article information

Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products: Vol.11, issue 1; e24594
published online: February 20, 2016
article type: Research Article
received: October 18, 2014
revised: May 10, 2015
accepted: May 20, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-24594
Crossmark

Inhibition of Aldose Reductase and Sorbitol Accumulation by Hydroalcoholic Extract of Propolis

authors:

avatar Mohammad Aberomand 1 , avatar Maliheh Parvank 1 , avatar Ghorban Mohammadzadeh 2 , * , avatar Zahra Ramezani 3

Toxicology Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran
Hyperlipidemia Research Center, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran
Toxicology Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran

how to cite: Aberomand M, Parvank M, Mohammadzadeh G, Ramezani Z. Inhibition of Aldose Reductase and Sorbitol Accumulation by Hydroalcoholic Extract of Propolis. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2016;11(1):e24594. https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-24594.

Abstract

Background:

Increased polyol pathway activity and subsequent occurrences, and particular sorbitol accumulation are noticed in the development of various secondary complications of diabetes. Aldose reductase (ALR2) or aldo-ketoreductase (AKR1B1) as the first and rate limiting enzyme of this pathway is a good target for new drugs for diabetes complications. A good inhibitor should inhibit aldehyde reductase (ALR1), the other member of this family lesser than ALR2. Bee propolis is a known substance in ancient medicine, but its effect on polyol pathway is unknown.

Objectives:

The current study aimed to investigate the effect of hydroalcoholic extract of propolis (HAEP) on partial purified bovine lens ALR2, also the effect of HAEP on sorbitol accumulation in human erythrocytes in high-glucose condition (ex vivo).

Materials and Methods:

Total protein was determined by lowery method. Bovine lens ALR2 was partially purified by gel filtration chromatography on sephadexTM G25. Bovine cortex kidney ALR1 was partially purified by diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) precipitation. The hydroalcoholic extract was obtained from frozen propolis. The enzyme activity and sorbitol accumulation in erythrocytes were determined spectroflourimetrically.

Results:

It was found that ethyl acetate (EthAc) fraction (the more potent fraction) of HAEP inhibited ALR2 by IC50 value of 1.12 mg/mL up to 50% and this fraction can inhibit ALR2 8.25-fold greater than ALR1. In addition, it was found that this fraction could decrease sorbitol accumulation in human erythrocytes under high-glucose condition.

Conclusions:

The obtained results indicated that propolis may be a good candidate for more studies to find new drugs for the treatment of secondary complications of diabetes.

1. Background

The polyol pathway is a two-step metabolic pathway in which glucose by aldose reductase (ALR2 or AKR1B1; EC: 1.1.1.21) in presence of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) is reduced to sorbitol, which is then converted to fructose by sorbitol dehydrogenase and nicotinamide riboside (NAD+) as cofactor (1). Polyol pathway is one of the best candidates that can be responsible for diabetes chronic complications due to cellular toxicity of hyperglycemia since: (I), it becomes active when intracellular concentration of glucose is increasing (2-4); (II), both enzymes of this pathway have presence in human tissues that diabetes complications appear (5);. (III), products of this pathway and changes in cofactors balance can be proponent of the cellular stress that occurs in diabetes (6, 7) and some studies have shown the relationship between increased activity of ALR2 and diabetes chronic complications (8-10). ALR2 is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in polyol pathway, therefore, it is considered as an important potential therapeutic against diabetes chronic complications (11-13). A number of ALR2 inhibitors (ARI) have shown the potency of attenuation or prevention of diabetes chronic complications in animal models (14, 15), and some of them have been investigated in clinical trials (16, 17), but yet most of them have limited success and some of them have severe side effects and low target penetrating (13, 18-20). The most current classes of synthetic ARI evaluated in phase-III trials are carboxylic acid inhibitors (zopolrestat, ponalrestat and tolerestat) and spiroimide inhibitors (sorbinil); the former have shown low target permeability and are not efficacious in vivo and the latter although have better target penetrating ability but, have shown skin reaction and liver toxicity (15, 21, 22). Aldehyde reductase (ALR1; EC: 1.1.1.2) is another member of aldo-ketoreductase (AKR) family and is very similar to ALR2 in sequence, structure and reaction. ALR1 plays a role in reactive aldehyde detoxification (23-25). Unspecific inhibition is one of the restrictions of ARIs and a good inhibitor should inhibit ALR2 more than ALR1 (24, 25). Due to this reason, studies should continue to find an effective ARI. Propolis is a Greek word that means defense from city and is a resinous material that honey bees make and use in hives for sealing hive imports and protection of hives against pathogen microorganisms (26, 27). Propolis chemical compositions are very complex and closely related to plant species that honeybees are nourishing. So far, more than 300 of its compounds are identified. The main chemical classes found in propolis are flavonoids, phenolic, tannin and various aromatic compounds. In addition, propolis contains many of the B-complex vitamins, important minerals and trace elements (28). Propolis is used by humans in folk medicine from ancient times and numerous studies have shown its anti-cancer (29-31), free radical scavenging activity (32), anti-inflammatory (31), antimicrobial (14, 15), and antioxidant (32) properties.

2. Objectives

The current study aimed to evaluate the inhibition of partial purified bovine lens ALR2 by hydroalcoholic extract of propolis (HAEP); characterize the selectivity of HAEP for ALR2 inhibition compared with ALR1,and also investigate the effect of HAEP on intracellular sorbitol accumulation in human red blood cells (RBCs) under high-glucose condition (ex vivo).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

SephadexTM G25, DEAE-cellulose, NADPH, NAD+, sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) (sheep liver), D-sorbitol, DL-glyceraldehyde, D-glucose, Krebs ringer bicarbonate buffer, 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Tris-HCl and ammonium sulfate were purchased from sigma chemical company. All other materials were obtained from Merck Company.

3.2. Isolation of Aldose Reductase from Bovine Lens

Bovine eyes were collected from Ahvaz slaughterhouse. Lenses were isolated rapidly on the ice and then stored at -70°C for next processes. Lenses were mechanically homogenized at 4°C in five volumes of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, and containing 2ME (5 mM). Then the homogenate was centrifuged) centrifuge, Damon-USA (at 10000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C. Supernatant was separated and then adjusted to 60% saturation by adding ammonium sulfate slowly whereas stirring (stirrer: RH basic 2IKA®) on ice, this mixture was kept at 4°C overnight, then centrifuged at 10000 g for 30minutes; then the supernatant was adjusted to 70% and 85% saturation by ammonium sulfate similar to the previous stage. After centrifuging of the 85% solution, supernatant was discarded and the pellet was dissolved in a minimum volume of the above buffer. Then, solution was dialyzed against 5 liters of the same buffer overnight at 4°C. After dialysis, the enzyme was concentrated against solid sucrose. Ammonium sulfate and sucrose were then removed by chromatography on sephadexTM G25.

3.3. Purification of Aldehyde Reductase from Bovine Kidney

Bovine cortex kidney ALR1 was partially purified. Briefly, cortex was separated from fresh bovine kidney and then homogenized mechanically in three volumes of 10m M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 0.25 M sucrose, 2 mM EDTA and 2.5 mM 2ME. The homogenate was centrifuged at 10000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C. Then, supernatant was subjected to ammonium sulfate precipitation. The precipitate was obtained at 45% and then 75% in a procedure similar to that of ALR2. The pellet of 75% solution was dissolved in minimum volume of sodium phosphate buffer and dialyzed against 5 liters of the same buffer overnight at 4°C. DEAE-52 resin (31 mg/mL) was added to the dialysis product on stirrer at 4°C gently and then, removed by centrifugation. The supernatant was used as the source of ALR1.

3.4. HAEP Preparation from Raw Propolis

Propolis sample was obtained from honeybee hives, located in Kermanshah, Iran. 100 g of frozen propolis was grained and dissolved in 70% ethanol (25 g/mL). This mixture was kept in the incubator at 37°C for two weeks in a dark bottle with continuous stirring. After this period, suspension was filtered twice with Whatman number 4. The final filtered solution was dried by freeze-dryer to obtain crude HAEP. HAEP was dissolved in water, ethanol (EthOH), ethyl acetate (EthAc), CH2Cl2, n-hexane and chloroform at 1 mg/mL final concentration.

3.5. Enzyme Assay

The activity of ALR2 and ALR1 were assayed spectrophotometrically (UV visible spectrophotometer, RH basic 2IKA®, Unico-USA) by measuring the decrease of NADPH absorption at 340 nm as a function of time at 37°C, using glyceraldehyde as substrate. Total protein in the enzyme preparations was determined according to lowery method. The assay mixture in 1ml contained equal units of enzyme, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.2), 10 mM DL-glyceraldehyde, and 0.3 mM NADPH, with or without inhibitor. The reaction was initiated by adding glyceraldehyde and incubated for 5 minutes at 37°C and stopped by adding 0.5 N hydrochloric acid and then the change in the absorbance was calculated. For inhibition studies, HAEP in the mentioned solvent was tested and the best solvent was selected for subsequent stages.

3.6. In Vitro Incubation of RBC

Venous blood (5 mL) was collected in glass tubes containing 10.5 mg of EDTA. RBCs were separated by centrifugation and washed three times with isotonic saline at 4°C. Washed RBCs were suspended in Krebs-ringer bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.4. Duplicate samples were incubated at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2 for three hours under normal (5.5 mM) and high (55 mM) glucose conditions. The effect of HAEP on sorbitol accumulation was evaluated by incubating RBCs with 1mg/ml of the selected fraction of HAEP in the enzyme inhibition process.

3.7. Estimation of Sorbitol in RBC

Distilled water, 5 mL, was added to 1 mL of RBCs (washed RBC after incubation) and the mixture was shaken vigorously for 10 seconds to lyse the cells. After that, 1 mL of ZnSO4 solution (0.3 M) and 1 mL of NaOH solution (0.475 M) were added to the cell-lysate to precipitate proteins. The supernatant was separated by 10 minutes centrifugation at 2000 g. The sorbitol content of the supernatant was measured by a fluorometric method.

3.8. Statistical Analysis

All the statistical analyses were performed by SPSS software version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago IL, USA). The results were presented as mean ± SD of three independent replicates. Mean differences of the three independent replicates were determined by non-parametric method. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4. Results

Fractions obtained from HAEP were assessed for inhibitory activity against partially purified bovine lens ALR2 in vitro (Table 1). At 1 mg/mL concentration, EThAc fraction showed the highest inhibitory activity against ALR2 with 38% inhibition. The 50% inhibition value of this fraction was measured 1.12 mg/mL (Figure 1). Sorbinil was used as positive control and standard cure of its inhibitory effect on the AR2 is presented in Figure 2.

Table 1.

Aldose Reductase Activity in Hydroalcoholic Extracta

SolventAldose Reductase Inhibition, %
Water8.17 ± 0.76
Eth-OH14.21 ± 2.26
EthAc38.31 ± 1.4
CH2Cl24.1 ± 0.63
Chloroform7.38 ± 0.7
n-Hexane2.6 ± 1.21

aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.

Representative Inhibition Curve of Partially Purified Bovine Lens ALR2 by HAEP
ALR2 activity in the absence of HAEP was considered as 100%. Data are average of three independent experiments. y= 33.675x + 12.029, R2 = 0.9899.

ALR2 activity in the absence of HAEP was considered as 100%. Data are average of three independent experiments. y= 33.675x + 12.029, R2 = 0.9899.

Figure 1.

Representative Inhibition Curve of Partially Purified Bovine Lens ALR2 by HAEP

Representative Inhibition Curve of Partially Purified Bovine Lens ALR2 by Sorbinil as Positive Control
ALR2 activity in the absence of HAEP was considered as 100%. Data are average of three independent experiments. y = 5.1219x - 8.5213, R2 = 0.9002.

ALR2 activity in the absence of HAEP was considered as 100%. Data are average of three independent experiments. y = 5.1219x - 8.5213, R2 = 0.9002.

Figure 2.

Representative Inhibition Curve of Partially Purified Bovine Lens ALR2 by Sorbinil as Positive Control

Specificity was assessed in terms of selectivity ratio based on the 50% inhibitory capacity value of EthAc fraction of HAEP for ALR2 and then this concentration was tested to appoint the inhibition rate of ALR1 (2). It was investigated that EthAc fraction inhibited ALR2 8.25-fold more potent than ALR1, which showed its good specificity toward ALR2 over ALR1 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Specificity of HAEP Against ALR2 and ALR1a

InhibitorALR2 Inhibition, No. (%)ALR1 Inhibition, (Mean ± SD)Selectivity Ratio (ALR2/ALR1
HAEP (1.12) mg/ml)506.06 ± 1.058.25

aN = 3.

The current study investigated the effect of EthAc fraction of HAEP at ALR2 50% inhibition value on the accumulation of sorbitol in fresh human erythrocytes under high glucose condition (ex vivo), (Table 3). Sorbitol accumulation was 3.63-fold greater when RBCs were incubated in high-glucose condition (55 mM), compared to their incubation in a normal glucose condition (5.5 mM). EthAc fraction of HAEP in ALR2 50% inhibition value leads to decrease in sorbitol level in high-glucose condition amounting to 46.6%. Sorbinil was used as positive control. In negative control tube, everything was similar to test tube except that solvent was added instead of HAEP.

Table 3.

Effect of HAEP on Intracellular Red Cell Sorbitol Levela

Groups Sorbitol (nmol/mL)
Glucose 5.5 mM66.3 ± 0.2b
Glucose 55 mM240 ± 0.13b,c
Glucose 50mM + HAEP (1.2 mg/mL)112.01 ± 0.11c
Glucose 50 mM + sorbinil (10.84 µM) (Positive Control)76.8 ± 0.48
Glucose 50 mM + EthAc (Negative. Control)228.32 ± 0.17

aValues are in μM/mL RBC and are an average of three different experiments; Values are expressed as means ± SD for n=2.

bP value < 0.05 which indicates a statistically significant difference with the glucose 50 mM group (Kruskal–Wallis).

cindicates a statistically significant difference with the glucose 50 mM group (Kruskal–Wallis).

5. Discussion

Propolis is a traditional medicine from ancient times and has anti-cancer (29-31), free radical scavenging activity (32), anti-inflammatory (31), antimicrobial (32) and antioxidant (32) properties attributed to presence of flavonoids and phenolic compounds present in all kinds of propolis (32-35). The effect of propolis on ALR2 inhibition is not studied yet. Lens is known to have the highest ALR2 activity compared to other tissues (36); the current study investigated the effect of HAEP on bovine lens ALR2 inhibition and to test the physiological efficiency investigated the ability of HAEP to block ALR2 activity in fresh human erythrocytes, ex vivo. Among human AKRs, ALR2 is unique in this ability to catalyze the NADPH-dependent conversion of glucose to sorbitol (37) and activation of ALR2 in RBCs such as lens, retina, nerve and kidney can cause the accumulation of sorbitol (38). A study showed direct correlation between erythrocyte ALR2 activity and sorbitol level (39). The primary structure of ALR2 shows high similarities with ALR1. Both ALR1 and ALR2 are catalyzing the reduction of biogenic aldehydes and NADPH-dependent reaction of a variety of carbonyls such as glyceraldehyde, glucoronate and short-chain alkanes (25, 37). Therefore, the study also investigated the specificity of ethyl acetate fraction of HAEP with ALR1 and ALR2 and showed that HAEP is preferred for AR2 inhibition. The results of the current study showed that EthAc fraction of HAEP inhibited bovine lens AR2 with IC50 value 1.12 mg/mL. It was shown that EthAc fraction of the extract could inhibit ALR2 8.25-fold more potent than ALR1, which is good specificity compared to ALR2 over ALR1. Sorbitol accumulation was 3.63-fold greater when RBCs were incubated in high-glucose condition (55 mM), compared to their incubation in a normal glucose condition (5.5 mM). EthAc fraction of HAEP in ALR2 50% inhibition value led to decrease in sorbitol level in high-glucose condition amounting to 46.6%, therefore HAEP not only showed good and specific inhibition for AR2, but also showed inhibitory power in physiologic condition. P. Suryanarayana et al. showed that aqueous extracts of Emblica officinalis inhibited rat lens and recombinant human AR2 with IC50 values 0.72 and 0.88 mg/mL, respectively. Further, they demonstrated that the hydrolysable tannoids of E. officinalis were responsible for AR2 inhibition, as enriched tannoids of E. officinalis exhibited remarkable inhibition against both rat lens and human AR2 with IC50 of 6 and 10 μg/mL, respectively. The inhibition of AR2 by E. officinalis tannoids is 100 times higher than its aqueous extract. Activation of AR2 and increased sorbitol levels due to hyperglycemic stress were prevented when lenses were incubated with 55 mM glucose in the presence of 50 μg/mL tannoids in the medium (36). Rutin, a bioflavonoid present in many dietary sources, inhibited ALR2 with an IC50 value of 13 μM in an uncompetitive manner, but was a poor inhibitor of closely related members of the AKR superfamily, particularly ALR1. Moreover, rutin was able to suppress sorbitol accumulation in human erythrocytes under high glucose conditions, demonstrating an in vivo potential of rutin to prevent sorbitol accumulation (40). The various fractions from the methanol extract of Smilax herbacea were tested for their effects on rat lens aldose reductase in vitro. Among them, the ethyl ethanoate (EtOAc) fraction exhibited a potent rat lens aldose reductase inhibition (IC50_0.75m g/mL). Also when effective compound of this extract was administered orally at 25 mg/kg in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats, reduced sorbitol accumulation in the lenses, RBCs, and sciatic nerves (18). All of the above studies had IC50 value less than the current study, but it should be considered that their data were for effective compound of their extract, while the current study data were only based on raw extract. Therefore, their lowest IC50 could not necessarily represent better inhibitory activity than that of the current study extract. Indeed, a logical comparison needs more studies to recognize and utilize HAEP effective compound in another project; while the current study only meant to show the ALR2 inhibitory property of propolis, qualitatively.

5.1. Conclusion

Hydroalcholic extract of propolis is suggested as a good inhibitor for aldose reductase, in addition it has the antioxidant property and free radical scavenging activity and certain side effects that have not been reported yet. Therefore, with the possibility of mass production, it can be studied further to identify and synthesize compounds for aldose reductase inhibitions. Since the active ingredient of the current study extract was not purified and raw extract was used as inhibitor, it necessary to conduct more studies on this fraction.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Cumbie BC, Hermayer KL. Current concepts in targeted therapies for the pathophysiology of diabetic microvascular complications. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(6):823-32. [PubMed ID: 18200803].

  • 2.

    Gabbay KH. The sorbitol pathway and the complications of diabetes. N Engl J Med. 1973;288(16):831-6. [PubMed ID: 4266466]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197304192881609.

  • 3.

    Oates PJ. Polyol pathway and diabetic peripheral neuropathy. 2002;50:325-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-7742(02)50082-9.

  • 4.

    Lorenzi M. The polyol pathway as a mechanism for diabetic retinopathy: attractive, elusive, and resilient. Exp Diabetes Res. 2007;2007:61038. [PubMed ID: 18224243]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/61038.

  • 5.

    Dagher Z, Park YS, Asnaghi V, Hoehn T, Gerhardinger C, Lorenzi M. Studies of rat and human retinas predict a role for the polyol pathway in human diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes. 2004;53(9):2404-11. [PubMed ID: 15331552].

  • 6.

    Barnett PA, Gonzalez RG, Chylack LJ, Cheng HM. The effect of oxidation on sorbitol pathway kinetics. Diabetes. 1986;35(4):426-32. [PubMed ID: 3956880].

  • 7.

    Williamson JR, Chang K, Frangos M, Hasan KS, Ido Y, Kawamura T, et al. Hyperglycemic pseudohypoxia and diabetic complications. Diabetes. 1993;42(6):801-13. [PubMed ID: 8495803].

  • 8.

    Crabbe MJ. Aldose reductase inhibitors and cataract. Int Ophthalmol. 1991;15(1):25-36. [PubMed ID: 1901300].

  • 9.

    Hayman S, Kinoshita JH. Isolation and Properties of Lens Aldose Reductase. J Biol Chem. 1965;240:877-82. [PubMed ID: 14275148].

  • 10.

    Varma S, Mizuno A, Kinoshita J. Diabetic cataracts and flavonoids. Science. 1977;195(4274):205-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.401544.

  • 11.

    Van Zandt MC, Sibley EO, McCann EE, Combs KJ, Flam B, Sawicki DR, et al. Design and synthesis of highly potent and selective (2-arylcarbamoyl-phenoxy)-acetic acid inhibitors of aldose reductase for treatment of chronic diabetic complications. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12(21):5661-75.

  • 12.

    Tomlinson DR, Stevens EJ, Diemel LT. Aldose reductase inhibitors and their potential for the treatment of diabetic complications. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994;15(8):293-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-6147(94)90010-8.

  • 13.

    Kim JK, Lee YS, Kim SH, Bae YS, Lim SS. Inhibition of aldose reductase by phenylethanoid glycoside isolated from the seeds of Paulownia coreana. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34(1):160-3. [PubMed ID: 21212537].

  • 14.

    Raskin P, Rosenstock J. Aldose reductase inhibitors and diabetic complications. Am.J Med. 1987;83(2):298-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90702-9.

  • 15.

    Pfeifer MA, Schumer MP, Gelber DA. Aldose reductase inhibitors: the end of an era or the need for different trial designs? Diabetes. 1997;46 Suppl 2:S82-9. [PubMed ID: 9285505].

  • 16.

    Saab N. Phenylsulfonylnitromethanes as potent irreversible inhibitors of aldose reductase. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1999;34(9):745-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0223-5234(99)00219-6.

  • 17.

    Lim SS, Jung SH, Ji J, Shin KH, Keum SR. Synthesis of flavonoids and their effects on aldose reductase and sorbitol accumulation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat tissues. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2001;53(5):653-68. [PubMed ID: 11370705].

  • 18.

    Lee YS, Lee S, Lee HS, Kim BK, Ohuchi K, Shin KH. Inhibitory effects of isorhamnetin-3-O-beta-D-glucoside from Salicornia herbacea on rat lens aldose reductase and sorbitol accumulation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat tissues. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28(5):916-8. [PubMed ID: 15863906].

  • 19.

    Richeti F, Noronha RM, Waetge RT, de Vasconcellos JP, de Souza OF, Kneipp B, et al. Evaluation of AC(n) and C(-106)T polymorphisms of the aldose reductase gene in Brazilian patients with DM1 and susceptibility to diabetic retinopathy. Mol Vis. 2007;13:740-5. [PubMed ID: 17563730].

  • 20.

    Abhary S, Burdon KP, Laurie KJ, Thorpe S, Landers J, Goold L, et al. Aldose reductase gene polymorphisms and diabetic retinopathy susceptibility. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(8):1834-6. [PubMed ID: 20424224]. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1893.

  • 21.

    Bhatnagar A, Srivastava SK. Aldose reductase: Congenial and injurious profiles of an enigmatic enzyme. Biochem Med Metab Biol. 1992;48(2):91-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-4505(92)90055-4.

  • 22.

    Kador PF, Robison WJ, Kinoshita JH. The pharmacology of aldose reductase inhibitors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1985;25:691-714. [PubMed ID: 3923907]. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pa.25.040185.003355.

  • 23.

    El-Kabbani O, Carbone V, Darmanin C, Oka M, Mitschler A, Podjarny A, et al. Structure of aldehyde reductase holoenzyme in complex with the potent aldose reductase inhibitor fidarestat: implications for inhibitor binding and selectivity. J Med Chem. 2005;48(17):5536-42. [PubMed ID: 16107153]. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm050412o.

  • 24.

    Srivastava SK, Petrash JM, Sadana IJ, Ansari NH, Partridge CA. Susceptibility of aldehyde and aldose reductases of human tissues to aldose reductase inhibitors. Curr Eye Res. 1982;2(6):407-10. [PubMed ID: 6820339].

  • 25.

    Spite M, Baba SP, Ahmed Y, Barski OA, Nijhawan K, Petrash JM, et al. Substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency of aldo-keto reductases with phospholipid aldehydes. Biochem J. 2007;405(1):95-105. [PubMed ID: 17381426]. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20061743.

  • 26.

    Zia M, Mannani R, Mahmoodi M, Bayat M, Mohaghegh F. The effects of alcoholic extract of propolis obtained from Iran bee hives on the growth of Trichophyton mentagrophytis, Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton verrucosum. J Isfahan Med.Sch. 2009;27(95):232-41.

  • 27.

    Sonmez S, Kirilmaz L, Yucesoy M, Yucel B, Yilmaz B. The effect of bee propolis on oral pathogens and human gingival fibroblasts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;102(3):371-6. [PubMed ID: 16084044]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.06.035.

  • 28.

    Kolankaya D, Selmanoglu G, Sorkun K, Salih B. Protective effects of Turkish propolis on alcohol-induced serum lipid changes and liver injury in male rats. Food Chemistry. 2002;78(2):213-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(01)00400-9.

  • 29.

    Talas ZS, Gulhan MF. Effects of various propolis concentrations on biochemical and hematological parameters of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2009;72(7):1994-8. [PubMed ID: 19428108]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.04.011.

  • 30.

    Bankova V. Chemical diversity of propolis and the problem of standardization. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;100(1-2):114-7. [PubMed ID: 15993016]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.05.004.

  • 31.

    Mohammadzadeh S, Sharriatpanahi M, Hamedi M, Amanzadeh Y, Sadat Ebrahimi SE, Ostad SN. Antioxidant power of Iranian propolis extract. Food Chemistry. 2007;103(3):729-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.014.

  • 32.

    Tavares DC, Mazzaron Barcelos GR, Silva LF, Chacon Tonin CC, Bastos JK. Propolis-induced genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2006;20(7):1154-8. [PubMed ID: 16682170]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2006.02.009.

  • 33.

    Aljadi AM, Kamaruddin MY. Evaluation of the phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of two Malaysian floral honeys. Food Chemistry. 2004;85(4):513-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00596-4.

  • 34.

    Meda A, Lamien C, Romito M, Millogo J, Nacoulma OG. Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity. Food Chemistry. 2005;91(3):571-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.006.

  • 35.

    Buratti S, Benedetti S, Cosio MS. Evaluation of the antioxidant power of honey, propolis and royal jelly by amperometric flow injection analysis. Talanta. 2007;71(3):1387-92. [PubMed ID: 19071462]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2006.07.006.

  • 36.

    Suryanarayana P, Kumar PA, Saraswat M, Petrash JM, Reddy GB. Inhibition of aldose reductase by tannoid principles of Emblica officinalis: implications for the prevention of sugar cataract. Mol Vis. 2004;10:148-54. [PubMed ID: 15031705].

  • 37.

    Crosas B, Hyndman DJ, Gallego O, Martras S, Pares X, Flynn TG, et al. Human aldose reductase and human small intestine aldose reductase are efficient retinal reductases: consequences for retinoid metabolism. Biochem J. 2003;373(Pt 3):973-9. [PubMed ID: 12732097]. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20021818.

  • 38.

    Morrison AD, Clements RJ, Winegrad AI. Effects of elevated glucose concentrations on the metabolism of the aortic wall. J Clin Invest. 1972;51(12):3114-23. [PubMed ID: 4640951]. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107138.

  • 39.

    Reddy GB, Satyanarayana A, Balakrishna N, Ayyagari R, Padma M, Viswanath K, et al. Erythrocyte aldose reductase activity and sorbitol levels in diabetic retinopathy. Mol Vis. 2008;14:593-601. [PubMed ID: 18385795].

  • 40.

    Reddy GB, Muthenna P, Akileshwari C, Saraswat M, Petrash JM. Inhibition of aldose reductase and sorbitol accumulation by dietary rutin. Current Science. 2011;101(9):1191-7.