant association with prostatic carcinogenesis. In addition, although patients with GS = 7 showed higher rates of infection with HPV, we did not observe any statistical association between HPV infection and GS.

1. Background

Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer diagnosed and the second leading cause of cancer-related death among males all over the world, with an estimated 1,276,106 new cases and 358,989 deaths annually. During the last decades, the burden of prostate cancer has extensively increased (1, 2). The precise etiology of prostate cancer has not yet been determined. However, several factors are supposed to contribute to its development, including genetic background, lifestyle, environmental exposures, inflammation, and infections (3, 4).

It has been suggested that inflammation caused by infectious agents has a significant role in the regulation of tumor microenvironment and is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (5). Sexually transmitted infections by oncogenic viruses such as Human Papillomaviruses (HPVs) can cause cellular transformation in prostate tissue (6). Human papillomaviruses belong to the Papillomaviridae family, a group of small, non-enveloped, double-stranded, circular DNA viruses. They comprise more than 120 types, classified into low-risk (non-oncogenic) HPV types (including types 6, 11, 42, 43, and 44) and high-risk types (oncogenic; types 16, 18, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68, and 70) (7). Among them, almost 40 types (for instance types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 52, 56, 58, and 68) are well-known risk factors for the occurrence of cancer (7).

The HPV infection can be a cause of prostatitis (8). Moreover, HPV oncogenes (E6 and E7) target several cellular factors associated with cell-cycle regulatory systems. The E6 and E7 oncoproteins inhibit the function of tumor suppressor proteins p53 and pRb, respectively (9). Clinical and epidemiological evidence demonstrates the role of HPV in the development of other cancers (10, 11). However, there are contradictory findings of the role of HPV infection in the development of prostate cancer, which may be related to ethnic variations and different genetic backgrounds (12-14).

2. Objectives

Accordingly, the current case-control study aimed to investigate the association of HPV infection with prostate cancer development among Iranian men. Moreover, the correlation of HPV with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and disease aggressiveness was assessed.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

This case-control study was performed on 70 archival formalin fixed-paraffin embedded (FFPE) prostatic tissue blocks obtained from men undergoing either transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate or radical prostatectomy at our institution. Among them, 35 histopathologically confirmed prostate cancer tissues and 35 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) samples were enrolled in the study as cases and controls, respectively. The differentiation level of the prostate tumor (Gleason Score, GS) was assessed by a pathologist using the Gleason scoring system (well-differentiated, GS < 7; moderately differentiated, GS = 7; poorly differentiated, GS > 7) (15, 16). This study was performed following the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1397.1096).

3.2. HPV Typing

The obtained specimens were examined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in situ hybridization. Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor tissues and BPH samples (as cases and controls, respectively) using QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. A PCR assay was conducted for the detection of HPV according to the amplification conditions and primers described in a previous study (17). Briefly, consensus primers of MY09/MY11, GP5+/6+ with PCR product sizes of 450 bp and 150 bp, respectively, were used for the highly conserved late region I (L1) of the HPV genome, which encodes a viral capsid protein (18). The β-globin gene amplification was performed as the internal control (PCR product size: 268 bp), as described previously (19). Subsequently, HPV-positive specimens were subjected to hybridization with the consensus radiolabelled oligonucleotide probes to detect high-risk HPV types (16/18) and low-risk types (6/11). The detailed procedure was described previously (19).

3.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Quantitative data were compared using t-test and qualitative data using either Fischer's exact test or the chi-square test. These tests were considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05.

4. Results

4.1. Clinicopathological and Demographic Characteristics

A total of 70 histopathologically confirmed prostate tissues comprising 35 BPH and 35 cancerous ones were selected as cases and controls, respectively. The age of prostate cancer cases ranged from 51 to 79 years (mean 64.9 ± 7.5 years), and that of BPH controls ranged from 50 to 79 years (mean 64.4 ± 6.2 years), with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.768). The PSA level ranged from 3 to 27 ng/mL (mean 9.93 ± 5.47 ng/mL) in cancer patients compared to 1 to 19 ng/mL (mean 8.86 ± 4.27 ng/mL) in BPH controls. The result of the independent t-test revealed that the mean PSA level did not differ significantly between cases and controls (P = 0.367). Among patients with prostate cancer, nine (25.7%), 19 (54.3%), and seven (20%) patients had GS < 7, = 7, and > 7, respectively.

4.2. HPV Prevalence

Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between the presence of HPV DNA and prostate cancer. The primary results of PCR for the L1 region revealed HPV infection in 34.3% and 8.6% of the cases and controls, respectively (P = 0.018). The HPV typing using in situ hybridization revealed a significant difference between the two groups of cases and controls in terms of infection with HPV types 16 and 18 (Table 1). In addition, none of the cases and controls were positive for HPV type 6. The results of the analysis of the relationship between HPV and clinicopathological and demographic characteristics in the case group are presented in Table 2. The findings showed no significant association of HPV infection with age and PSA level of the patients (Table 2). There was also no significant relationship between the age of patients and infection with different types of HPV (P > 0.05). In addition, no significant association was found between infection with HPV and GS (Table 2).

Table 1.

Human Papillomavirus Status Among Study Groups

HPV StatusNo. of Patients (%), N = 70Case Group (%), N = 35Control Group (%), N = 35P-Value
HPV L115 (21.4)12 (34.3)3 (8.6)0.018 a
HPV167 (10.0)7 (20.0)0 (0.0)0.003 a
HPV187 (10.0)6 (17.1)1 (2.9)0.028 a
HPV113 (4.3)1 (2.9)2 (5.7)1.000

aSignificant.

Table 2.

Clinico-pathological and Demographic Characteristics and Human Papillomavirus Status of Prostate Cancer Cases

CharacteristicsNo. of Patients (%)HPV L1 (%)HPV16 (%)HPV18 (%)HPV11 (%)
No. (%)3512 (34.3)7 (20.0)4 (11.4)1 (2.9)
Age
< 609 (25.7)5 (55.6)3 (33.3)2 (22.2)0 (0.0)
≥ 6026 (74.3)7 (26.9)4 (15.4)2 (7.7)1 (3.8)
P-value0. 2200.3060.2041.000
PSA
< 1019 (54.3)6 (31.6)4 (21.1)2 (10.5)0 (0.0)
≥ 1016 (45.7)6 (37.5)3 (18.8)2 (12.5)1 (6.3)
P-value0.7361.0001.0000.458
Gleason Score
< 79 (25.7)2 (22.2)0 (0.0)1 (11.1)1 (11.1)
= 719 (54.3)9 (47.4)6 (31.6)3 (15.8)0 (0.0)
> 77 (20.0)1 (14.3)1 (14.3)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
P-value0.2230.1370.7870.583

5. Discussion

It has been established that high-risk HPVs may have a potential role in the development of cancer (20). The association of oncogenic HPV types (such as types 16 and 18) with the development of epithelial cancers has been suggested previously (11, 20-22). However, the role of HPV infection in the development of prostate cancer is controversial (12, 23, 24). In the current study, the HPV infection was evaluated in prostate cancer cases, and BPH controls.

The results of the present study indicated a significant association between HPV infection and prostate cancer (P = 0.018). Our finding is consistent with those of other studies performed worldwide (13, 18, 25, 26). Thus, it could be concluded that HPV infection potentially affects prostate cancer development. The immortalization of prostate epithelial cells with HPV types 16 and 18 has been shown previously (27). Moreover, the contribution of HPV to prostate cancer may indicate that chronic recurrent inflammation is triggered by infection, and subsequently, the prostate gland is infected because of the close anatomical juxtaposition to the urinary sites (18).

On the contrary, two previous studies performed in Brazil yielded opposite results and reported no significant association between HPV infection and prostate cancer (14, 28). The data from a previous study in Iran also showed the presence of HPV DNA in 17.2% of prostate tumor samples and reported no significant role for HPV infection to play in prostatic disease (29). Moreover, in an additional study that used serological and molecular methods, no significant association was found between infection with HPV and prostate cancer (26). Contradictory results of different studies about the association of HPV with prostate cancer could be due to the effect of different factors such as ethnicity, geographical area, and lifestyle (25).

In the present study, the prevalence of HPV cancer cases was found to be 34.3%, which was lower than that reported in some previous studies in other regions (19, 30). The former studies in India, Argentina, and California have reported a detection rate of HPV DNA in prostate cancer between 41% and 65% (19, 25, 30). The prevalence of HPV-16 and 18 in prostate cancer cases varies in different studies and ranges from 2 to 65% (31-34). We found the highest rate of HPV infection in subtype 16 (20%), and none of the cases and controls were positive for HPV type 6.

In our study, further typing of HPV demonstrated a significant difference in infection with high-risk HPV (types 16 and 18) between cases and controls (P = 0.003 and 0.028, respectively). In addition, we found that the majority of the cancer cases that were positive for HPV infection harbored high-risk HPV types 16 and 18. This result may reveal the role of high-risk types of HPV in the development of prostate cancer. This result was also in line with data from previous studies (35). The involvement of HPV type 16 has been reported in over 50% of genital infections and a great number of oropharyngeal and anogenital cancers (36). Moreover, neither the cases nor the controls were positive for low-risk HPV type 6 in the present study.

According to our results, although younger patients (< 60) had a higher frequency of HPV infections, there was no significant association between infection and HPV and age (P > 0.05, Table 2). In addition, patients with GS = 7 showed higher rates of infection with HPV. However, we did not observe any association between HPV infection and GS; whereas, a former study indicated that HPV infection was more prevalent in the advanced stage of prostate cancer (25). Our results in terms of the lack of association between GS and HPV infection are in line with the results of Martinez-Fierro et al. They also found no correlation between HPV infection and tumor aggressiveness (37).

We found that the prevalence of HPV in the BPH group was 8.6%, and only one of them was infected with high-risk HPV type. However, a study by Glenn et al. indicated the presence of high-risk HPVs in benign prostatic tissues before the development of prostate tumors in the same patients. They suggested that HPV has an oncogenic role in the early stage of prostate tumorigenesis (38).

Like other studies, our study also has some limitations, including the small sample size. Moreover, other high-risk genotypes of HPV were not studied, which are proposed to be investigated in future studies.

5.1. Conclusions

To conclude, the present study signifies the potential role of HPV infection, especially with high-risk types, in prostatic carcinogenesis rather than tumor progression or aggressiveness. The asymptomatic HPV-infected males can be considered as reservoirs and carriers of the virus to their sexual partners. Therefore, given the role of HPV in cervical cancer, it can be a risk factor for both men and their spouses (39). Additional studies are required to establish the association of this sexually transmitted virus and the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Therefore, preventive measures such as vaccination against HPV infection (especially high-risk types) or screening and treatment of infected individuals can be directed as a strategy for limiting prostate cancer.

References

  • 1.

    Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019;10(2):63-89. [PubMed ID: 31068988]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6497009]. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1191.

  • 2.

    Pishgar F, Ebrahimi H, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Fitzmaurice C, Amini E. Global, Regional and National Burden of Prostate Cancer, 1990 to 2015: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1224-32. [PubMed ID: 29129779]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.044.

  • 3.

    Wang G, Zhao D, Spring DJ, DePinho RA. Genetics and biology of prostate cancer. Genes Dev. 2018;32(17-18):1105-40. [PubMed ID: 30181359]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6120714]. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.315739.118.

  • 4.

    Karan D, Thrasher JB, Lubaroff D. Prostate cancer: genes, environment, immunity and the use of immunotherapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008;11(3):230-6. [PubMed ID: 18283297]. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2008.3.

  • 5.

    Stark T, Livas L, Kyprianou N. Inflammation in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic targeting. Transl Androl Urol. 2015;4(4):455-63. [PubMed ID: 26816843]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4708587]. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.04.12.

  • 6.

    Caini S, Gandini S, Dudas M, Bremer V, Severi E, Gherasim A. Sexually transmitted infections and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;38(4):329-38. [PubMed ID: 24986642]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2014.06.002.

  • 7.

    Pierce Campbell CM, Messina JL, Stoler MH, Jukic DM, Tommasino M, Gheit T, et al. Cutaneous human papillomavirus types detected on the surface of male external genital lesions: a case series within the HPV Infection in Men Study. J Clin Virol. 2013;58(4):652-9. [PubMed ID: 24210970]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3866698]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2013.10.011.

  • 8.

    Davila-Rodriguez MI, Ignacio Morales CV, Aragon Tovar AR, Olache Jimenez D, Castelan Maldonado E, Lara Miranda S, et al. Human Papilloma Virus Detection by INNOLiPA HPV in Prostate Tissue from Men of Northeast Mexico. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(11):4863-5. [PubMed ID: 28030912]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5454687]. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.11.4863.

  • 9.

    Yeo-Teh NSL, Ito Y, Jha S. High-Risk Human Papillomaviral Oncogenes E6 and E7 Target Key Cellular Pathways to Achieve Oncogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(6). [PubMed ID: 29890655]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6032416]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061706.

  • 10.

    Singh N, Sobti RC, Suri V, Nijhawan R, Sharma S, Das BC, et al. Downregulation of tumor suppressor gene PML in uterine cervical carcinogenesis: impact of human papillomavirus infection (HPV). Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128(3):420-6. [PubMed ID: 23220564]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.041.

  • 11.

    Sobti RC, Singh N, Hussain S, Suri V, Nijhawan R, Bharti AC, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation and loss of suppressor of cytokine signalling-1 gene expression in the development of uterine cervical carcinogenesis. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2011;34(6):533-43. [PubMed ID: 21935712]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-011-0056-2.

  • 12.

    Aghakhani A, Hamkar R, Parvin M, Ghavami N, Nadri M, Pakfetrat A, et al. The role of human papillomavirus infection in prostate carcinoma. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011;43(1):64-9. [PubMed ID: 20662618]. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2010.502904.

  • 13.

    Lin Y, Mao Q, Zheng X, Yang K, Chen H, Zhou C, et al. Human papillomavirus 16 or 18 infection and prostate cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Ir J Med Sci. 2011;180(2):497-503. [PubMed ID: 21400096]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-011-0692-6.

  • 14.

    Silvestre RV, Leal MF, Demachki S, Nahum MC, Bernardes JG, Rabenhorst SH, et al. Low frequency of human papillomavirus detection in prostate tissue from individuals from Northern Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(4):665-7. [PubMed ID: 19722096]. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0074-02762009000400024.

  • 15.

    Epstein JI, Allsbrook WJ, Amin MB, Egevad LL, Isup Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(9):1228-42. [PubMed ID: 16096414]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1.

  • 16.

    Egevad L, Srigley JR, Delahunt B. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens: rationale and organization. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(1):1-5. [PubMed ID: 20802466]. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.159.

  • 17.

    Venceslau EM, Bezerra MM, Lopes ACM, Souza ÉV, Onofre ASC, Melo CMD, et al. HPV detection using primers MY09/MY11 and GP5+/GP6+ in patients with cytologic and/or colposcopic changes. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2014;50(4). https://doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20140028.

  • 18.

    Medel-Flores O, Valenzuela-Rodriguez VA, Ocadiz-Delgado R, Castro-Munoz LJ, Hernandez-Leyva S, Lara-Hernandez G, et al. Association between HPV infection and prostate cancer in a Mexican population. Genet Mol Biol. 2018;41(4):781-9. [PubMed ID: 30508006]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6415601]. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0331.

  • 19.

    Leiros GJ, Galliano SR, Sember ME, Kahn T, Schwarz E, Eiguchi K. Detection of human papillomavirus DNA and p53 codon 72 polymorphism in prostate carcinomas of patients from Argentina. BMC Urol. 2005;5:15. [PubMed ID: 16307686]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1314892]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-5-15.

  • 20.

    Das BC, Hussain S, Nasare V, Bharadwaj M. Prospects and prejudices of human papillomavirus vaccines in India. Vaccine. 2008;26(22):2669-79. [PubMed ID: 18455843]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.056.

  • 21.

    Thakur N, Hussain S, Kohaar I, Tabassum R, Nasare V, Tiwari P, et al. Genetic variant of CCND1: association with HPV-mediated cervical cancer in Indian population. Biomarkers. 2009;14(4):219-25. [PubMed ID: 19489683]. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547500902825274.

  • 22.

    Sobti RC, Singh N, Hussain S, Suri V, Bharadwaj M, Das BC. Deregulation of STAT-5 isoforms in the development of HPV-mediated cervical carcinogenesis. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2010;30(3):178-88. [PubMed ID: 20415542]. https://doi.org/10.3109/10799891003786218.

  • 23.

    Al Moustafa AE. Involvement of human papillomavirus infections in prostate cancer progression. Med Hypotheses. 2008;71(2):209-11. [PubMed ID: 18468811]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2008.03.036.

  • 24.

    Gazzaz FS, Mosli HA. Lack of detection of human papillomavirus infection by hybridization test in prostatic biopsies. Saudi Med J. 2009;30(5):633-7. [PubMed ID: 19417961].

  • 25.

    Singh N, Hussain S, Kakkar N, Singh SK, Sobti RC, Bharadwaj M. Implication of high risk human papillomavirus HR-HPV infection in prostate cancer in Indian population--a pioneering case-control analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7822. [PubMed ID: 25592643]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4296305]. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07822.

  • 26.

    Chen AC, Waterboer T, Keleher A, Morrison B, Jindal S, McMillan D, et al. Human papillomavirus in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic adenocarcinoma patients. Pathol Oncol Res. 2011;17(3):613-7. [PubMed ID: 21240663]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-010-9357-4.

  • 27.

    Naghashfar Z, DiPaolo JA, Woodworth CD, Passaniti A. Immortalization of human adult prostatic adenocarcinoma cells by human papilloma virus HPV16 and — 18 DNA. Cancer Letters. 1996;100(1-2):47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(95)04071-4.

  • 28.

    Araujo-Neto AP, Ferreira-Fernandes H, Amaral CM, Santos LG, Freitas AC, Silva-Neto JC, et al. Lack of detection of human papillomavirus DNA in prostate carcinomas in patients from northeastern Brazil. Genet Mol Biol. 2016;39(1):24-9. [PubMed ID: 27007894]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4807381]. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2015-0122.

  • 29.

    Ghasemian E, Monavari SH, Irajian GR, Jalali Nodoshan MR, Roudsari RV, Yahyapour Y. Evaluation of human papillomavirus infections in prostatic disease: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(5):3305-8. [PubMed ID: 23803120]. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.5.3305.

  • 30.

    Zambrano A, Kalantari M, Simoneau A, Jensen JL, Villarreal LP. Detection of human polyomaviruses and papillomaviruses in prostatic tissue reveals the prostate as a habitat for multiple viral infections. Prostate. 2002;53(4):263-76. [PubMed ID: 12430138]. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.10157.

  • 31.

    Kuczyk M, Serth J, Machtens S, Jonas U. Detection of viral HPV 16 DNA in prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia by quantitative PCR-directed analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2000;3(S1). S23. [PubMed ID: 12497133]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500448.

  • 32.

    Rosenblatt KA, Carter JJ, Iwasaki LM, Galloway DA, Stanford JL. Serologic evidence of human papillomavirus 16 and 18 infections and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2003;12(8):763-8.

  • 33.

    Samsonov RB, Klochkova TG, Evtushenko VI. [Infection of the prostate by herpesviruses and HPV in patients with prostate cancer]. Vopr Onkol. 2012;58(6):795-9. Russian. [PubMed ID: 23600306].

  • 34.

    Pourmand G, Salem S, Mehrsai A, Lotfi M, Amirzargar MA, Mazdak H, et al. The risk factors of prostate cancer: a multicentric case-control study in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2007;8(3):422-8. [PubMed ID: 18159981].

  • 35.

    Carozzi F, Lombardi FC, Zendron P, Confortini M, Sani C, Bisanzi S, et al. Association of human papillomavirus with prostate cancer: analysis of a consecutive series of prostate biopsies. Int J Biol Markers. 2004;19(4):257-61. [PubMed ID: 15646830]. https://doi.org/10.5301/jbm.2008.3977.

  • 36.

    LaRue H, Simoneau M, Fradet Y. Human papillomavirus in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1(4):435-40. [PubMed ID: 9816001].

  • 37.

    Martins AE, Lucena-Silva N, Garcia RG, Welkovic S, Barboza A, Menezes ML, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection, distribution of viral types and risk factors in cervical samples from human immunodeficiency virus-positive women attending three human immunodeficiency virus-acquired immune deficiency syndrome reference centres in northeastern Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2014;109(6):738-47. [PubMed ID: 25317701]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4238765]. https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-0276140070.

  • 38.

    Glenn WK, Ngan CC, Amos TG, Edwards RJ, Swift J, Lutze-Mann L, et al. High risk human papilloma viruses (HPVs) are present in benign prostate tissues before development of HPV associated prostate cancer. Infect Agent Cancer. 2017;12:46. [PubMed ID: 28811834]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5553674]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-017-0157-2.

  • 39.

    Davarmanesh M, Jazayeri SM, Dezfulian M, Gharavi MJ. High risk genotype distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) according to age groups in Iranian asymptomatic men. Infect Agent Cancer. 2020;15:29. [PubMed ID: 32411292]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7204313]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-020-00296-6.