Assessment of Lead Contamination in Soils of Urban Parks of Khorramabad, Iran

authors:

avatar Eisa Solgi 1 , * , avatar Rohangiz Konani 1

Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Hamadan, IR Iran
Health Scope: Vol.5, issue 4; e36056
published online: May 30, 2016
article type: Research Article
received: January 5, 2016
revised: April 14, 2016
accepted: April 21, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17795/jhealthscope-36056

how to cite: Solgi E, Konani R. Assessment of Lead Contamination in Soils of Urban Parks of Khorramabad, Iran. Health Scope. 2016;5(4):e36056. https://doi.org/10.17795/jhealthscope-36056.

Abstract

Background:

The urban environment quality is of vital importance as most people throughout the world live in cities. For this reason, there is a need to monitor lead levels in the environment, particularly in metropolitan areas. To date, no research on soil pollution in Khorramabad urban areas has been performed.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess soils of Khorramabad metropolis in order to establish the concentration of lead and develop a contamination factor map.

Materials and Methods:

Soil samples were collected from 25 different urban parks in Khorramabad, Iran. The mean Pb contents in the urban topsoil samples were compared with mean concentrations for other cities around the world. A spatial distribution map of lead was created by GIS.

Results:

Analysis of urban soil samples for Pb content indicated the presence of Pb in all soil samples collected from the 40 sampling sites in 25 urban parks at varying concentrations ranging from 0.05 - 35 mg/kg. Elevated levels of Pb in soil were found in the center of the city. The findings regarding contamination factor (CF) showed low to moderate contamination of urban soil by lead.

Conclusions:

It was revealed that the contents in lead tend to increase in the historic and central part of the city. Map of lead distribution and contamination factor were created for this city indicating vehicular emission as the main source of lead pollution and likewise role of place and age of the park in accumulation of lead.

1. Background

Lead is one of the most prevalent heavy metal pollutants in urban soil that is of considerable interest to researchers. It is strongly affected by human activity; lead in soil may originate from atmospheric lead from industrial pollution and use of tetraethyl lead as a gasoline additive (1). At high concentrations, it becomes a toxic element to humans and most other forms of life. For this reason, there is a need to be concerned with elevated levels of lead in the environment and monitor the content of lead in various ecosystems particularly in urban ecosystems (2). Lead in urban soils comes from several sources. In industrial areas, atmospheric deposition of Pb emitted from the smelter is the main source of Pb accumulation in the surrounding soil (3). Along the highways, Pb is primarily caused by exhaust emissions (4). In residential areas, lead-based paints used to paint houses are the main source of contamination (5). Urban studies have proved lead concentrations to be the highest along the perimeter of building foundations and within a few feet of busy streets. Although lead in gas and lead-based paint is now banned, lead has the capability to persist in soil and water for a long time (6). Therefore, there is major concern about lead exposure from urban soils. Lead as a potent occupational toxin has been known as a major public health risk (7) owing to its well-established effects on neurobehavioral development in children (8). Lead poisoning is often insidious and asymptomatic with potential irreversible adverse effects. It can greatly affect the function of certain body systems and poisoning by lead primarily affects the hematopoietic, central nervous, hepatic and renal system leading to serious disorders. Several studies on lead contamination in urban soils have been conducted in several cities (5, 8-14). Hence, it is important to apprehend the spatial distribution and concentration of lead in urban soils. Our knowledge about spatial distribution of soil pollutants particularly metals is essential for delineating contaminated areas.

2. Objectives

The main purpose of this research was to evaluate lead concentration in urban soils in Khorramabad city (western Iran). Also other goals were to analyze the spatial distribution contour map and risk assessment constructed from environmental Pb concentrations collected from Khorramabad city.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Study Area Description

This study was conducted in Khorramabad city, capital city of Lorestan province, situated in western Iran. This city is geographically situated in the Zagros mountain ranges. This city is located between 250,500 to 257,000 meters eastern longitude and 3,714,000 to 3,713,000 meters northern latitude in universal transverse mercator (UTM). Khorramabad has an area of approximately 25.263 km2 and a population of 328,544 inhabitants (according to the 2006 census). The city of Khorramabad is situated at an altitude of 1171 meters above mean sea level. Khorramabad city has cold semi-arid climate with an annual average temperature and rainfall of 17.2°C and 512.7 mm, respectively.

3.2. Sampling and Analysis

In the present research, the sampling area was the urban area of Khorramabad, which has an area of 25 km2. The soil sampling was done in twenty-five urban parks of Khorramabad (Table 1). The sampled parks were selected to evenly cover the entire city. According to park area, in each park, two to three soil samples were collected. Sampling was carried out during May 2013 at depth of 0 - 20 cm. The locations of the parks and study area are shown on the map in Figure 1. Each soil sample consisted of five sub-samples that were collected in the park in order to have representative samples of the entire park. A total of 40 composite soil samples were collected. All the soil samples were stored in polyethylene Ziploc bags for transport and storage. A total of 40 soil samples were sent to the laboratory for determination of lead concentrations. The sampling points (longitudes and latitudes) of each sample were recorded by a GPS instrument. In the laboratory, soil samples were air-dried, ground, and passed through a sieve of 149 microns for lead and 200 microns for pH and EC. The prepared soil samples were digested using a mixed solution of the concentrated acids of HNO3 (Merck, 65%) and HCL (Merck, 37%) by volume and heated for a couple of minutes and then the digested contents were filtered through a no. 42 Whatman filter paper into 25 mL volumetric flasks. The concentrations of Pb in the digestion solution were analyzed with a flame atomic absorption spectrometer (PerkinElmer AAS 8020). The LOD of Pb was 0.03 mg/kg. For quality control, blanks, triplicate and spike samples were analyzed during the procedure. Accuracy was expressed as the percentage recovery of soil spiked samples. The obtained recovery was 96.5%.

Table 1.

Name of Park and Number of Collected Samples

Name of ParksNumber of Samples
Mehrvarzan3
Zayton3
Eram1
Golshan1
Parcham1
GoldashtGharbi1
Shahed1
Zybakenar4
Kio1
Sakhrehi2
Shahr1
Naserkhosro1
Golsorkh1
Motahari1
Moalem3
Nastaran3
Danshjo3
Shariati2
Asadabadi1
Andisheh1
Parastar1
Shaghayegh1
Laleh1
Azadegan1
The Study Area and Location of Soil Sample
The Study Area and Location of Soil Sample
Figure 1.

The Study Area and Location of Soil Sample

3.3. Contamination Factor (CF)

The assessment of contamination factor of metals is an important aspect that shows contamination degree of soil‎ (15). The contamination factor is calculated using the following relationship as proposed by Hakanson (16): Cf = C0 - Cn.

Where C0 is the average concentrations of metal in the sampling site and Cn is the pre-industrial concentration of metal (17). Modification factor as used by Loska et al. (18) and Solgi and Parmah (17) were used in the present research that they used the concentration of metals in the earth’s crust as a reference value. The Contamination Factor (CF) classifications were interpreted as suggested by Hakanson (16): CF < 1, indicates low, 1 < CF < 3, moderate, 3 < CF < 6, considerable and CF > 6, very high contamination.

3.4. Data Analysis with Computer Software

Basic statistics of the raw data were analysed with microsoft excel and SPSS 20.0 package. Data distribution was examined for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, geostatistical analysis, semivariogram model fitting and spatial distribution using ordinary kriging with the GIS software ArcGIS V.9.2 (ESRI Co, Redlands, USA). The spatial variability of lead pollution in urban park soils of Khorramabad city was mapped using a geoestatistical approach, which operates within a geographic information systems (GIS). A geostatistical technique measures the spatial variability of a regionalized variable and provides spatial interpolation of kriging (19). Appropriate interpolation models were selected to perform optimal and unbiased spatial interpolation on the concentrations of the lead using the geostatistical analyst modules of ArcGIS 9.3.

4. Results

The statistical results ‎of lead, EC and pH values are summarized in Table 2. Soil pH values varied from 6.97 to 8.68 in urban soil samples indicating that urban soils were nearly neutral to slightly alkaline. Also graphs of the pH and EC in the soil of twenty-five urban parks are presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 2.

Lead Concentrations, pH and EC in the Soils of Urban Parks in Khorramabad City

MinimumMaximumMeanStd. ErrorStd. DeviationSkewnessKurtosisCn
Pb (mg/kg)0.05357.381.257.941.813.5512.5
pH6.978.688.340.050.33-2.4657.04
EC (dS/m)0.170.600.260.010.072.8911.23
Soil pH Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City
Soil pH Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City
Figure 2.

Soil pH Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City

Soil EC Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City
Soil EC Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City
Figure 3.

Soil EC Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City

Figure 4 presents the concentrations of Pb in the soils sampled in different urban parks of the Khorramabad city. The results presented in Figure 4 indicate that Jalal-Al-Hosaini park exhibited the highest concentrations of Pb while the lowest concentrations occurred in Nastaran park.

The spatial distributions maps of Pb, pH and CF are shown in Figures 5 and 6. Soils of the Eram sampling area exhibited the lowest pH values (mean of 6.97), while the highest pH values (mean of 8.68) were from Zibakenar. The spatial distribution of pH in most study areas was homogeneous, showing coefficients of variation up to 4%. Concentrations of lead oscillate all over the city. As shown in Figure 5A, Pb concentrations increase from the north to the south. The assessment of soil contamination was carried out using the contamination factor, based on classification categories recognized by Hakanson (16) that are given in Figure 6. In this research, the contamination factor is presented in format of map by kriging method (Figure 6).

Soil Lead Concentration Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City
Soil Lead Concentration Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City
Figure 4.

Soil Lead Concentration Distribution in Urban Parks of Khorramabad City

A, Spatial Distribution Pattern of Lead (mg/kg); B, Spatial Distribution Pattern of Ph, in Urban Park Soils of Khorramabad City
A, Spatial Distribution Pattern of Lead (mg/kg); B, Spatial Distribution Pattern of Ph, in Urban Park Soils of Khorramabad City
Figure 5.

A, Spatial Distribution Pattern of Lead (mg/kg); B, Spatial Distribution Pattern of Ph, in Urban Park Soils of Khorramabad City

Spatial Distribution of Contamination Factor of Lead in Urban Park Soils of Khorramabad City
Spatial Distribution of Contamination Factor of Lead in Urban Park Soils of Khorramabad City
Figure 6.

Spatial Distribution of Contamination Factor of Lead in Urban Park Soils of Khorramabad City

5. Discussion

The differences of pH values can be explained by the high content of carbonate, ash, or cinders of anthropogenic activity in the region, which can increase the pH value of urban soils (20-22). Table 2 shows a wide range of lead concentrations (0.05 - 35 mg/kg) in the urban soils similar to the findings of Milenkovic et al. (23) in the urban soil of central Serbia. This range is probably related to differences in various pollution sources of sampling parks.

Table 3 provides a summary of different studies on lead contamination in different countries (24-44). In general, lead concentration levels in the soils studied in the current research are very low and largely different as compared to other studies around the world (Table 3). Mean concentration of lead (7.38 mg/kg) recorded in the current research was within the range recorded in Damascus (Syria) and Galicia (Spain). Obtained concentrations of Pb in Khorramabad was less than reported in Changchun, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Nanjing, Taiyuan Avellino (Italy), Beijing Ibadan (Nigeria) Galway, Madrid, Hangzhou and Bangkok (Thailand). This variation in levels of metals such as lead in the different cities around the world reflects the effect of different factors, for example type of a parent material, traffic density, microclimatic condition, and nature of anthropogenic inputs (45).

Table 3.

Lead Concentrations in Urban Soils From Different Cities Around the World (mg/kg)

CityPb (mg/kg)Reference
Changchun35.4(24)
Shenzhen38.9(25)
Chengdu50.8(26)
Nanjing107.3(27)
Taiyuan27.11(28)
Avellino, Italy87(29)
Beijing66.2(30)
Ibadan, Nigeria95.1(31)
Galway58(32)
Madrid22(33)
Hangzhou46.15(34)
Bangkok, Thailand47.8(35)
Damascus, Syria10(36)
Galicia, Spain11.7(37)
Murcia, Spain21.90(38)
Turku, Finland20(39)
Liaoning, China45.1(40)
Karachi, Pakistan56.23(41)
Klang district, Malaysia52.73(42)
Birjand46.59(43)
Zahedan10.7a(44)
Khorramabad7.38This study

aStreet dust samples.

Mao et al. (11) found lower levels of Pb in parks and road greenbelts in comparison to other sampled areas, which can be related to soil restoration (11). Although Khorramabad is one of the oldest and largest cities of Lorestan province, but had low concentrations of lead, which is probably due to their geology and/or lack of industrial activities in the study area.

Jalal-Al-Hosaini urban park located in the center of the Khorramabad City had the highest lead concentration, which can be associated with higher traffic in this area. Although Golshorkh and Shahr Park are located in the neighborhood of Jalal-Al-Hosaini, yet levels of lead are far less because there is no traffic route around these urban parks. These results show that emissions from traffic are the main sources of soil lead in Khorramabad, which is in agreement with the results reported by Wei and Yang (46). Also Madrid et al. (47) confirmed this in their research on metal in urban park soils of Seville, where they found that traffic is one of the main sources of metals such as Pb. Shaghayegh park had the second highest concentration of Pb that can be derived from produced wastes and residues from homes and buildings surrounding this park. In addition the lowest concentration of lead was measured in newly built urban parks and those that were located far from the city center. Chen et al. (30) concluded that the age and location of the urban parks is an important factor in the accumulation of metals (particularly for Pb) in the urban park soils. The older parks are more famous and attract a large number of tourists and visitors, which consequently lead to a greater amount of traffic.

Elevated Pb concentrations were found in the center of the city, which has a long history and higher traffic volumes. Many studies have shown highest lead concentrations in the center of urban areas as a result of traffic density and age of the urban area (48-50). The concentrations of Pb in other parts of the city were relatively low. Low soil lead concentrations were mainly distributed in two areas within the city: one was the eastern part of the city and the other was the northern part of the city (Figure 5A). This suggests that the low lead accumulations probably could be related to lower anthropogenic influence because of their history and location. Another possibility was that the increase of unleaded fuel utilization was followed by a rapid decline of Pb levels in the atmosphere.

The CFs for lead in different urban park soils ranged from 0.004 to 2.58 that falls in to two classes: CF < 1, indicates low contamination and 1 < CF < 3, moderate contamination. Consequently, soils from urban parks are considered to be of low to moderate pollution. Based on the map, the highest CF was found in center and south and least in the north. The moderate values of CF >1 can be due to the influence of urban activities such as traffic and disposal of waste containing lead.

In the current study, urban soil samples collected from twenty-five urban parks of the Khorramabad city were analyzed for Pb using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). The concentrations of Pb in urban soil ranged from 0.05 to 35 mg/kg, with mean value of 7.38. The concentrations of lead were compared with other cities and with the earth crust value. These results showed that urban soils in Khorramabad city have lower lead concentrations as a whole. The measured CF levels showed low to moderate contamination of urban soil in the Metropolis by lead. Also this study evaluated the spatial distribution of Pb in soils of Khorramabad city. The obtained results showed that emissions from traffic are the main sources of soil lead in Khorramabad. Also concentration of lead was relatively low in soils of newly constructed urban parks.

References

  • 1.

    Lark RM, Scheib C. Land use and lead content in the soils of London. Geoderma. 2013;209-10:65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.004.

  • 2.

    Holmgren GGS, Meyer MW, Chaney RL, Daniels RB. Cadmium, Lead, Zinc, Copper, and Nickel in Agricultural Soils of the United States of America. J Environ Qual. 1993;22(2):335. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200020015x.

  • 3.

    Douay F, Roussel H, Fourrier H, Heyman C, Chateau G. Investigation of heavy metal concentrations on urban soils, dust and vegetables nearby a former smelter site in Mortagne du Nord, Northern France. J Soils Sediments. 2007;7(3):143-6. https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2007.02.205.

  • 4.

    Teichman J, Coltrin D, Prouty K, Bir WA. A survey of lead contamination in soil along Interstate 880, Alameda County, California. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993;54(9):557-9. [PubMed ID: 8379498]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669391355035.

  • 5.

    Wu J, Edwards R, He XE, Liu Z, Kleinman M. Spatial analysis of bioavailable soil lead concentrations in Los Angeles, California. Environ Res. 2010;110(4):309-17. [PubMed ID: 20219189]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2010.02.004.

  • 6.

    Siddique K. Different Heavy Metal Concentrations in Plants and Soil Irrigated with Industrial/Sewage Waste Water. IJEMA. 2014;2(3):151. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20140203.14.

  • 7.

    Flora G, Gupta D, Tiwari A. Toxicity of lead: A review with recent updates. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2012;5(2):47-58. [PubMed ID: 23118587]. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-012-0009-2.

  • 8.

    Li J, Li K, Cave M, Li HB, Ma LQ. Lead bioaccessibility in 12 contaminated soils from China: Correlation to lead relative bioavailability and lead in different fractions. J Hazard Mater. 2015;295:55-62. [PubMed ID: 25911623]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.061.

  • 9.

    Cave M, Wragg J, Gowing C, Gardner A. Measuring the solid-phase fractionation of lead in urban and rural soils using a combination of geochemical survey data and chemical extractions. Environ Geochem Health. 2015;37(4):779-90. [PubMed ID: 25840564]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-015-9697-9.

  • 10.

    El Fadeli S, Bouhouch R, El Abbassi A, Chaik M, Aboussad A, Chabaa L, et al. Health risk assessment of lead contamination in soil, drinking water and plants from Marrakech urban area, Morocco. J Mater Environ Sci. 2014;5(1):225-30.

  • 11.

    Mao Q, Huang G, Ma K, Sun Z. Variations of soil lead in different land uses along the urbanization gradient in the Beijing metropolitan area. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(3):3199-214. [PubMed ID: 24646863]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110303199.

  • 12.

    Noll MR, Almeter K, Pope GG. Distribution of Lead in an Urban Soil: A Case Study and Implications for Potential Remedial Options. Procedia Earth Planet Sci. 2014;10:353-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2014.08.046.

  • 13.

    Solt MJ, Deocampo DM, Norris M. Spatial distribution of lead in Sacramento, California, USA. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(3):3174-87. [PubMed ID: 25789455]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120303174.

  • 14.

    Zawadzki J, Fabijanczyk P. Geostatistical evaluation of lead and zinc concentration in soils of an old mining area with complex land management. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2012;10(4):729-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0132-9.

  • 15.

    Saleem M, Iqbal J, Shah MH. Geochemical speciation, anthropogenic contamination, risk assessment and source identification of selected metals in freshwater sediments-A case study from Mangla Lake, Pakistan. Env Nano Mon Manag. 2015;4:27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2015.02.002.

  • 16.

    Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control.a sedimentological approach. Water Research. 1980;14(8):975-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8.

  • 17.

    Solgi E, Parmah J. Analysis and assessment of nickel and chromium pollution in soils around Baghejar Chromite Mine of Sabzevar Ophiolite Belt, Northeastern Iran. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2015;25(7):2380-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(15)63853-5.

  • 18.

    Loska K, Wiechuła D, Korus I. Metal contamination of farming soils affected by industry. Environ Int. 2004;30(2):159-65.

  • 19.

    Webster R, Oliver MA. Geostatistics for environmental scientists. 2 ed. England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470517277.

  • 20.

    Ge Y, Murray P, Hendershot WH. Trace metal speciation and bioavailability in urban soils. Environ Pollut. 2000;107(1):137-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00119-0.

  • 21.

    Lu SG, Bai SQ. Contamination and potential mobility assessment of heavy metals in urban soils of Hangzhou, China: relationship with different land uses. Environ Earth Sci. 2009;60(7):1481-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0283-2.

  • 22.

    Weissmannova HD, Pavlovsky J, Chovanec P. Heavy metal Contaminations of Urban soils in Ostrava, Czech Republic: Assessment of Metal Pollution and using Principal Component Analysis. Int J Environ Res. 2015;9(2).

  • 23.

    Milenkovic B, Stajic JM, Gulan LJ, Zeremski T, Nikezic D. Radioactivity levels and heavy metals in the urban soil of Central Serbia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(21):16732-41.

  • 24.

    Ward NI. Multielement contamination of British motorway environments. Sci Total Environ. 1990;93:393-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(90)90130-m.

  • 25.

    Yang Z, Lu W, Long Y, Bao X, Yang Q. Assessment of heavy metals contamination in urban topsoil from Changchun City, China. JGE. 2011;108(1):27-38.

  • 26.

    Shu T, Jun C, Ben-gang L. Distribution pattern of trace elements in soil from Shenzhen area [in Chinese]. Acta pedologica sinica. 2001;38(2):255-62.

  • 27.

    Shi ZM. Assessment of ecosystem geochemistry in Chengdu City [in Chinese]. Chengdu: University of Technology; 2004.

  • 28.

    Lu Y, Gong Z, Zhang G, Zhang B. Heavy metal concentration in Nanjing urban soils and their affecting factors. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2004;15(1):123-6. [PubMed ID: 15139203].

  • 29.

    Lu YH. The Research on urban soil heavy metals pollution in Taiyuan city and background of Taiyuan basin. Changsha: Central South University; 2005.

  • 30.

    Cicchella D, De Vivo B, Lima A, Albanese S, McGill RAR, Parrish RR. Heavy metal pollution and Pb isotopes in urban soils of Napoli, Italy. GEEA. 2008;8(1):103-12. https://doi.org/10.1144/1467-7873/07-148.

  • 31.

    Chen TB, Zheng YM, Lei M, Huang ZC, Wu HT, Chen H, et al. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China. Chemosphere. 2005;60(4):542-51. [PubMed ID: 15950046]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.072.

  • 32.

    Odewande AA, Abimbola AF. Contamination indices and heavy metal concentrations in urban soil of Ibadan metropolis, southwestern Nigeria. Environ Geochem Health. 2008;30(3):243-54. [PubMed ID: 17703366]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-007-9112-2.

  • 33.

    Zhang C. Using multivariate analyses and GIS to identify pollutants and their spatial patterns in urban soils in Galway, Ireland. Environ Pollut. 2006;142(3):501-11. [PubMed ID: 16406233]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.028.

  • 34.

    De Miguel E, Iribarren I, Chacon E, Ordonez A, Charlesworth S. Risk-based evaluation of the exposure of children to trace elements in playgrounds in Madrid (Spain). Chemosphere. 2007;66(3):505-13. [PubMed ID: 16844191]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.065.

  • 35.

    Chen T, Liu X, Zhu M, Zhao K, Wu J, Xu J, et al. Identification of trace element sources and associated risk assessment in vegetable soils of the urban-rural transitional area of Hangzhou, China. Environ Pollut. 2008;151(1):67-78. [PubMed ID: 17481789]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.03.004.

  • 36.

    Wilcke W, Müller S, Kanchanakool N, Zech W. Urban soil contamination in Bangkok: heavy metal and aluminium partitioning in topsoils. Geoderma. 1998;86(3-4):211-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00045-7.

  • 37.

    Moller A, Muller HW, Abdullah A, Abdelgawad G, Utermann J. Urban soil pollution in Damascus, Syria: concentrations and patterns of heavy metals in the soils of the Damascus Ghouta. Geoderma. 2005;124(1-2):63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.04.003.

  • 38.

    Franco-Uria A, Lopez-Mateo C, Roca E, Fernandez-Marcos ML. Source identification of heavy metals in pastureland by multivariate analysis in NW Spain. J Hazard Mater. 2009;165(1-3):1008-15. [PubMed ID: 19070956]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.118.

  • 39.

    Acosta JA, Faz A, Martinez-Martinez S, Arocena JM. Enrichment of metals in soils subjected to different land uses in a typical Mediterranean environment (Murcia City, southeast Spain). Appl Geochem. 2011;26(3):405-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.01.023.

  • 40.

    Salonen VP, Korkka-Niemi K. Influence of parent sediments on the concentration of heavy metals in urban and suburban soils in Turku, Finland. Appl Geochem. 2007;22(5):906-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.02.003.

  • 41.

    Qing X, Yutong Z, Shenggao L. Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk in urban soils of steel industrial city (Anshan), Liaoning, Northeast China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;120:377-85. [PubMed ID: 26114257]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.06.019.

  • 42.

    Karim Z, Qureshi BA, Mumtaz M. Geochemical baseline determination and pollution assessment of heavy metals in urban soils of Karachi, Pakistan. Ecol Indic. 2015;48:358-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.032.

  • 43.

    Yuswir NS, Praveena SM, Aris AZ, Ismail SN, Hashim Z. Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal in Urban Surface Soil (Klang District, Malaysia). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;95(1):80-9. [PubMed ID: 25904089]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1544-2.

  • 44.

    Sayadi MH, Shabani M, Ahmadpour N. Pollution Index and Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in the Surface Soils of Amir-Abad Area in Birjand City, Iran. Health Scope. 2015;4(1):1-5. https://doi.org/10.17795/jhealthscope-21137.

  • 45.

    Kamani H, Ashrafi SD, Isazadeh S, Jaafari J, Hoseini M, Mostafapour FK, et al. Heavy metal contamination in street dusts with various land uses in Zahedan, Iran. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2015;94(3):382-6. [PubMed ID: 25573278]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-014-1453-9.

  • 46.

    Wei B, Yang L. A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem J. 2010;94(2):99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2009.09.014.

  • 47.

    Madrid L, Diaz-Barrientos E, Madrid F. Distribution of heavy metal contents of urban soils in parks of Seville. Chemosphere. 2002;49(10):1301-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00530-1.

  • 48.

    Xia X, Chen X, Liu R, Liu H. Heavy metals in urban soils with various types of land use in Beijing, China. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186(2-3):2043-50. [PubMed ID: 21242029]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.104.

  • 49.

    Figueiredo AMG, Tocchini M, dos Santos TFS. Metals in playground soils of São Paulo city, Brazil. Procedia Environ Sci. 2011;4:303-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2011.03.035.

  • 50.

    Imperato M, Adamo P, Naimo D, Arienzo M, Stanzione D, Violante P. Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban soils of Naples city (Italy). Environ Pollut. 2003;124(2):247-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0269-7491(02)00478-5.