1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Study Population
3.2. Sampling of Fasciola spp. and Morphological Analysis of the Spermatogenic Status
| Fasciola spp. Fluke Population | Number of Flukes | DNA Types | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Province | District | Number of Infected Cattle | Total | Spermic | Aspermic | ITS1 | ND1 | CO1 |
| Khorasan Razawi | Ghochan and Mashhad | 10 | 20 | 20 | - | F.g | F.g | F.g |
| North Khorasan | Bojnurd | 8 | 16 | 16 | - | F.ha | F.h | F.h |
| F.g | F.g | F.g | ||||||
| North Khorasan | Maneh | 8 | 16 | 16 | - | F.ha | F.h | F.h |
| F.g | F.g | F.g | ||||||
| North Khorasan | Shirvan | 4 | 12 | 12 | - | F.g | F.g | F.g |
| Sistan and Baluchistan | Zahedan | 16 | 48 | 48 | - | F.g | F.g | F.g |
| Sistan and Baluchistan | Zahedan (2) | 11 | 22 | 22 | - | F.g | F.g | F.g |
| Sistan and Baluchistan | Saravan | 3 | 15 | 12 | 3 | F.g | F.g | F.g |
Abbreviations: F.g, F. gigantica; F.h, F. hepatica.
aCoexistence of F. hepatica and F. gigantica in most cattle.
3.3. DNA Extraction and Amplification
3.4. PCR-RFLP Method
3.5. Genetic Diversity Indices, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Sequences
4. Results
4.1. Microscopic Observation
| Species | Population | Diversity Indices | Neutrality Indices | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Hn | S | Hd ± SD | π | Tajima’s D | Fu’s Fs Statistic | ||
| F. hepatica | East of Iran | 60 | 9 | 17 | 1 ± 0.052 | 0.01668 | -1.26770a | -3.138 |
| F. hepatica | Egypt | 19 | 14 | NC | 0.978 ± 0.027 | 0.08217 | -2.50218 | 1.298 |
| F. hepatica | China | 6 | 6 | NC | 1 ± 0.096 | 0.00586 | 0.12841 | -3.178 |
| F. gigantica | East of Iran | 90 | 4 | 22 | 0.867 ± 0.129 | 0.02689 | 0.74707 | 3.366 |
| F. gigantica | Eastern Indiaa | 91 | 32 | NC | 0.751 ± 0.050 | 0.00242 | NC | NC |
| F. gigantica | Nepala | 20 | 10 | NC | 0.753 ± 0.101 | 0.00366 | NC | NC |
| F. gigantica | Bangladeshb | 20 | 15 | NC | 0.832 ± 0.075 | 0.00362 | NC | NC |
Abbreviations: Hd, haplotype diversity; Hn, number of haplotypes; NC, not calculated; Nd, nucleotide diversity; S, number of variable sites.
aStatistical significance: not significant, P > 0.1.
bCited from Hayashi et al. (9).
4.2. Molecular Findings
4.3. Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity
| Population | Population | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East of Iran | Egypt | Bangladesh | Zambia | Vietnam | |
| East of Iran | - | ||||
| Egypt | 0.98798 | - | |||
| Bangladesh | 0.99075 | 0.99599 | - | ||
| Zambia | 0.99133 | 0.98401 | 0.53823 | - | |
| Vietnam | 0.99133 | 0.99704 | 0.68867 | 0.54111 | - |
aAll values are statistically significant (P > 0.05).
aAll values are statistically insignificant (P > 0.05).
bAsia: China, Thailand, Japan.
cEurope: Italy, Poland.


