The Relationship Between Internet Addiction and General Health in Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences-Iran, 2015: A Cross Sectional Study

authors:

avatar Maryam Kazemi Naeini 1 , avatar Morteza Hajhosseini 2 , avatar Hamid Abbasi 3 , avatar Ghodratollah Roshanaei ORCID 4 , *

M.Sc in Biostatistics, Student Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
M.Sc in Biostatistics, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
PhD Student, Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
PhD in Biostatistics, Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

how to cite: Kazemi Naeini M, Hajhosseini M, Abbasi H, Roshanaei G. The Relationship Between Internet Addiction and General Health in Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences-Iran, 2015: A Cross Sectional Study. Mod Care J. 2016;13(4):e12584. https://doi.org/10.5812/modernc.12584.

Abstract

Objectives:

The Internet is a global system that is increasingly used by the public, especially university students, as a useful tool to access information sources. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between Internet addiction and general health in students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, during year 2015.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 650 students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, west of Iran, during year 2015. The participants were volunteers and were selected by stratified sampling. The data collection tool was the Young internet addiction test and general health questionnaire (GHQ28). Data was analyzed by logistic regression and analysis of variance methods.

Results:

Mean age of students was 22 ± 4.01 years old. The mean score of Internet addiction was 77.08 ± 17.24 and mean score of general health was 59.38 ± 9.54. Analysis of variance method showed that the score of all general health aspects (except social functioning) was increased significantly in the addicted group in comparison with normal and suspected groups (all Ps < 0.001). In addition, risk of internet addiction in females was 1.81 (95% CI: 1.3 - 2.5) times more than males. Pearson correlation coefficients showed that internet addiction score increased in the same direction as all general health aspects (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Results showed that overuse of the Internet is causing serious problems for general health in students of medical universities.

1. Background

The Internet is the most advanced new communication technology, which involves multiple links and access to a variety of data sources (1). The number of Internet users in Iran was over 36 million people in 2015, which has increased to nearly 39 million in 2016 (2). There is no doubt that every new development, which may have many benefits, could also cause problems; one of the main problems of the Internet is addiction (3). Social pathologists and psychologists believe that excessive use of the Internet could cause physical and mental problems (4-6). General health is defined as physical, mental, and social health that are subscales of the Goldberg general health questionnaire (7). The study of Saraji and Sheikhi Fini showed that Internet addiction and general health, specially mental health, have a significant relationship in high school students, and addiction to the internet effects academic achievement (8).

Addiction is a disease, in which the patient’s continually repeat behaviors that have bad effects. American psychological association defines Internet addiction as a pattern of Internet use that could impair performance and lead to unpleasant moods over a period of two months; they offered seven criteria (at least three criteria during two months) in this regard including, withdrawal symptoms, extra time of Internet use more than expected, persistent desire to control the behavior, considerable time spent on the Internet; reduced social activities, employment and recreational use of the Internet, and continued use despite awareness of its negative effects (9). Young believes that Internet addicted is a person, who has lost control of his/her daily activity and is generally being online more than 38 hours a week (6).

In a cross-sectional study, performed by Ko et al., it was shown that addicted adults showed aggressive behaviors for one year after addiction and seniors had worse conditions in comparison to juniors (10). The study of Jafary et al., which evaluated the correlation between Internet addiction and public health, conducted on students of the Qom University of Medical Sciences in 2010 to 2011, revealed no significant relationship between Internet addiction and public health. The desired level of general health status was observed in users, who had mild level of addiction to the Internet (11). In addition, in the study of Kawabe et al. in 2016 on 12- to 15-year-old high school students in Japan, Internet addicted students had high general health scores (12). Another study on Internet addiction and its psychological effects performed on nursing students in Gaza and Palestine in 2014 showed a positive and significant relationship between Internet addiction and psychological effects (13). Gholamian conducted a study on high school students in Shahrekord and showed that the mean score of anxiety, depression, and stress among users of Internet addiction was significantly higher than ordinary Internet users (14).

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between Internet addiction and general health among students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences during year 2015.

2. Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 650 students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, located in the west of Iran, during year 2015. The participants were volunteers that were selected by stratified sampling. Initially, 30 questionnaires were randomly assigned to students to calculate reliability, which was 0.86. Stratified sampling method with proportional allocation was performed according to the total number of students in each faculty. Sample size was calculated as 704 subjects based on Lashgarara et al.’s study (15) with prevalence of 0.34 and type I error equal to 0.05. At the beginning of the study, 704 people were identified as samples, yet after collecting information and excluding incomplete questionnaires, 650 questionnaires (92%) remained with the least missing information for proper analysis.

After obtaining permission from the research council of Hamandan University of Medical Science, written contest was obtained from all students. The data collection tool was a questionnaire including demographic information, such as gender, education level, age, status of residence, and marital status. General Health Assessment Questionnaire (GHQ28) was used to assess the general health of the students (7). The reliability and validity of the Persian version was approved by Nazifi et al. (2014) (16). The questionnaire included sub-scales, including the somatic symptoms scale (items 1 to 7), anxiety and sleep disturbance symptoms scale (items 8 to 14), the scale of social functioning (items 15 to 21), and symptoms of depression scale (items 22 to 28). Each question was scored on a Likret scale from 0 to 3; in each subscale scores above 6 and a total score of above 22 indicated a disorder. To assess Internet addiction, the Young Internet Addiction Test was used; the reliability and validity of the Persian version of this scale was investigated by Alavi et al. (2012) (17). The questionnaire contains 20 items with minimum and maximum scores of 20 and 100, respectively. Scores are classified in three groups, including normal users (scores between 20 and 49), users who are suspected of Internet addiction (scores between 50 and 79), and addicts (scores between 80 and 100).

The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software version 24. Means (SD), frequencies, and percentages were used to report descriptive characteristics. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and homogeneity of variances were checked and confirmed for each aspect. Analysis of variance method with Tukey’s post hoc was performed to compare means of different general health aspects in Internet addiction levels. Moreover, binary logistic regression model (0 normal or suspected, 1 addiction) was used to determine the effect of each variable on the risk of internet addiction. P values of < 0.05 were consider significant. The Ethics Committee of Hamedan University of Medical Sciences approved the ethical considerations of the present study under No B/16/35/9/241.

3. Results

In this study mean ± SD of age of students was 22 ± 4.01 years old. The mean score of Internet addiction was 77.08 ± 17.24 and mean score of general health was 59.38 ± 9.54. Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of the study population by level of addiction.

Table 1.

Frequency and Percentage of Demographic Variables in Different Internet Addiction Categories

VariablesGroupNormalAt RiskAddictedTotal
Case of addiction, No. (%)52 (8.0)244 (37.5)336 (51.7)632
GenderMale28 (54.9)109 (46.4)111 (33.6)248 (40.3)
Female23 (45.1)126 (53.6)219 (66.4)368 (59.7)
Age groups20 ≥15 (30.6)76 (32.6)115 (35.5)206 (34)
25 - 2132 (65.3)131 (56.2)170 (52.5)333 (55.0)
26 ≤2 (4.1)26 (11.2)39 (12)67 (11.1)
Marital statusSingle44 (88)215 (91.1)291 (88.4)550 (89.4)
Married6 (12)21 (8.9)38 (11.6)65 (10.6)
Education levelBsc24 (44)100 (42.3)190 (57.4)314 (50.8)
Msc and Medical Student17 (34)110 (46.6)123 (37.2)250 (40.5)
PhD9 (18.0)26 (11)18 (5.4)53 (8.6)
Status of residenceNative21 (42)69 (29.4)109 (33.1)199 (32.4)
dormitory23 (46)152 (64.7)195 (59.3)370 (60.3)
Rented home6 (12)14 (6)25 (7.6)45 (7.3)

Analysis of variance method followed by Tukey’s post hoc showed that the score of all general health aspects (except social functioning) increased significantly in the addicted group in comparison with normal and suspected groups (P < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Mean General Health Aspects in Different Internet Addiction Categories

AspectInternet AddictionANOVA Test
NormalSuspectedAddictedFP Value
Somatic symptoms14.34 (3.5)14.27 (3.3)15.6 (2.6)a,b14.85< 0.001
Anxiety and sleep disturbance13.7 (4.1)13.4 (4.1)15.3 (3.8)a,b17.16< 0.001
Social functioning12.1 (4.0)12.7 (3.7)12.9 (3.8)1.190.356
Symptoms of depression15.3 (4.0)16.0 (4.4)17.7 (3.8)a,b22.65< 0.001
General health55.6 (1.4)56.5 (9.8)62.0 (8.3)a,b31.10< 0.001

Table 3 shows binary logistic regression, which determines the effect of each qualitative and quantitative variable on the risk of Internet addiction. The results showed that risk of Internet addiction in females was 1.81 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.5, P < 0.001) times more than males. Pearson correlation coefficients showed that Internet addiction score increased in the same direction with all general health aspects (P < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 3.

Binary Logistic Regression Indicating the Effect of Each Variable on the Risk of Internet Addiction

VariableGroupCoefficientSEOR (95% CI)WaldP Value
GenderMaleRefRef1RefRef
Female0.590.161.81 (1.3 - 2.5)12.8< 0.001
Age groups20 ≥RefRef1RefRef
25 - 21-0.190.170.82 (0.5 - 1.1)1.10.281
26 ≤0.100.281.1 (0.6 - 1.9)0.10.733
Marital statusSingleRefRef1RefRef
Married-0.220.20.800.70.397
Education levelBScRefRef1RefRef
MSc1.541.14.6 (0.4 - 45.5)1.70.183
Medical Student1.061.12.9 (0.3 - 28.3)0.80.359
PhD0.431.21.5 (0.1 - 15.9)0.10.716
Status of residenceNativeRefRef1RefRef
dormitory-0.080.10.9 (0.6 - 1.3)0.20.637
Rented home0.030.31.0 (0.5 - 1.9)0.010.924
Table 4.

correlation Among General Health Aspects and Internet Addiction

VariablesAddictionGeneral HealthSomatic SymptomsAnxiety and Sleep DisturbanceSocial FunctioningSymptoms of Depression
Addiction1-----
General health0.35 (< 0.001)1---
Somatic symptoms0.25 (< 0.001)0.71 (< 0.001)1---
Anxiety and sleep disturbance0.25 (< 0.001)0.78 (< 0.001)0.50 (< 0.001)1--
Social functioning0.05 (0.164)0.22 (< 0.001)-0.02 (0.531)-0.20 (< 0.001)1-
Symptoms of depression0.31 (< 0.001)0.77 (< 0.001)0.43 (< 0.001)0.61 (< 0.001)-0.18 (< 0.001)1

4. Discussion

The majority of Internet users are university students. This cross-sectional study aimed at determining the relationship between Internet addiction and general health in students of Hamadan University of Medical, during year 2015. This study was performed on 650 university students from various faculties of University of Medical Sciences.

The results showed that 7.4% of students were normal users and most of the students, 49.8%, were addicted users. Gholamian et al. revealed that among 417 high school students, 69.5% were normal, 27.6% had mild addition and 2.9% were addicted (14). Moreover, Internet addiction in females was more than males and the risk of developing Internet addiction in females was 1.81 times that of males. In other studies, there were significant differences between genders in terms of Internet addiction. Hosseini et al.’s study, which aimed at assessing the rate of Internet addiction among 1500 male and female students at 6 public universities of Tehran during year 2011, including Tehran, Allameh, Amir Kabir, Sharif, Science and Technology, and Al Zahra University, showed that from 9.8% of students had severe addiction; 5.9% were females and 3.8% males (18). In cotrast, Alhajjar studied Internet addiction and psychological morbidity among nursing students in Gaza-Palestine and showed that male students had higher Internet addiction scores than females (13).

In this study, academic level, residency, marital status, and age had no significant effect on Internet addiction. Bakhshayesh et al.’s study indicated similar results among female students living in Yazd University dormitories (19). Fayazbakhsh et al. (20) showed that more than half of the students (55%) believed that the use of the Internet reduced their physical activity, 33% developed inappropriate eating habits, 31% felt tired and bored. Also, results showed that Internet addiction score increased in the same direction with all general health aspects. Several studies confirm the current results (12-14). Gholamian et al.’s study showed that anxiety, depression, and stress were significantly higher in Internet addicted users (14). Nasti Zaii’s study showed similar results in students of Sistan and Baluchestan University (21). However, Jahanian et al. indicated that internet addiction have inverse significant relationships with students’ mental health in Alborz province, Iran (22).

One other alarming result of this study is the high frequency of medical sciences university students, who are addicted to the Internet. The results of this study indicate the relationship between Internet addiction and public health. This relationship is an alarm to cultural authorities of the university to provide necessary measures in use of Internet and awareness of Internet addiction dangers in their executive programs.

Limitations of study were the cross-sectional design and weakness in determining the extent of influence of other related factors on general health risk factors because of the unavailability of information.

4.1. Conclusion

According to the findings, it is suggested that a comprehensive information program should be designed, which focuses on the impact of the Internet on health and lifestyle, in addition to raising awareness. Also, planning educational programs is required to promote awareness of the adverse effects of the Internet, to monitor and control Internet use among university students, as well as raise awareness of the damaging effects of incorrect use of the Internet.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Ozturk FO, Ekinci M, Ozturk O, Canan F. The relationship of affective temperament and emotional-behavioral difficulties to internet addiction in Turkish teenagers. ISRN Psychiatry. 2013;2013:961734. [PubMed ID: 23738226]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/961734.

  • 2.

    Brown K. Internet society global internet report 2015. Virginia, United States: Internet society; 2016.

  • 3.

    Moeedfar S, Habbibpour Getabi K, Ganjee A. Study of Internet addiction between adolescent and young 15-25 years in Tehran University. Global Media J Tehran Univ. 2007;2(4):55-79.

  • 4.

    Griffiths M. Does internet and computer addiction exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2000;3(2):211-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493100316067.

  • 5.

    Young KS. Internet addiction, The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1(3):237-44. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237.

  • 6.

    Young KS. Caught in the net, How to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New Jersey, United States: John Wiley and Sons; 1998.

  • 7.

    Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997;27(1):191-7. [PubMed ID: 9122299].

  • 8.

    Saraji JH, Sheikhi Fini AA. Examine the relationship between internet addiction with academic achievement and mental health of high school students in Bandar Abbas. S J Educ Psychol Couns. 2017;4(1).

  • 9.

    Shayegh S, Azad H, Bahrami H. On the relationship between internet addiction and personality traits in adolescents in Tehran, (in Persian). J Fundam Ment Health. 2009;11(2):149-58.

  • 10.

    Ko CH, Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CS, Chen CC. The association between Internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: a review of the literature. Eur Psychiatry. 2012;27(1):1-8. [PubMed ID: 22153731]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.011.

  • 11.

    Jafary NM, Alipour NK, Mirizadeh M, Ahmari TH, Noroozinejad G, Sadeghi YT. The Survey of correlation between internet addiction and general health status among the students of Qom University of medical sciences in 2010-2011. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2012;6(3):86-90.

  • 12.

    Kawabe K, Horiuchi F, Ochi M, Oka Y, Ueno S. Internet addiction: Prevalence and relation with mental states in adolescents. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;70(9):405-12. [PubMed ID: 27178110]. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12402.

  • 13.

    Alhajjar BI. Internet addiction and psychological morbidity among nursing students in Gaza Palestine. Am J Appl Psychol. 2014;3(4):99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20140304.13.

  • 14.

    Gholamian B, Shahnazi H, Hassanzadeh A. The prevalence of internet addiction and its association with depression, anxiety, and stress, among high school students. Int J Pediatr. 2017;5(4). https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2017.22516.1883.

  • 15.

    Lashgarara B, Taghavi Shahri M, Maheri AB, Sadeghi R. Internet addiction and general health of dormitory students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2010. J Sch Public Health Inst Public Health Res. 2012;10(1):67-76.

  • 16.

    Nazifi M, Mokarami H, Akbaritabar A, Faraji Kujerdi M, Tabrizi R, Rahi A. Reliability, validity and factor structure of the persian translation of general health questionnaire, (GHQ-28) in hospitals of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2014;3(4).

  • 17.

    Alavi SS, Alaghemandan H, Maracy MR, Jannatifard F, Eslami M, Ferdosi M. Impact of addiction to internet on a number of psychiatric symptoms in students of isfahan universities, iran, 2010. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(2):122-7. [PubMed ID: 22347609].

  • 18.

    Hosseini Beheshtiyan S. Comparison of internet addiction between girl and boy student of Universities of Tehran. Women stud. 2011;2(4):23-42.

  • 19.

    Bakhshayesh A. Factors related to Internet addiction among female students living in the dormitory of the University of Yazd. J Women Cult Arts. 2014;6(1):61-9.

  • 20.

    Fayazbakhsh A, Khajeh KR, Soleymani NM, Rahimi F, Jahangiri L, Heydari S. The internet using and health, students knowledge, attitude and lifestyle related to the internet [In Persian]. Mirror Heritage. 2011;14(2):96-105.

  • 21.

    Nastizai N. The relationship between general health and internet addiction. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2009;11(1).

  • 22.

    Jahanian R, Seifury Z. The impact of internet addiction on students mental health in technical and vocational colleges in Alborz province. Middle East J Sci Res. 2013;14(11):447.