Evaluating the Effects of Silymarin on Expressing SBDSP1 and CASC11 Genes in HCT116 Colon Cancer Cells

authors:

avatar Masoumeh Heshmati 1 , * , avatar Nazila Hasani-Reza Abad 2 , avatar Sanaz Pashapour 3

Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Pharmaceutical Sciences Center, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Heshmati M, Hasani-Reza Abad N, Pashapour S. Evaluating the Effects of Silymarin on Expressing SBDSP1 and CASC11 Genes in HCT116 Colon Cancer Cells. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2022;26(2):e122802. https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-122802.

Abstract

Background:

Numerous studies have proven that silymarin can fight cancer, but the results remain controversial.

Objectives:

This study aimed to determine the expression levels of SBDSP1 and CASC11 genes in HCT116 colon cancer cells to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of silymarin.

Methods:

This study was conducted on HCT 116 cell lines, which were divided into groups treated with 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 μg/mL silymarin and control group. The silymarin cytotoxicity was checked using the MTT assay, and the apoptosis induction rate was determined using the annexin (An)-V/PI kit and flow cytometry. The real-time PCR was also used to examine the expression of the CASC11 and SBDSP1 genes. The data were compared using one-way analysis of variance between groups.

Results:

The cell survival was reduced based on concentration and time, and IC50 concentrations were observed in 30.94, 41.50, and 46.41 μg/mL at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. In addition, the treatment with IC50 concentration significantly increased in apoptosis after 48 hours compared to the control. A decrease in expression of CASC11 and SBDSP1 genes was observed in HCT116 cells treated with IC50 concentrations after 24 and 48 hours.

Conclusions:

According to the results, silymarin, as an active substance, declines survival, induces apoptosis, and reduces the expression of SBDSP1 and CASC11 genes on the HCT-116 colon cancer cell line based on concentration and time.

1. Background

Several studies have been recently published directly and indirectly on the effects of herbal medicines extracted from natural sources on lncRNA (1-3). In addition to regulating gene expression, lncRNAs participate in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, survival, proliferation, differentiation, and migration (4-6). lncRNAs play an important role in metastasis and invasion of cancer cells. In recent years, colorectal cancer (CRC) has become increasingly prevalent and many people die from this disease each year. The lack of early detection and unknown molecular mechanisms are two factors leading to high mortality (7-10). The role of lncRNAs in developing and progressing colon cancer has recently been discovered (11-17). In a study, Zhang et al. found that hnRNP-K targeting increased nuclear β-catenin accumulation and activated the β-catenin-Wnt pathway in CRC patients, which increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion (12). Another study found a significant increase in SBDSP1 expression in CRC tissues comparing CRC tissues with normal tissues. SBDSP1 increases the function of Akt and ERK1,2 pathways, and SBDSP1 silencing reduces the viability and the expression of cyclin D1, and thus stops the cell cycle in G0/G1 phase in cancer cells. Another study found that increased LINC00460 expression increased colon cancer cell proliferation, cell division, and tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, decreased E-cadherin expression and increased vimentin and N-cadherin expression induced EMT (13). Wang et al. showed that the ROR1-AS1 level increased significantly in colon cancer tissues and cell lines at stages 4 and 3 in comparison to stages 1 and 2, enhanced cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis inhibition, and suppressed DUSP5/CDKN1A expression (14).

Medicinal plants produce active ingredients, such as curcumin, paclitaxel, silibinin, gambogic acid, genistein, which inhibit cancer cell survival, migration, invasion, and metastasis by altering the function of long noncoding RNAs and increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (1-3). Silymarin is a flavonoid compound derived from the Silybum marianum plant, which contains the three main isomers of silibinin, silydianin, and silychristin with the most significant effects of the plant on this category of substances. In vitro and in vivo studies have revealed that silymarin and silibinin have anti-cancer properties (18).

There is a CASC11 gene on chromosome 8q24, 2.1 kb upstream of c-Myc, and a SBDSP1 gene on chromosome 11q37. The expression level of these lncRNAs increases in patients with CRC, depends on tumor size, lymph metastasis, and serous invasion (TNM staging) (19), and their inhibition prevents the proliferation and metastasis of colon cancer cells (19). There are few studies on the effects of silymarin on CASC11 and SBDSP1. This study evaluated the effect of silymarin on gene expression and induction of cell apoptosis by CASC11 and SBDSP1 lncRNAs in the HCT-116 colon cancer cell line.

2. Methods

In this study, fetal bovine serum (FBS), DMEM medium, penicillin, streptomycin, MTT assay dye, trypan blue, and other high purity reagents were obtained by Sigma, and Barij Essence Company prepared Silymarin in powder form.

2.1. Cell Culture

The cells used in this study came from the Pasteur Institute (Tehran, Iran) Cell Bank’s HCT-116 colon cancer cell line, which are related to the human colon. These cells were cultured in a DMEM medium containing 100 mL L-glutamine, 10% FBS, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 g/L streptomycins, located in incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.

2.2. Incubation of Cells with Different Concentrations of Silymarin

The cells were treated with Silymarin, purchased from Barij Essence Company. Simultaneously, purchased silymarin powder was prepared in sterile DMSO solution at 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 μg/mL.

2.3. Evaluation of Silymarin Cytotoxicity by MTT Assay

MTT colorimetric method was used to evaluate the effect of Silymarin on the growth and proliferation of normal and cancer cells based on the ability of live cells to convert tetrazolium salts to insoluble formazan.

HCT-116 cells were cultured in a 96-well plate with 103 × 6 cells in each well in 200 μL of DMEM medium and three wells serving as the untreated control group.

Cells were treated at 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 μg/mL for 24, 48, and 72 hours after 24 hours of incubation at 37°C. The supernatant was removed at the end of the treatment period, and 50 microliters of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) were poured into each well. Then, 100 μL of DMSO solvent were added to each well. ELISA measured the light absorption of the samples at 570 nm after 15 minutes of incubation at room temperature and complete dissolution of the crystals. Experiments were performed in triplicate to increase work productivity and comparative study.

2.4. Evaluating the Induction of Cellular Apoptosis Using Annexin/PI Kit

Studying phosphatidylserine molecules on the outer surface of the membrane is one of the ways to evaluate apoptosis during the apoptotic process. The presence of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the cell surface, which is usually present in the plasma membrane, is one of the early signs of apoptosis. Phosphatidylserine moves from the cytoplasmic surface of the plasma membrane to the extracellular surface during apoptosis. Ca2+ ions strongly bind annexin (An)-V, which can therefore be used as an apoptosis marker in the presence of Ca2+ ions.

The percentage of apoptosis and necrosis was determined using a bioscience diagnostic kit. The cells were incubated in a 6-well plate in the DMEM medium containing 10% bovine fetal serum and 5% CO2 at 37°C for 24 hours. Then, concentrations lower than the IC50 determined were added to the wells three times by the MTT method, and incubation lasted for 48 hours. Phosphate-buffered saline PBS was used to wash the cells twice after treatment. PI and An-V were added to the cell suspension in the binding buffer. The cells were incubated for 37 minutes at 37°C in the dark and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences FACS CalibureTM).

2.5. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

The YT9080 kit was used to extract total RNA, and the YT4500 kit was utilized to synthesize cDNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantitative real-time PCR was performed in triplicate using QPCR Master MIX SYBR Green I (amplicon). A normalized GAPDH gene was used as an endogenous control gene, and results were analyzed using the ∆∆CT-2 (Livak) method. The sequence of primers used in qRT-PCR was used according to Table 1 (11, 20). All real-time reactions were performed using an ABI-step one device.

Table 1.

The Sequence of Real-Time PCR Primers Specific for GAPDH, CASC11, and SBDSP1 Genes

GenePrimer Sequence
CASC11Forward: 5’-GGACACCAACTATTGCTTCA-3’
Reverse: 5’-TCCAGGCTCCAAATGTAGG-3’
SBDSP1Forward: 5’-GCTTCTGGGTCTTTGAACAGCC-3’
Reverse: 5’-TTGGCAACCTGACCTTAGGAAAC-3’
GAPDHForward: 5’-AGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTG-3’
Reverse: 5’-GACTCATGACCACAGTCCATGC-3’

2.6. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 8.3.0 Software, one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were used for statistical analysis and graphs. The mean difference of the data was considered significant (P ≤ 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Evaluation of Cell Cytotoxicity by MTT Assay

The MTT test results showed that silymarin treatment increases in cell death in HCT-116 colon cancer cells, depending on the concentration and time.

In Figure 1, the survival rate of HCT-116 cancer cells was lower at all concentrations and times when compared to the control group. The survival percentage decreased significantly in the concentration range of 0 - 500 g/mL at 24 and 48 hours (P 0.001), as well as at 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 g/mL at 72 hours (P 0.001, P 0.01). During 24 hours of treatment, the highest survival rate was observed at a concentration of 6.25 g/mL (97.49%), while the lowest survival rate was observed at 500 g/mL (9.106%) during 72 hours of silymarin treatment. The level of IC50 in the HCT-116 cancer cell line in MTT at 24, 48, and 72 hours was observed 141.8, 91.73, and 47.52 μg/ml, respectively.

The cytotoxicity percentage of silymarin with MTT test at 24, 48, and 72 hours
The cytotoxicity percentage of silymarin with MTT test at 24, 48, and 72 hours

3.2. Results of Apoptosis with Annexin/PI Kit

Figures 2 and 3 indicate a significant increase in apoptosis percentages of 16.53 ± 1.5 (P = 0.24) and 21.05 ± 1.79 (P = 0.05) in treatment with IC50 concentrations for 24 and 48 hours, respectively, compared to the control (10.33 ± 0.86). In addition, the percentage of necrosis in silymarin treatment increased by 58.3 ± 0.46 (P = 0.924) and 4.920 ± 0.572 (P = 0.743) for 24 and 48 hours, respectively, compared to the control, (2.180 ± 0.63). In addition, a significant decrease was observed in survival at 79.9 ± 5.5.312 (P = 0.128) and 74.7 ± 2.714 (P < 0.01) compared to the control (87.5 ± 4.33).

The comparison of the effects of silymarin on the percentage of HCT-116 cell line apoptosis and necrosis at IC50 concentrations for 24 and 48 hours
The comparison of the effects of silymarin on the percentage of HCT-116 cell line apoptosis and necrosis at IC50 concentrations for 24 and 48 hours
The percentage of cells in different phases of annexin (An)-V/PI test in HCT-116 cell line for 24 and 48 hours. A, Control; B, treatment at IC50 concentration for 24 hours; C, treatment at IC50 concentration for 48 hours; Q1: marker of An-/pI+ necrosis cells, Q2: marker of An+/pI+ delayed apoptotic cells, Q3: primary apoptotic marker of An+/pI-, Q4: An-/pI- live cells
The percentage of cells in different phases of annexin (An)-V/PI test in HCT-116 cell line for 24 and 48 hours. A, Control; B, treatment at IC50 concentration for 24 hours; C, treatment at IC50 concentration for 48 hours; Q1: marker of An-/pI+ necrosis cells, Q2: marker of An+/pI+ delayed apoptotic cells, Q3: primary apoptotic marker of An+/pI-, Q4: An-/pI- live cells

3.3. Results of Evaluating Gene Expression

As shown in Figure 4 the expression of the SBDSP1 gene decreased by 1.3 times compared to the control group in 24 hours. In addition, the expression of SBDSP1 and CASC11 genes decreased significantly by 2 and 1.8 times compared to the control group in 48 hours, respectively (P ≤ 0.05).

Changes in CASC11 and SBDSP1 gene expression in silymarin-treated HCT-116 cell line at IC50 concentrations for 24 and 48 hours
Changes in CASC11 and SBDSP1 gene expression in silymarin-treated HCT-116 cell line at IC50 concentrations for 24 and 48 hours

4. Discussion

In this study, silymarin-treated cells significantly decreased the survival percentage and increased the percentage of apoptosis. The lncRNA expression of SBDS1 and CASC11 RNAs significantly decreased when compared to the control group. A number of cancers have been associated with an increase in the expression of CASC11 and SBDSP1 lncRNAs (11, 13). Oncogenic lncRNAs inhibit tumor inhibitors or induce antiapoptotic regulators. Su et al. found an increase in CASC11 and CDK1 expression in gastric cancer cells and tissues and a link between increased CASC11 expression and tumor size, TNM stage, cellular apoptosis inhibition, and increased cell cycle progression (21). Another study reported an increased CASC11 expression in ovarian cancer tissues and cells and its relationship with a decrease in mir-182, inhibition of cellular apoptosis, and increased cell proliferation (22). Zhang et al. reported an increase in CASC11 in CRC patients, which activated the β-catenin/Wnt pathway by raising the accumulation of nuclear β-catenin and enhancing cell proliferation, migration, and invasion (12). Zhou et al. concluded that the relative expression of SBDSP1 is significantly increased in CRC tissues compared to normal ones (15). The increase in relative expression is associated with invasive symptoms of cancer cells. Silencing the SBDSP1 gene reduced viability, increased cessation of cancer cells in G0/G1 phase, and inhibited the expression of D1 genes in CRC samples with metastatic nodes. According to in vivo studies, the decrease in SBDSP1 expression reduces and delays the growth of xenograft tumors in colon cancer (15).

Herbal drugs such as curcumin, silibinin, genistein, resveratrol, berberine, paclitaxel, and others have been shown to interact with lncRNAs and their functional regulation (1-3).

These plant compounds directly or indirectly affect the expression of lncRNAs by interacting with miRNAs, protein kinases, enzymes, and transcription factors, modulating the expression of lncRNAs leads to inhibition of survival, proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, and transmitting from the epithelium to mesenchyme of cancer cells (1-3).

On the other hand, Zhang et al. reported the effect of CASC11 on increasing the Wnt/B catenin pathway activity by hnRNP-K targeting (12). Therefore, the results of previous studies are consistent with the present study based on the effect of silymarin in reducing the expression of CASC11 genes, decreasing cell proliferation, and increasing apoptosis in the HCT-116 cell line (12).

In the current study, silymarin inhibited colon cancer cell proliferation by affecting the expression of the SBDSP1 and CASC11 genes. The present study has limitations regarding the effect of silymarin on tumor suppressor expression of genes, caspases, and measuring free radicals and cell cycle in colon cancer cells. The results of this study can be used to determine the effects of silymarin on the expression of lncRNA genes associated with colon cancer and prevent their expression.

The results of previous studies and the current findings suggest that silymarin inhibits CASC11 and SBDSP1 in HCT-116 cells, which should be explored further. Herbal medicine interactions with lncRNA provide valuable information for identifying treatment strategies for diseases associated with a sudden increase in lncRNAs, and they need to be investigated further.

4.1. Conclusions

According to the results, SBDSP1 and CASC11 lncRNAs are overexpressed in colon cancer cell lines and tissues. Silymarin is a flavonoid extracted from the plant S. marianum with anti-cancer properties by regulating messaging pathways and interacting with lncRNAs in various cancers (1-3). This study found that silymarin treatment reduced cell proliferation, increased apoptosis, and decreased expression of oncogene long noncoding RNAs SBDSP1 and CASC11. Consequently, silymarin could control the function of lncRNAs.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Budisan L, Gulei D, Zanoaga OM, Irimie AI, Sergiu C, Braicu C, et al. Dietary Intervention by Phytochemicals and Their Role in Modulating Coding and Non-Coding Genes in Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6). [PubMed ID: 28587155]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5486001]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061178.

  • 2.

    Rathinasamy B, Velmurugan BK. Role of lncRNAs in the cancer development and progression and their regulation by various phytochemicals. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;102:242-8. [PubMed ID: 29567536]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.077.

  • 3.

    Mishra S, Verma SS, Rai V, Awasthee N, Chava S, Hui KM, et al. Long non-coding RNAs are emerging targets of phytochemicals for cancer and other chronic diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(10):1947-66. [PubMed ID: 30879091]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7775409]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03053-0.

  • 4.

    Peng WX, Koirala P, Mo YY. LncRNA-mediated regulation of cell signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(41):5661-7. [PubMed ID: 28604750]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6450570]. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.184.

  • 5.

    Hu Q, Ye Y, Chan LC, Li Y, Liang K, Lin A, et al. Oncogenic lncRNA downregulates cancer cell antigen presentation and intrinsic tumor suppression. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(7):835-51. [PubMed ID: 31160797]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6619502]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-019-0400-7.

  • 6.

    Rahmani Z, Mojarrad M, Moghbeli M. Long non-coding RNAs as the critical factors during tumor progressions among Iranian population: an overview. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:6. [PubMed ID: 31956395]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6961246]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-020-0373-0.

  • 7.

    Pashapour S, Heshmati M, Mousavi Z, Esmaeili S. The effects of methanolic extract of the aerial parts of Galium verum on HT29 and AGO cell lines. Nucleus. 2021;65(2):223-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-021-00380-1.

  • 8.

    Wdowiak A, Farahmandlou N, Tajik A, Pashapour S, Ahmadi R. The Cytotoxic Effect of Estradiol Valerate, Progesterone, and Testosterone on Brain Glioblastoma (A172), Colorectal Cancer (HT29) and Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK293) Cells and the Expression Levels of Bax, Bcl-2, and KAI-1/CD82 in A172 and HT29 cells. Journal of Biological Studies. 2021;4(3):106-19.

  • 9.

    Pashapour S, Heshmati M, Mousavi Z, Esmaeili S. The Cytotoxicity of the Chloroform and Petroleum Ether Fractional Extracts of Galium verum L. in HepG2 and HT29 Cell Lines. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2020;24(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums.101079.

  • 10.

    Pashapour S, Heshmati M, Mousavi Z, Esmaeili S. Effect of whole methanolic extract of Galium verum on AGO cell line. Toxicol Commun. 2022;4(2). https://doi.org/10.53388/20220202010.

  • 11.

    Shi D, Liang L, Zheng H, Cai G, Li X, Xu Y, et al. Silencing of long non-coding RNA SBDSP1 suppresses tumor growth and invasion in colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;85:355-61. [PubMed ID: 27890432]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.036.

  • 12.

    Zhang Z, Zhou C, Chang Y, Zhang Z, Hu Y, Zhang F, et al. Long non-coding RNA CASC11 interacts with hnRNP-K and activates the WNT/beta-catenin pathway to promote growth and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;376(1):62-73. [PubMed ID: 27012187]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2016.03.022.

  • 13.

    Hong W, Ying H, Lin F, Ding R, Wang W, Zhang M. lncRNA LINC00460 Silencing Represses EMT in Colon Cancer through Downregulation of ANXA2 via Upregulating miR-433-3p. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;19:1209-18. [PubMed ID: 32069703]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7019044]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2019.12.006.

  • 14.

    Wang XY, Jian X, Sun BQ, Ge XS, Huang FJ, Chen YQ. LncRNA ROR1-AS1 promotes colon cancer cell proliferation by suppressing the expression of DUSP5/CDKN1A. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(3):1116-25. [PubMed ID: 32096171]. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202002_20162.

  • 15.

    Zhou HB, Li Q, Liu M, Cao YQ, Xu JY. Increased expression of long non-coding RNA SBDSP1 correlates with poor survival in colorectal cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017;21(17):3837-41. [PubMed ID: 28975982].

  • 16.

    Kalmar A, Nagy ZB, Galamb O, Csabai I, Bodor A, Wichmann B, et al. Genome-wide expression profiling in colorectal cancer focusing on lncRNAs in the adenoma-carcinoma transition. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1059. [PubMed ID: 31694571]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6836529]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6180-5.

  • 17.

    Bermudez M, Aguilar-Medina M, Lizarraga-Verdugo E, Avendano-Felix M, Silva-Benitez E, Lopez-Camarillo C, et al. LncRNAs as Regulators of Autophagy and Drug Resistance in Colorectal Cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1008. [PubMed ID: 31632922]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6783611]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01008.

  • 18.

    Ramasamy K, Agarwal R. Multitargeted therapy of cancer by silymarin. Cancer Lett. 2008;269(2):352-62. [PubMed ID: 18472213]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2612997]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.053.

  • 19.

    Hsu W, Liu L, Chen X, Zhang Y, Zhu W. LncRNA CASC11 promotes the cervical cancer progression by activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Biol Res. 2019;52(1):33. [PubMed ID: 31255182]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6599525]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-019-0240-9.

  • 20.

    Chen SG, Wang CH, He RQ, Xu RY, Ji CB. LncRNA CASC11 promotes the development of esophageal carcinoma by regulating KLF6. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(20):8878-87. [PubMed ID: 31696474]. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201910_19283.

  • 21.

    Su X, Zhang J, Luo X, Yang W, Liu Y, Liu Y, et al. LncRNA LINC01116 Promotes Cancer Cell Proliferation, Migration And Invasion In Gastric Cancer By Positively Interacting With lncRNA CASC11. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:8117-23. [PubMed ID: 31632064]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6781852]. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S208133.

  • 22.

    Cui Y, Shen G, Zhou D, Wu F. CASC11 Overexpression Predicts Poor Prognosis and Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Ovarian Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:523-9. [PubMed ID: 32158258]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6985985]. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S226801.