Antibacterial and Antibiotic-Potentiation Activities of Levisticum officinale L. Extracts on Pathogenic Bacteria

authors:

avatar Azizollah Ebrahimi 1 , * , avatar Atefe Eshraghi 2 , avatar Mohamad Reza Mahzoonieh 1 , avatar Sharareh Lotfalian 1

Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, IR Iran
Department of Pathobiology, Veterinary College, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, IR Iran

how to cite: Ebrahimi A, Eshraghi A, Mahzoonieh M R, Lotfalian S. Antibacterial and Antibiotic-Potentiation Activities of Levisticum officinale L. Extracts on Pathogenic Bacteria. Int J Infect. 2017;4(2):e38768. https://doi.org/10.5812/iji.38768.

Abstract

Background:

Multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria have resistance to many antimicrobial compounds by multiple mechanisms including reduced outer membrane permeability, and active efflux mechanisms by efflux pumps.

Objectives:

The current study was planned to search the antibacterial activities of the ethanol and chloroform extracts of Levisticum officinale L., and their synergistic effects with ciprofloxacin against some Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria; also to analyze the extracts if they contain inhibitors of efflux pumps of the examined bacteria.

Materials and Methods:

After grinding, the resulting powder of Levisticum officinale L. was extracted with 85% ethanol and chloroform by maceration method. The studied microorganisms included the reference strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis. Broth micro-dilution methods were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the extracts alone or in association with ciprofloxacin and phenylalanine-arginine-β-naphtylamide (PAβN) as an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI). The presumptive efflux activity was detected by the ethidium bromide (EB) well diffusion method.

Results:

MIC determination indicated that the Levisticum officinale L. extracts inhibited the growth of all the studied bacteria within a concentration range of 3125 to 25000 μg/mL. The synergistic effects were noted between the Levisticum officinale L. extracts and ciprofloxacin on all tested bacteria. In S. enertidis and E. coli both extracts of L. officinale, but in P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii only ethanolic extract increased the amount of EB accumulation (i e, reduced efflux).

Conclusion:

The overall results of the current study provided information for the possible use of the Levisticum officinale L. extracts to control bacterial infections caused by the examined bacteria.

1. Background

Multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria have resistance to many antimicrobial compounds by multiple mechanisms including reduced outer membrane permeability, and active efflux mechanisms by efflux pumps.

Efflux pumps in pathogenic bacteria and their roles in excreting the entered antimicrobial agents to outer vicinity of the cell is one of several mechanisms that lead to bacterial drug resistances (1).

Reports show that efflux-based systems may play a role in fluoroquinolone resistance in Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria, affecting hospitalized patients (2). The result of over expression of these pumps in pathogenic bacteria is the emergence of pathogenic strains that are clinically resistant to many antimicrobial agents such as ciprofloxacin (3).

Some compounds, such as phenylalanyl-arginyl-beta-naphthylamide (PAßN) are known as efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) (4). PAßN selectively inhibit the efflux activities of a broad range of efflux pumps such as MexAB-OprM, MexEF-OprN, MexCD-OprJ and MexXY-OprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and AcrAB-TolC in some species of the Enterobacteriaceae (5).

It is reported that the extracts of some medicinal plants contain molecules that act as EPIs against the efflux pumps of bacteria (6).

Traditionally many medicinal plants are used in various parts of the world such as Iran to treat infections caused by pathogenic bacteria (7, 8).

Levisticum officinale L. is a perennial herb belonging to the Umbelliferae family, all parts of the plant are strongly aromatic, and its seeds, leaves and roots (fresh, powdered and as essential oils) are commonly used in foods and for their medicinal properties (9).

A report by Garvey et al. (10) indicates that extracts of some herbal medicinal plants contain inhibitors of efflux in Gram-negative bacteria, the most active compound falcarindiol, showed synergistic activity with ciprofloxacin extracted from Levisticum officinale L.

2. Objectives

The current study aimed to search the antibacterial activities of the ethanol and chloroform extracts of L. officinale L. in combination with ciprofloxacin as a fluoroquinolone representative against some Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria, and also analyze if the extracts contain inhibitors of efflux pumps of the examined bacteria.

3. Methods

Dried leaves and branches of L. officinale L. were purchased from local market in Shahrekord, Iran. After grinding, maceration method we used to prepare the extract. Briefly, 85% ethanol and chloroform were added to the powdered plant in conical flasks and left at room temperature for a period of two and three days for chloroform and ethanol solvents respectively. Daily filtration and refreshment of the solvent was followed for the ethanol extraction. But for chloroform solvent one stage filtration process was used. The collected filtrates were evaporated by incubating at 34°C, in the case of ethanol and in biolaminar safety hood in the case of chloroform solvents. All extracts were kept at 4°C until further investigations (11).

The studied microorganisms including the reference strains of P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027 and Acinetobacter baumannii NCTC 13305 provided by B. Zamanzad and A. Gholipour (department of microbiology at Shahrekord medical school), Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Salmonella enteritidis RTCC 2465 provided by H. Motamedi (department of microbiology, college of basic science, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran), were kept in Lauria Bertani (LB) broth at 4°C and sub-cultured on appropriate agar plates 24 hours prior to antimicrobial tests. Mueller Hinton broth (MHB) was used for all the antibacterial assays. Ciprofloxacin (Cip) and phenylalanine-arginine-β-aphthylamide (PAβN) (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich) were used as fluoroquinolone, microbial growth indicator and efflux pump inhibitor (EPI), respectively.

After a preliminary assay by tube-dilution method on the examined drugs against four standard bacterial strains, the MICs for drug combinations were determined following the double-serial micro-dilution method, according to guidelines of the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) (12). Briefly, the bacterial cultures were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 18 - 24 hours. The turbidity of the cultures was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL) and then diluted in saline solution to obtain an inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/well. The first well of each row in micro-plate was inoculated by four MIC of drug/drugs followed by double dilution in successive wells. The two last wells were considered as positive and negative controls.

The inoculated micro-plates were aerobically incubated by shaking for about 18 hours at 37°C. The lowest concentration that inhibits visible growth after incubation was defined as MIC. To verify synergistic activity of ciprofloxacin by the extracts, activity of ciprofloxacin in association with the extract was compared with that of ciprofloxacin plus PAßN (30 µg/mL in the prepared stock solution).

Interaction of drugs in combinations was calculated as the ratio of MICAntibiotic in combination/MICAntibiotic alone and the results were as follows: synergic (< 0.5), indifferent (0.5 to 4) or antagonist (> 4) (13, 14). All assays were performed in duplicate.

The effects on efflux pumps activity in synergistic drug combinations were evaluated by modification of Martins et al.’s protocol (15). Briefly, the examined strains were cultured as cross lines in four equals MHA plates and wells were created in cross lines using a sterile Burrell tip. of each MHA plate, one well was inoculated with 50 µL EB 6 mg/L and 50 µL distilled water, two wells with synergistic ethanolic or chloroform extracts plus EB, and one with PAβN plus EB (in each case 1 MIC concentration and 50 µL volume). Inoculated plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. An increase in the amount of EB accumulated in the presence of an EPI such as PAβN indicated inhibition of efflux (15). The fluorescence evaluation of EB excitation was made by UV light employing by Gel Doc image analysis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules) and results were recorded.

4. Results

Ethanol and chloroform extracts of L. officinale L. were examined to detect synergy with ciprofloxacin and possible EPI effects. The positive control was PAβN whose antimicrobial activity was also assayed on the examined strains (Table 1).

Table 1.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Ciprofloxacin and Phenylalanine-Arginine-β-Aphthylamide in the Absence and Presence of Levisticum officinale La

Combinati on BacteriaCip.Eth.E. + Cip.Eth.E.Ch.E.+ Cip.Ch.E.PAβNPaβN + Cip.
P. aeruginosab20.25125002231253.75
S. enteritidisc0.03120.00195500000.0039125007.50.0156
E. colid0.01560.00024500000.0009762507.50.0039
A. baumanniie8125000425003.758

The MICs of ethanolic and chloroform extracts and drug combinations against the examined bacteria are presented in Table 1. Of the investigated extracts, chloroform and ethanolic extracts showed the best activities against S. enteritidis and E. coli, respectively. By MIC determination, the extracts of L. officinale L. showed synergistic activity with ciprofloxacin against all the examined strains (Table 1).

An increase in the amount of EB, accumulated in the presence of an EPI such as PAβN indicates inhibition of efflux (12). To determine whether synergistic activity displayed by the extracts of L. officinale L. with ciprofloxacin, accumulation of EB in the presence and absence of 1 MIC of the chloroform and ethanol extracts of L. officinale was done for the tested strains.

In S. enertidis and E. coli, both extracts of L. officinale L. increased the amount of EB accumulation (i e, reduced efflux). In P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii only the ethanolic extract showed synergy with ciprofloxacin and EB accumulation, but PAβN did not reduce the MIC of ciprofloxacin (Table 1).

5. Discussion

There is continued clinical pressure for novel approaches to combat antibiotic-resistances and identify new antimicrobials to treat resistant bacterial infections. Screening plants for natural products with efflux pump inhibiting properties was a successful approach (15, 16).

Therefore, the present study examined L. officinale ethanolic and chloroform extracts to evaluate the suggested efflux inhibition activities.

It is reported that the examined bacterial strains tested with a combination of L. officinale extracts; ciprofloxacin and PAβN all contain multidrug resistance efflux pumps (3, 15).

It appears that extracts of L. officinale L. inhibited the growth of all tested bacterial strains within a concentration range of 3125 - 25000 μg/mL. The lowest MIC value (3125 μg/mL) was obtained with the chloroform extract of L. officinale L. against P. aeruginosa.

Reports show that other plant extracts contain compounds that inhibit efflux pump activity or have antibacterial activity (17). It is also reported that essential oil of a Corsican plant, Helichrysum italicum, reduced the MIC of chloramphenicol against Enterobacter aerogenes, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa (17).

In terms of antibiotic-potentiation activity of ciprofloxacin, the chloroform and ethanolic extracts of L. officinale L. showed the best activities against S. enteritidis and E. coli, respectively. As ciprofloxacin is a substrate of many bacterial efflux pumps (13), many reports indicate activity of other plant extracts that synergized with this agent (18).

In the presence of ciprofloxacin, significant increase of L. officinale extracts activity was noted against S. enteritidis and E. coli compared with that of PAβN plus ciprofloxacin; it shows that at least one active compound of this plant, acting inside the bacterial cell could be the powerful substrate of efflux pumps of S. enteritidis and E. coli. Since ciprofloxacin is a substrate of many bacterial efflux pumps (1), many reports indicate the activity of other plant extracts that synergized with this agent (18).

The observation is suggesting that the association of L. officinale L. extracts and fluoroquinolones could be helpful to fight against infections due to S. enteritidis and E. coli. The synergistic effects of L.officinale extracts with different antibiotics noted on other bacteria are also suggesting that some of their constituents can act as efflux pump inhibitors (19).

PAβN had no effect on MIC of ciprofloxacin in P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii, but the association of extracts decreased it, this may imply that the extracts of L. officinale L. may also act by damaging cell membrane or cell wall of the bacteria and thereby facilitate the penetration of ciprofloxacin into bacterial cell (20, 21).

Samiee et al. (22) reported that the methanolic extract of L. officinale L. is rich in monoterpenes compounds that damage cell biomembranes.

Also, some reports show that falcarindiol a fraction of the chloroform extracts of L. officinale L., and some other medicinal plants strongly inhibit the growth of different species of bacteria (10, 19). In addition to its antibacterial property, this polyacetylene exhibits various biological activities such as antifungal and cytotoxic properties (19).

However, more detailed studies on active constituents and phytochemical properties of L. officinale L. are suggested to evaluate the mechanisms of its antibiotic potentiation.

Overall, it can be suggested that the association of L. officinale extracts and fluoroquinolones could be helpful to fight against infections based on the tested strains. The synergistic effects of L. officinale extracts with different antibiotics noted on other bacteria also suggest that some of their constituents can act as efflux pump inhibitors (10).

5.1. Conclusion:

The present investigation provides primary information for the possible use of L. officinale L. in association with fluoroquinolones to combat at least some Gram-negative pathogens.

References

  • 1.

    Piddock LJ. Clinically relevant chromosomally encoded multidrug resistance efflux pumps in bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(2):382-402. [PubMed ID: 16614254]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.19.2.382-402.2006.

  • 2.

    Ardebili A, Talebi M, Azimi L, Rastegar Lari A. Effect of Efflux Pump Inhibitor Carbonyl Cyanide 3-Chlorophenylhydrazone on the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Ciprofloxacin in Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(1):8691. [PubMed ID: 25147654]. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.8691.

  • 3.

    Blot S, Depuydt P, Vandewoude K, De Bacquer D. Measuring the impact of multidrug resistance in nosocomial infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007;20(4):391-6. [PubMed ID: 17609598]. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e32818be6f7.

  • 4.

    Lamers RP, Cavallari JF, Burrows LL. The efflux inhibitor phenylalanine-arginine beta-naphthylamide (PAbetaN) permeabilizes the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):60666. [PubMed ID: 23544160]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060666.

  • 5.

    Dreier J, Ruggerone P. Interaction of antibacterial compounds with RND e ffl ux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:660. [PubMed ID: 26217310]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00660.

  • 6.

    Stavri M, Piddock LJ, Gibbons S. Bacterial efflux pump inhibitors from natural sources. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(6):1247-60. [PubMed ID: 17145734]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl460.

  • 7.

    Jalali H, Nejad AM, Ebadi AG, Laey G. Ethnobotany and folk pharmaceutical properties of major trees or shrubs in northeast of Iran. Asian J Chem. 2009;21(7):5632-8.

  • 8.

    Nejad AS, Kamkar A, Giri A, Pourmahmoudi AA. Ethnobotany and folk medicinal uses of major trees and shrubs in Northern Iran. J Med Plants Res. 2013;7(7):284-9.

  • 9.

    Cu J-Q,, Pu F, Shi Y, Perineau F, Delmas M, Gaset A. The chemical composition of lovage headspace and essential oils produced by solvent extraction with various solvents. J Essent Oil Res. 1990;2(2):53-9.

  • 10.

    Garvey MI, Rahman MM, Gibbons S, Piddock LJ. Medicinal plant extracts with efflux inhibitory activity against Gram-negative bacteria. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;37(2):145-51. [PubMed ID: 21194895]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.027.

  • 11.

    Azwanida N. A Review on the extraction methods use in medicinal plants, principle, strength and limitation. J Med Aromat Plants. 2015;4:196.

  • 12.

    Wayne P. Clinical and Laboratory Standarts Institute: Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that grow Aerobically. USA; 2006.

  • 13.

    Shahverdi AR, Monsef-Esfahani HR, Tavasoli F, Zaheri A, Mirjani R. Trans-cinnamaldehyde from Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark essential oil reduces the clindamycin resistance of Clostridium difficile in vitro. J Food Sci. 2007;72(1):55-8. [PubMed ID: 17995898]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00204.x.

  • 14.

    Braga LC, Leite AA, Xavier KG, Takahashi JA, Bemquerer MP, Chartone-Souza E, et al. Synergic interaction between pomegranate extract and antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus. Can J Microbiol. 2005;51(7):541-7. [PubMed ID: 16175202]. https://doi.org/10.1139/w05-022.

  • 15.

    Martins M, McCusker MP, Viveiros M, Couto I, Fanning S, Pages JM, et al. A Simple Method for Assessment of MDR Bacteria for Over-Expressed Efflux Pumps. Open Microbiol J. 2013;7:72-82. [PubMed ID: 23589748]. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874285801307010072.

  • 16.

    Tegos G, Stermitz FR, Lomovskaya O, Lewis K. Multidrug pump inhibitors uncover remarkable activity of plant antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(10):3133-41. [PubMed ID: 12234835].

  • 17.

    Lorenzi V, Muselli A, Bernardini AF, Berti L, Pages JM, Amaral L, et al. Geraniol restores antibiotic activities against multidrug-resistant isolates from gram-negative species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(5):2209-11. [PubMed ID: 19258278]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00919-08.

  • 18.

    Piddock LJ, Garvey MI, Rahman MM, Gibbons S. Natural and synthetic compounds such as trimethoprim behave as inhibitors of efflux in Gram-negative bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(6):1215-23. [PubMed ID: 20304975]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq079.

  • 19.

    Meot-Duros L, Cerantola S, Talarmin H, Le Meur C, Le Floch G, Magne C. New antibacterial and cytotoxic activities of falcarindiol isolated in Crithmum maritimum L. leaf extract. Food Chem Toxicol. 2010;48(2):553-7. [PubMed ID: 19922760]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.031.

  • 20.

    Karsha PV, Lakshmi OB. Antibacterial activity of black pepper (Piper nigrum Linn.) with special reference to its mode of action on bacteria. Indian J Nat Prod Resour. 2010;1(2):213-5.

  • 21.

    Ono T, Kashimura M, Suzuki K, Oyauchi R, Miyachi J, Ikuta H, et al. In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of the tricyclic ketolide TE-802 and its analogs. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2004;57(8):518-27. [PubMed ID: 15515889].

  • 22.

    Samiee K, Akhgar MR, Rustaiyan A, Masoudi S. Composition of the volatiles of Ferulago carduchorum Boiss. et Hausskn. and Levisticum officinale Koch. obtained by hydrodistillation and extraction. J Essent Oil Res. 2006;18(1):19-22.