Fifty-five females and 5 males with the mean age of 49.23 ± 8.96 participated. The youngest was twenty-two and the oldest was seventy years old. Demographic and clinical information of the control group (N = 20) are as follows:
Gender: female: 19 (95%) and male: 1 (5%), age (year): 47.4 ± 8.96 ± SD, height (cm): 163.5 ± 7.8 ± SD, weight (kg): 77.9 ± 9.4 ± SD hand with CTS problem: right: 12 (60%), left: 8 (40%), job: employed: 12 (60%) and housewife: 8 (40%), the severity of the problem: mild: 13 (65%) and moderate: 7 (35%), systemic problems : 6 (30%) patient
Demographic and clinical information of the exercise therapy + Brace (N = 20) group are as follows:
Gender: female: 19 (95%) and male: 1 (5%), age (year): 49.55 ± 8.41 ± SD, height (cm): 160.2 ± 5.8 ± SD, weight (kg): 78.78 ± 10.8 ± SD hand with CTS problem: right: 8 (40%), left: 12 (60%), job: employed: 15 (75%) and housewife: 5 (25%), the severity of the problem: mild: 12 (60%) and moderate: 8 (40%), systemic problems : 5 (25%) patient
Demographic and clinical information of the acupuncture + Brace (N = 20) group are as follows:
Gender: female: 18 (90%) and male: 2 (10%), age (year): 50.75 ± 9.59 ± SD, height (cm): 159.35 ± 5.3 ± SD, weight (kg): 77.5 ± 12.85 ± SD hand with CTS problem: right: 9 (45%), left: 11 (55%), job: employed: 18 (90%) and housewife: 2 (10%), the severity of the problem: mild: 13 (65%) and moderate: 7 (35%), systemic problems : 7 (35%)patient
There was no statistically significant difference between gender, age, height, weight, the presence of systemic disease, job, involved hand, and disease severity in three treatment groups (P > 0.05)
The current study showed the grip force, pinch force and range of motion (flexion and extension) of the wrist were significantly improved in CTS patients at the end of 6 weeks in all three groups (P < 0.05). Although using brace alone (control group) did not have any significant effect on the wrist flexion and extension (P = 0.098 and 0.093) (
Table 2).
| Variable | Baseline (Mean ± SD) | After Treatment (Mean ± SD) | Difference | P Value | Effect Size |
|---|
| Grip force, kg | | | | | |
| Control | 16.9 ± 5 | 17.95 ± 5.1 | 1.05 ± 1.43 | 0.054 | 0.103 |
| Brace + Exercise therapy | 18.78 ± 5.7 | 22.95 ± 5.1 | 4.15 ± 4.1 | < 0.001 | 0.359 |
| Brace + acupuncture | 18.8 ± 4.32 | 21.15 ± 4.78 | 2.35 ± 4.33 | 0.025 | 0.249 |
| Pinch force, kg | | | | | |
| Control | 6.03 ± 1.4 | 6.67 ± 1.7 | 0.65 ± 0.52 | 0.082 | 0.201 |
| Brace + Exercise therapy | 5.26 ± 1.23 | 6.58 ± 1.4 | 1.05 ± 1 | < 0.001 | 0.447 |
| Brace + acupuncture | 5.45 ± 0.66 | 6.57 ± 0.92 | 1.12 ± 1.08 | < 0.001 | 0.573 |
| Flexion, cm | | | | | |
| Control | 83.28 ± 3.8 | 83.62 ± 3.89 | 0.34 ± 0.89 | 0.098 | 0.044 |
| Brace + Exercise therapy | 77.57 ± 6.15 | 83.17 ± 3.42 | 5.6 ± 4.21 | < 0.001 | 0.490 |
| Brace + acupuncture | 82.47 ± 4.31 | 84.13 ± 3.39 | 1.67 ± 2.01 | 0.002 | 0.209 |
| Extension, cm | | | | | |
| Control | 66.2 ± 5.39 | 67.37 ± 4.77 | 1.16 ± 1.28 | 0.093 | 0.114 |
| Brace + Exercise therapy | 64.77 ± 3.69 | 71.32 ± 2.9 | 6.55 ± 2.97 | < 0.001 | 0.702 |
| Brace + acupuncture | 68.36 ± 3.14 | 69.75 ± 3.84 | 1.39 ± 2.34 | 0.015 | 0.194 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation
The between-groups analysis indicates that acupuncture affected the pinch force more than exercise therapy and it was statistically significant F (df = 2) = 0.035, P = 0.001 but weak (P Eta squared = 0.001). Also, the efficacy of exercise therapy was more than acupuncture in parameters of grip force and ROM (both flexion and extension) but just ROM of flexion was statistically significant F (df = 2) = 0.000, P = 0.001 but weak (P Eta squared = 0.012).