Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis

Authors

Fatemeh Pak, Tina Nafariyeh, Nabiullah Asghari, Mahdie Shokrollahi, Parviz KokhaeiParviz Kokhaei ORCID,*
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Koomesh:Vol. 14, issue 2; 117-129
Published online:Feb 25, 2013
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jan 04, 2012
Accepted:Jul 02, 2012
How to Cite:Pak F, Nafariyeh T, Asghari N, Shokrollahi M, Kokhaei P. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. koomesh. 2013;14(2):e152557. doi:

Abstract

  Multiple sclerosis (MS), an inflammatory disorder of central nervous system (CNS), is the most common cause of neurological disability especially in young adults. The disorder results from interplay between unidentified genetic and environmental factors. In MS, cells of immune system attack myelin, progressive loss of certain body function and physical ability occur. In severe cases, the progression of disease leads to permanent damage. The auto-reactive peripheral CD4+ T cells recognize auto-antigen within CNS parenchyma and polarize toward Th1 phenotype. Activated Th1 cells cause myelin disruption and release of new potential CNS auto- antigen. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interferon- g , TNF- a and chemokines which is secreted by Th1 cells induce additional unspecific inflammatory cells and specific anti myelin antibody-forming B cells that amplify tissue injury. Finally, the apoptotic death of the T cells or conversion of the T cells toward Th2 phenotype positively modulates the outcome of the lesions in CNS .   Clinical manifestation of the disease is classified in three types, primary: direct damage (weakness, tremors, tingling,etc) secondary: result of primary (paralysis lead to bedsores and bladder/urinary incontinence problems) tertiary: social, psychological and vocational complication (depression is very common).   The aims of treatment are: reduction of sickness attack (by corticosteroid, interferon beta 1b and 1a, glatriamer acetate, natalizumab, etc) and reduction of the disorder. The prospect of the potential tools to prevent MS is tempting, yet challenging to investigate studies about roll of vitamin D in reduction of development of disease. Intensive research on MS provides a promising prospective of the disease management in the future.

Highlights

Copyright

© 2013, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

19
May
2011

Connective tissue diseases mimicking multiple sclerosis

Maryam Moghaddassi-Jahromi,
Mohammad Ali Sahraian

Moghaddassi-Jahromi M, Sahraian MA. Connective tissue diseases mimicking multiple sclerosis. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2011;13(6):e93828. doi:

12
Mar
2013

Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis

Mohammad Ali Sahraian,
Farnaz Etesam

Sahraian MA, Etesam F. Cognitive Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2013;16(1):. doi:

19
May
2021
Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Inflammatory Markers in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Inflammatory Markers in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Shima Mehrabadi,
Elham Zahedi

Mehrabadi S, Zahedi E. Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Inflammatory Markers in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Arch Mil Med. 2021;9(1):e112426. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm.112426

19
Sep
2011

Comparing the Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Mahvash Raghibi,
masume khosravy

Raghibi M, khosravy M. Comparing the Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2012;14(2):e93580. doi:

More by these authors

Fatemeh PakPubMedScholar
Tina NafariyehPubMedScholar
Nabiullah AsghariPubMedScholar
Mahdie ShokrollahiPubMedScholar
Parviz KokhaeiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics