Logo
homeHome
toggle_offCompany ProfilegroupsBoards & Staffsworkspace_premiumMemberships & PartnersschoolAcademy of Journalismperson_addCareerslinkBlog(EN)emailContact Us
list_altOur JournalslightbulbInstruction for AuthorsbookmarkBrieflands PolicieshandshakePublish My Researchplay_circleJournal Management Systemcredit_cardArticle Processing Chargeszoom_inOpen Peer ReviewimagePublishing Services
menu_bookPublish My Book

Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research

homeHome
play_arrowCurrent IssuelistAll Issuesformat_indent_increaseIn Presscheck_circleAccepted ManuscriptssearchSearch
settingsInstructions
infoJournal InformationgroupsEditors and BoardsshareIndexing and Listing Sourcesshow_chartJournal Metricszoom_inOpen Peer Review (OPR)balancePublication Ethics and Malpractice Statementassignment_indReviewer and AE Registration FormchatSupportphoneContact Us
Authors GuideSubmit Manuscript

Image Credit:

Outlines

https://doi.org/10.5812/amh.80148

Synergistic Effect and Antibacterial Activities of Extracts of Salvia and Rosemary Officinalis Against Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Urinary Tract Infection

Author(s):
Forouzandeh AmirianForouzandeh Amirian1, Nadia Kazemi PourNadia Kazemi Pour1, Sayed Mohammad Reza KhoshrooSayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo1, Ahmadreza SayadiAhmadreza Sayadi2, Afsaneh KarmostajiAfsaneh KarmostajiAfsaneh Karmostaji ORCID3, Seyed Mohsen MousaviSeyed Mohsen Mousavi4, 5,*
1Department of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Kerman Branch, Kerman, Iran
2Department.of Psychiatric Nursing and Mental Health and Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
3Infectious and Tropical Disease Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
4Immunology of Infectious Diseases Research Center , Research Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
5Department.of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Paramedical, Rafsanjan University Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research:Vol. 15, issue 4; e80148
Published online:Dec 08, 2017
Article type:Research Article
Received:Oct 03, 2017
Accepted:Dec 01, 2017
How to Cite:Amirian F, Kazemi Pour N, Khoshroo SMR, Sayadi A, Karmostaji A, et al. Synergistic Effect and Antibacterial Activities of Extracts of Salvia and Rosemary Officinalis Against Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Urinary Tract Infection. Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2017;15(4):e80148. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/amh.80148

Abstract

Background:

Escherichia coli (E. coli) lives naturally in the human gut; however, emerging increase in bacterial resistance to antibiotics in some strains leads to chronic infection. Thus, more studies have recently focused on the characterization of potential plant natural antimicrobial agents, with fewer side effects. In the present study, antibacterial effects of salvia (teucrium polium) and rosemary officinalis extract have been evaluated against clinical isolated E. coli from urinary samples.

Methods:

In parallel with using Trimethoprim, Ceftriaxone, Cefixime, Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamicin, Ceftazidime, and Meropenem against E. coli, salvia and rosemary plant extracts have also been used separately and in association with the antibiotics to detect the sensitivities of the bacteria to the components.

Results:

Salvia and rosemary had synergistic effects on ceftazidime against E. coli. The components decreased sensitivities of E. coli to some of the antibiotics.

Conclusions:

Based on the results, salvia and rosemary are able to increase anti-E. coli effects of ceftazidime and can be considered as future supplementary components against the bacteria.

Keywords
Salvia Officinalis
Rosemary Officinalis
Antibiotics
Synergistic Effect
Escherichia coli

1. Background

Escherichia coli (E. coli), a saprophyte human gut microorganism, can lead to serious infections with resistance to antimicrobial therapies (1). One of the most common infections of this microorganism is urinary tract infection (UTI) (2). Despite the existence of potent antibiotic agents and due to the emerging of multidrug-resistant strains, investigators are focused on the development of new drugs strategies. Natural products often serve as molecules whose activities can be enhanced by manipulation through combinations with chemicals and by synthetic chemistry (3). Plants, as a rich source of secondary metabolites such as tannins, terpenoids, alkaloids, and polyphenols, are generally superior in their antimicrobial activities (3). Furthermore, using medicinal herbs can also lead to prevention of the chemical drug toxicity.
Salvia, commonly called “Kalpoureh” in Iran (4), is a durable, wild-growing, flowering grass plant that can grow to 10 - 30 cm (5). This plant has a callous white exterior and abounds in south-western Asia, Europe, and North Africa (6). The extract of Salvia consists of diterpenoids, 5 - 7- glycoside, thymols, carvacrol, and volatile essences that are found in its aerial parts and has antibacterial activity (7). Due to the synergistic effects of phenolic compounds such as flavonoids, the use of combinations of various Salvia species in traditional antimicrobial therapy is reported in various studies (8).
Rosemary is also another herbal drug that belongs to the Lamiaceae family. There is some evidence from the medical literature that this plant has effective antibacterial components (9).
The main aim of this study was to investigate antimicrobial effects and the synergistic effects of salvia and rosemary with 8 antibiotics against clinical E. coli isolated from urinary samples.

2. Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Specimens of salvia and rosemary officinalis species were collected from the agricultural and natural research center, Kerman, Iran, between April and August 2015.

2.2. Preparation of Plant Extracts

A total of 100 grams of the leaf and flower of the plants have been dried and the final weight of 50 g was powdered and macerated with a mixture of 480 mL methanol and 120 mL sterile distilled water for 5 days at room temperature in darkness. After evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure, the respective methanol extracts were collected. The resultant product was concentrated by vacuum distillation. All the extracts were kept in tightly closed dark stoppered bottles under refrigeration (4°C) until used for antimicrobial testing (10).

2.3. E. coli Isolation from Clinical Urinary Samples

For three months, from May until July 2016, 680 samples were collected from patients who referred to Aliebn-Abitaleb hospital in Rafsanjan. Accordingly, 60 E. coli isolates were obtained and identified by biochemical tests using indole, methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, citrate (IMVIC), and triple sugar iron agar (TSI) and sulfide-indole-motility (SIM) mediums, as especially mediums, (Biolife Company, Germany). Beta-glucuronidase enzymes test, which is an indicator feature for differentiation from other bacteria, were also used to confirm the bacterium (11).

2.4. Disc Diffusion Test

Qualitative antibacterial activities of the salvia and rosemary extracts as well as Trimethoprim, Ceftriaxone, Cefixime, Cefotaxime, Ciprofloxacin, Gentamicin, Ceftazidime, and Meropenem was evaluated using the Disk diffusion test (Padtan Teb Company, Iran) (12). Accordingly, the data of the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the E. coli isolates to commonly-used antibiotics in urinary tract infections were collected, alone and in combination with salvia and rosemary extracts. The concentration of the antibiotics were as follow: Trimethoprim (5 µg/mL), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg/mL), Ceftazidime (30 µg/mL), Ceftriaxone (30 µg/mL), Cefotaxime (30 µg/mL), Meropenem (10 µg/mL), Gentamicin (10 µg/mL), and Cefixime (5 µg/mL) (Padtan Teb Company, Iran) (13). To determinate the suitable concentration of the salvia and rosemary, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were performed and accordingly, each antibiotic disk was mixed with 1 mL of 32 µg/mL of salvia and 60 µg/mL Rosemary extracts. Both pure antibiotics, salvia and rosemary soaked discs, were incubated in the refrigerator up to 2 hours to stabilize (13). Accordingly, the discs were included 1, salvia; 2, rosemary; 3, salvia plus antibiotics; and 4, rosemary plus antibiotics impregnated disks. Additionally, the MIC was calculated for each group.
Approximately, 108 bacteria strains were cultured as 0.5 McFarland’s concentration using a sterile swab, and then the antibiotic discs impregnated with Salvia and Rosemary’s officinalis extractions with forceps sterile and then was transferred to the plate containing Muller Hinton Agar and standard inoculums of bacteria. Inhibition zone was measured after 18 hours based on the CLSI guidelines for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (14). Accordingly, data were presented as percent of sensitive and resistance E. coli to the antibiotics. However, Salvia and Rosemary synergistic effects may be at sensitive regions, hence, inhibition zones are also reported in the results section to show the synergistic effects.

2.5. Serial Dilution Assay

The MIC of the extracts was determined using broth microdilution techniques as described by the national committee for clinical laboratory standards in microtiters of 96 wells. Then, MIC values were determined in Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB), which is prepared from Biolife Company, Germany, by incubation overnight at 37°C for 24 hours (15). Extracted stock solutions were two-folds diluted from 0.5 to 1024 micro gr/mL (final volume = 80 µL) and a final Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) concentration ≤ 1%. Then, 100 µL of MHB were added onto microplate wells. Finally, 20 µL of 106 colony forming units (CFU/mL) (according to McFarland turbidity standards) of standardized bacterial suspensions were inoculated onto microplate wells and the test was performed in a volume of 200 µL. Plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. The same tests were performed simultaneously for growth (MHB + bacteria) and sterility controls (MHB + extract). The MIC was calculated as the highest dilution showing complete inhibition zone of tested strain. Only extracts that showed antimicrobial activities from agar-well diffusion method were tested for MIC.

2.6. Data Analyze and Statistical Methods

The data were analyzed using SPSS18 software and, Chi-square, Fisher, ty Anova statistical tests. The level of significance was considered P < 0.0 5 in all tests.

3. Results

The MIC of salvia and rosemary extract on 60 E. coli clinical isolates were 32 and 64 µg/mL, respectively. Thus, the concentrations were used for evaluation of the synergistic effects of salvia and rosemary on the antibiotics against all E. coli isolates. MIC of the antibiotics was also calculated and Figure 1 shows a sample.
MIC test of CF. The Figure shows that <i>E. coli</i> from a patient (Number 22) in the CF concentration of 256 was sensitive.
Figure 1.

MIC test of CF. The Figure shows that E. coli from a patient (Number 22) in the CF concentration of 256 was sensitive.

The results revealed that E. coli sensitivities to Trimethoprim, Ciprofloxacin, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Meropenem, Gentamicin, Cefixime, Salvia, and Rosemary were 36.7%, 80.0%, 46.7%, 63.3%, 63.3%, 100.0%, 83.3%, 83.3%, 60.0%, and 58.3%, respectively. Experimental studies also demonstrated that using Salvia extract with Trimethoprim, Ciprofloxacin, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Meropenem, Gentamicin, and Cefixime altered E. coli sensitivities to 56.7%, 86.7%, 93.3%, 73.0%, 70.0%, 100.0%, 86.7%, and 76.7%, respectively. Additionally, Rosemary also altered E. coli sensitivities to Trimethoprim (60.0%), Ciprofloxacin (86.7%), Ceftazidime (93.3%), Ceftriaxone (76.7%), Cefotaxime (63.3%), Meropenem (100.0%), Gentamicin (86.4%), and Cefixime (76.3%). Table 1 shows the clinical isolates of E. coli sensitivities to the antibiotics either alone or in combination with salvia and rosemary.
Table 1.The Effects of Salvia and Rosemary on the Sensitivities and Resistances of E. Coli to the Antibioticsa,b
SXT and RMSXT and SV
SensitiveResistanceP ValueSensitiveResistanceP Value
SXT0.604< 0.001
Sensitive23 (71.9)11 (64.7)33 (100)3 (15.8)
Resistance9 (28.1)6 (35.3)0 (0)16 (84.2)
SXT and RM-0.682
Sensitive--22 (68.8)12 (63.2)
Resistance--10 (31.3)7 (36.8)
CRO and RMCRO and SV
SensitiveResistanceP valueSensitiveResistanceP value
CRO< 0.001< 0.001
Sensitive36 (97.3)9 (60)39 (97.5)7 (53.8)
Resistance1 (6)6 (40)1 (2.5)6 (46.2)
CRO and RM-0.262
Sensitive--31 (70.5)7 (53.8)
Resistance--13 (29.5)6 (46.2)
CFM and RMCFM and SV
SensitiveResistanceP valueSensitiveResistanceP value
CFM0.0070.086
Sensitive36 (78.3)2 (28.6)32 (80)6 (54)
Resistance10 (21.7)5 (71.4)8 (20)5 (45.5)
CFM and RM-< 0.001
Sensitive--42 (100)6 (42.9)
Resistance--0 (0)8 (57.1)
CTX and RMCTX and SV
SensitiveResistanceP valueSensitiveResistanceP value
CTX0.7901.0
Sensitive38 (79.2)6 (75.7)46 (100)0 (0)
Resistance10 (20.8)2 (25 )0 (0)14 (100)
CTX and RM-0.790
Sensitive--38 (86.4)10 (83.3)
Resistance--6 (13.6)2 (16.7)
CP and RMCP and SV
SensitiveResistanceP valueSensitiveResistanceP value
CP0.0941.0
Sensitive46 (95.8)6 (75)52 (100)0 (0)
Resistance2 (4.2)2 (25)0 (0)4 (100)
CP and RM-0.034
Sensitive--46 (88.5)2 (50)
Resistance--6 (11.5)2 (50)
GM and RMGM and SV
SensitiveResistanceP valueSensitiveResistanceP value
GM
Sensitive26 (92.9)4 (40)0.00252 (100)0 (0)1.0
Resistance2 (7.1)6 (60)0 (0)8 (100)
GM and RM-1.0
Sensitive--26 (86.7)2 (25)
Resistance--4 (13.3)6 (75)
CAZ and RMCAZ and SV
SensitiveResistanceP valueSensitiveResistanceP value
CAZ
Sensitive56 (93.3)56 (93.3)1.056 (100)0 (0)1.0
Resistance4 (6.7)4 (6.7)0 (0)4 (100)
CAZ and RM-1.0
Sensitive--56 (100)4 (100)
Resistance--0 (0)0 (0)

aValues are expressed as No. (%).

bThe Table shows that Rosemary (RM) converts sensitivities of E. coli to Cefixime (CFM) and Gentamicin (GM) and Salvia (SV) significantly increased resistance of E.coli to Trimethoprim (SXT) and Ceftriaxone (CRO). Salvia and Rosemary had not affect sensitivities of E. coli to Cefotaxime (CTX), Ciprofloxacin (CP) and Ceftazidime (CAZ).

The results revealed that the inhibition zone in Ceftazidime, Ceftazidime plus rosemary, and Ceftazidime plus salvia were, 17.50 ± 0.43, 24.11 ± 0.79, and 24.13 ± 0.81, respectively (Figure 2). Data analysis showed that the differences between Ceftazidime and Ceftazidime plus rosemary (P < 0.001) and also between Ceftazidime and Ceftazidime plus salvia (P < 0.001) were significant. Data analysis also revealed that the differences regarding zone of inhibition in Ceftriaxone versus Ceftriaxone plus rosemary (P = 0.005) was significant and Ceftriaxone plus rosemary increased the inhibition zone.
Synergistic effects of Salvia and Rosemary on the Ceftazidime against <i>E. coli</i>. The figure shows that Rosemary has significant synergistic effect on the Ceftazidime against <i>E. coli.</i>
Figure 2.

Synergistic effects of Salvia and Rosemary on the Ceftazidime against E. coli. The figure shows that Rosemary has significant synergistic effect on the Ceftazidime against E. coli.

However, data analysis revealed that other competitions were not significant. Accordingly, the results revealed that the inhibition zone in salvia was 5.53 ± 0.71 and in rosemary was 5.48 ± 0.91 (P = 1.0). The results also showed that inhibition zone in Trimethoprim, Trimethoprim plus rosemary, and Trimethoprim plus salvia were, 14.13 ± 0.78, 17.65 ± 1.01, and 16.06 ± 1.30, respectively. Data analysis showed that there were no significant differences between trimethoprim and trimethoprim plus Rosemary (P = 0.429) and also between Trimethoprim and Trimethoprim plus Salvia (P = 0.997).
Data showed that there were no significant differences in ceftriaxone versus ceftriaxone plus salvia (P = 0.307), Cefixime versus Cefixime plus rosemary (P = 1.00), Cefixime versus Cefixime plus salvia (P = 0.999), Cefotaxime versus Cefotaxime plus rosemary (P = 0.985), Cefotaxime versus Cefotaxime plus salvia (P = 0.968), Ciprofloxacin versus Ciprofloxacin plus rosemary (P = 1.0), Ciprofloxacin versus Ciprofloxacin plus salvia (P = 1.0), Gentamicin versus Gentamicin plus rosemary (P = 0.983) and also Gentamicin versus Gentamicin plus salvia (P = 0.983).

4. Discussion

Investigation of the antibacterial properties of indigenous medicinal plants could have a benefit for the development of new drugs to control the growth of an important bacterial pathogen. Ethanolic Salvia extract has been shown to have high antibacterial activity against tetracycline-resistant Brucella melitensis (16) E. coli (17) and Salmonella typhi (18), E. coliO157 (19), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus, as well as Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger (20). In the present study, the synergistic antibacterial activities of salvia and rosemary with some common antibiotics against E. coli isolated from clinical samples (UTI) have been explored. The results demonstrated that the sensitivities of E. coli to Ceftazidime significantly increased after using rosemary (Table 1), but not Salvia. In addition, accordingly, rosemary increased the inhibition zone of the antibiotic significantly. Additionally, either rosemary or salvia also significantly had synergistic effects on the inhibition zone of the Ceftriaxone. It has been reported that either Ceftazidime or Ceftriaxone has antibacterial effects by inhibition of cell wall synthesis (21, 22). Accordingly, Ceftazidime via replacement with peptidoglycan components and Ceftriaxone via binding to the transpeptidases (transaminases), which are penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis (21, 22). Based on the results, it appears that rosemary through elevation of Ceftazidime and Ceftriaxone mechanisms increased their effects on E. coli growth. Accordingly, it may be hypothesized that rosemary increased replacement of Ceftazidime in the E. coli cell wall. The synergistic effects of rosemary on the Ceftriaxone may be due to increased antibiotic binding to PBPS. However, based on the fact that rosemary had no synergistic effects on the Cefotaxime and Cefixime, which have similar mechanisms to inhibition of cell wall generation via binding to the PBPs (23, 24), it may be hypothesized that synergistic effects of rosemary on the Ceftriaxone may be related to the chemical components of Ceftriaxone, which needs to be explored by further investigation. Meanwhile, the sensitivity of E. coli to Ceftriaxone was decreases after using Ceftriaxone with rosemary and 9 cases were resistant to Ceftriaxone plus rosemary, while they were sensitive to Ceftriaxone alone. Interestingly, results showed that salvia had synergistic effects on the Ceftazidime only. Based on the main mechanisms used by Ceftazidime against E. coli, inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis, it appears that salvia has similar effects on the antibiotic like rosemary. However, salvia was unable to increase the inhibition zone on other antibiotics, even Ceftriaxone. Based on the fact that both salvia and rosemary had no synergistic effects on the Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin, and Trimethoprim, which affects E. coli via inhibition of translation, DNA replication, and folic acid synthesis, respectively (25-27), it may be hypothesized that either salvia or rosemary do not have any synergistic effects on the antibiotics.
The results also demonstrated that rosemary increased E. coli resistance to Cefixime and Gentamicin in 2 and 4 cases, respectively. Salvia induces E. coli resistance to Trimethoprim in 3 cases and Ceftriaxone in 7 cases (Table 1). Based on the fact that salvia and rosemary increased inhibition zone in Ceftazidime only, and had no synergistic effects on other antibiotics (except Rosemary on Ceftriaxone), and based on the negative roles played by salvia and rosemary on some antibiotics and decreased their sensitivities, it seems, that using salvia and rosemary can be considered as a supplementary drug in association with Ceftazidime only and their use in association with other antibiotics needs to be avoided. In parallel with our results, Nascimento et al., also reported that salvia extracts did not present any antimicrobial activities against some antibiotic-resistant bacteria including E. coli (28). In contrast with our results, Kamatou et al., reported the synergistic actions of salvia against the gram-positive bacteria (29). Interestingly, while various results of antagonism, synergism, and/or additive actions were observed on the gram-negative bacteria (29). Based on previous results and our results, it seems that salvia may increase sensitivities of gram-positive to the antibiotics, in spite of gram-negative bacteria, which needs to be evaluated with further investigations.
Due to the fact that all E. coli isolates were sensitivities to either Meropenem alone or in combination with salvia and rosemary, the synergistic effects of the antibiotic have not been evaluated.

4.1. Conclusion

Finally, based on the results, salvia and rosemary have synergistic effects with Ceftazidime against E. coli. Due to the effects of the antibiotic on the E. coli cell wall, it may be concluded that salvia and rosemary increased the main mechanisms used by the antibiotic on the bacteria cell walls and, hence, can be considered as a future therapy against resistant E. coli isolates in UTI.

References

  • 1.
    Mendoza-Palomar N, Balasch-Carulla M, Gonzalez-Di Lauro S, Cespedes MC, Andreu A, Frick MA, et al. Escherichia coli early-onset sepsis: trends over two decades. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(9):1227-34. [PubMed ID: 28770413]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2975-z.
  • 2.
    Mellata M, Johnson JR, Curtiss R 3rd. Escherichia coli isolates from commercial chicken meat and eggs cause sepsis, meningitis and urinary tract infection in rodent models of human infections. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65(1):103-13. [PubMed ID: 28703468]. https://doi.org/10.1111/zph.12376.
  • 3.
    Bouzada MLM, Fabri RL, Nogueira M, Konno TUP, Duarte GG, Scio E. Antibacterial, cytotoxic and phytochemical screening of some traditional medicinal plants in Brazil. Pharm Biol. 2009;47(1):44-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880200802411771.
  • 4.
    Rosenbaum CD, Carreiro SP, Babu KM. Here today, gone tomorrow...and back again? A review of herbal marijuana alternatives (K2, Spice), synthetic cathinones (bath salts), kratom, Salvia divinorum, methoxetamine, and piperazines. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8(1):15-32. [PubMed ID: 22271566]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3550220]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-011-0202-2.
  • 5.
    Nkomo MM, Katerere DD, Vismer HH, Cruz TT, Balayssac SS, Malet-Martino MM, et al. Fusarium inhibition by wild populations of the medicinal plant Salvia africana-lutea L. linked to metabolomic profiling. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:99. [PubMed ID: 24621275]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4101822]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-99.
  • 6.
    Malencic D, Gasic O, Popovic M, Boza P. Screening for antioxidant properties of Salvia reflexa hornem. Phytother Res. 2000;14(7):546-8. [PubMed ID: 11054848].
  • 7.
    Bisio A, De Mieri M, Milella L, Schito AM, Parricchi A, Russo D, et al. Antibacterial and Hypoglycemic Diterpenoids from Salvia chamaedryoides. J Nat Prod. 2017;80(2):503-14. [PubMed ID: 28186413]. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b01053.
  • 8.
    Zhang S, Liu Y, Shen S, Liang Z, Yang D. [Effects of elicitors on accumulation of phenolic acids and tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root]. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2011;36(10):1269-74. Chinese. [PubMed ID: 21837963].
  • 9.
    Loussouarn M, Krieger-Liszkay A, Svilar L, Bily A, Birtic S, Havaux M. Carnosic Acid and Carnosol, Two Major Antioxidants of Rosemary, Act through Different Mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 2017;175(3):1381-94. [PubMed ID: 28916593]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5664485]. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01183.
  • 10.
    Lopez-Bote CJ, Gray JI, Gomaa EA, Flegal CJ. Effect of dietary administration of oil extracts from rosemary and sage on lipid oxidation in broiler meat. Br Poult Sci. 1998;39(2):235-40. [PubMed ID: 9649877]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669889187.
  • 11.
    Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14(4):933-51. table of contents. [PubMed ID: 11585791]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC89009]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.4.933-951.2001.
  • 12.
    Mills-Robertson FC, Tay SC, Duker-Eshun G, Walana W, Badu K. In vitro antimicrobial activity of ethanolic fractions of Cryptolepis sanguinolenta. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2012;11:16. [PubMed ID: 22709723]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3473295]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-11-16.
  • 13.
    Drew WL, Barry AL, O'Toole R, Sherris JC. Reliability of the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for detecting methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Microbiol. 1972;24(2):240-7. [PubMed ID: 5071651]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC380588].
  • 14.
    Cekovska Z, Petrovska M, Jankoska G, Panovski N, Kaftandzieva A. Isolation, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of brucella blood culture isolates. Prilozi. 2010;31(1):117-32. [PubMed ID: 20703187].
  • 15.
    Thamlikitkul V, Lorchirachoonkul N, Tiengrim S. In vitro and in vivo activity of tebipenem against ESBL-producing E. coli. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014;97(12):1259-68. [PubMed ID: 25764632].
  • 16.
    Motamedi H, Darabpour E, Gholipour M, Seyyed Nejad SM. In vitro assay for the anti-Brucella activity of medicinal plants against tetracycline-resistant Brucella melitensis. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010;11(7):506-11. [PubMed ID: 20593515]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2897020]. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0900365.
  • 17.
    Sharifi-Rad J, Mnayer D, Roointan A, Shahri F, Ayatollahi SA, Sharifi-Rad M, et al. Antibacterial activities of essential oils from Iranian medicinal plants on extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2016;62(9):75-82. [PubMed ID: 27650980].
  • 18.
    Shirazi MH, Ranjbar R, Eshraghi S, Amin G, Nouri MS, Bazzaz N. Inhibitory effects of Sage extract on the growth of enteric bacteria. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11(3):487-9. [PubMed ID: 18817180].
  • 19.
    Ying G, Zhang S, Hu Y, Yang M, Chen P, Wu X, et al. Antibacterial evaluation of Salvia miltiorrhizae on Escherichia coli by microcalorimetry coupled with chemometrics. AMB Express. 2017;7(1):65. [PubMed ID: 28303551]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5355400]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0359-4.
  • 20.
    Yousefzadi M, Sonboli A, Ebrahimi SN, Hashemi SH. Antimicrobial activity of essential oil and major constituents of Salvia chloroleuca. Z Naturforsch C. 2008;63(5-6):337-40. [PubMed ID: 18669017].
  • 21.
    Pimchan T, Maensiri D, Eumkeb G. Synergy and mechanism of action of alpha-mangostin and ceftazidime against ceftazidime-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017;65(4):285-91. [PubMed ID: 28799218]. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12789.
  • 22.
    Kadry AA. Lack of efflux mechanism in a clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa highly resistant to beta-lactams and imipenem. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(4):529-33. [PubMed ID: 14533486].
  • 23.
    Molina-Quiroz RC, Loyola DE, Munoz-Villagran CM, Quatrini R, Vasquez CC, Perez-Donoso JM. DNA, cell wall and general oxidative damage underlie the tellurite/cefotaxime synergistic effect in Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2013;8(11). e79499. [PubMed ID: 24260236]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3832599]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079499.
  • 24.
    Shigi Y, Matsumoto Y, Kaizu M, Fujishita Y, Kojo H. Mechanism of action of the new orally active cephalosporin FK027. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1984;37(7):790-6. [PubMed ID: 6381449].
  • 25.
    Denisuik AJ, Karlowsky JA, Denisuik T, Nichols WW, Keating TA, Adam HJ, et al. In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against 338 molecularly characterized gentamicin-nonsusceptible Gram-negative clinical isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(6):3623-6. [PubMed ID: 25824208]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4432173]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00364-15.
  • 26.
    Li JR, Wang YX, Wang X, Yuan B, Fu ML. Intercalation and adsorption of ciprofloxacin by layered chalcogenides and kinetics study. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2015;453:69-78. [PubMed ID: 25965434]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.03.067.
  • 27.
    Neela V, Rankouhi SZ, van Belkum A, Goering RV, Awang R. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Malaysia: molecular epidemiology and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16(8):e603-7. [PubMed ID: 22698885]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2012.04.004.
  • 28.
    Nascimento GGF, Locatelli J, Freitas PC, Silva GL. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Braz J Microbiol. 2000;31(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822000000400003.
  • 29.
    Kamatou GPP, Viljoen AM, van Vuuren SF, van Zyl RL. In vitro evidence of antimicrobial synergy between Salvia chamelaeagnea and Leonotis leonurus. South Afr J Bot. 2006;72(4):634-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2006.03.011.
Import into EndNoteImport into BibTex
Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Comments
Number of Comments:0
Cited by
Metrics
Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles

Related Article in PubMed

Related Article in Google Scholar

Create Citation Alert via Google Reader