4.1. Participants
In this cross-control study, a total of 134 participants, including 67 patients with colorectal cancers and 67 healthy individuals referred to the general hospitals of Lorestan province, Iran were studied to determine the prevalence of B. hominis as well as the associated risk factors among them. The mean age of the participants in the case and control groups was 41.3 ± 3.5 and 44.6 ± 2.5 years, respectively. Most participants were male in the case (54, 80.6%) and control (51, 76.1%) groups. Moreover, 53 (79.1%) and 57 (87.1%) participants in the case and control groups lived in urban areas, respectively and the rest lived in rural parts.
Among the participants in the case and control groups, 24 (35.8%) and 32 (47.8%) participants had diploma or higher, respectively, whereas the remaining were in the lower than diploma group. Also, 56 (83.6%) and 57 (87.1%) participants in the case and control groups washed their hands before eating, respectively, while the rest of the participants did not perform it. Furthermore, 17 (25.4%) and 18 (26.9%) participants in the case and control groups consumed unwashed fruit and vegetables, respectively; however, the remaining did not consume unwashed fruit and vegetables. Regarding agriculture activity, 16 (23.9%) and 12 (17.9%) participants in the case and control groups had agriculture activities, respectively, whereas other participants did not have agriculture activity (
Table 1).
| Variables | Control | Case |
|---|
| No. of Positive (%) | No. (%) | No. of Positive (%) | No. (%) |
|---|
| Gender | | | | |
| Female | 0 (0) | 16 (23.9) | 4 (30.8) | 13 (19.4) |
| Male | 6 (11.8) | 51 (76.1) | 12 (22.2) | 54 (80.6) |
| Age group, y | | | | |
| < 30 | 1 (7.7) | 13 (19.4) | 5 (41.7) | 12 (17.9) |
| > 30 | 5 (9.3) | 54 (80.6) | 11 (20) | 55 (82.1) |
| Residence | | | | |
| Rural | 4 (40) | 10 (14.9) | 6 (42.9) | 14 (20.9) |
| Urban | 2 (3.5) | 57 (85.1) | 10 (18.9) | 53 (79.1) |
| Education | | | | |
| < Diploma | 4 (11.4) | 35 (52.2) | 14 (32.6) | 43 (64.2) |
| > Diploma | 2 (6.3) | 32 (47.8) | 2 (8.3) | 24 (35.8) |
| Handwashing | | | | |
| Yes | 4 (7) | 57 (85.1) | 15 (26.8) | 56 (83.6) |
| No | 2 (20) | 10 (14.9) | 1 (9.1) | 11 (16.4) |
| Consumption of unwashed fruit and vegetables | | | | |
| Yes | 3 (16.7) | 18 (26.9) | 11 (64.7) | 17 (25.4) |
| No | 3 (6.1) | 49 (73.1) | 5 (10) | 50 (74.6) |
| Animal contact | | | | |
| Yes | 4 (33.3) | 12 (17.9) | 3 (30) | 10 (14.9) |
| No | 2 (3.6) | 55 (82.1) | 13 (22.8) | 57 (85.1) |
| Agriculture activity | | | | |
| Yes | 5 (41.7) | 12 (17.9) | 7 (43.8) | 16 (23.9) |
| No | 1 (1.8) | 55 (82.1) | 9 (17.6) | 51 (76.1) |
4.2. Prevalence of Blastocystis hominis Infection
Of 67 patients with colorectal cancers (case group), B. hominis was found in 16 (23.9%) patients, whereas of 67 healthy participants in the control group, B. hominis was found in 6 (9%) participants, indicating the significant difference (P < 0.001) in the prevalence of B. hominis among the participants in the case and control groups.
Considering gender, there was a significant correlation between gender and the prevalence of B. hominis (P = 0.017). The obtained findings revealed that there is a significant relationship between the positivity of the test and the gender of the female in the two groups; thus 4 (30.8%) and 0 (0%) female participants were found positive for B. hominis in the case and control groups, respectively. However, there was no significant relationship between the positivity of the test with male gender in both groups (P = 0.122).
There was a significant correlation between age and the prevalence of B. hominis (P = 0.011). In the study of age-related subgroups, there was no significant correlation in the prevalence of B. hominis in participants with age less than 30 years (P = 0.063) and age over 30 (P = 0.094) in the case and control groups.
In general, there was a significant relationship between residence and the prevalence of B. hominis (P = 0.017). The results showed a significant association between the prevalence of B. hominis and residence in urban areas (P = 0.01). In this regard, among participants who lived in urban areas, 10 (18.9%) and 2 (3.5%) participants were found positive for B. hominis in the case and control groups, respectively. However, there was no significant correlation between the prevalence of B. hominis and residence in rural regions in the case and control groups (P = 0.611).
Considering education, there was a significant association between education and the prevalence of B. hominis (P = 0.01). There was a significant correlation between the prevalence of B. hominis and the education with lower than diploma (P = 0.023). In this regard, 14 (32.6%) and 4 (11.4%) participants with lower than diploma were found positive for B. homonis in the case and control groups. However, there was no statistically significant association between the positivity of the test and the education level lower than diploma in the two groups (P = 0.21).
A significant relationship was observed between handwashing and the prevalence of B. hominis (P = 0.007). The results demonstrated that the prevalence B. hominis among the participants who did not wash their hands before eating was significantly higher (P = 0.005) than the participants who washed their hands before eating (P = 0.46).
The results indicated that a significant association was found between the prevalence of B. hominis and consumption of unwashed fruit and vegetables (P = 0.001). In this regard, 11 (64.7%) and 3 (16.7%) participants who consumed unwashed fruit and vegetables were found positive for B. homonis the in case and control group, respectively (P = 0.005). However, no significant association was observed in the prevalence B. hominis in participants who did not consume unwashed fruit and vegetables in both groups (P = 0.35).
Regarding agriculture activity, there was a significant correlation between agriculture activity and the prevalence of
B. hominis (P = 0.003). The obtained results showed that 9 (17.6%) and 1 (1.8%) participants who had agriculture activity (P = 0.006) were found positive for
B. homonis in the case and control groups, respectively. The statistical analysis also demonstrated that there was no significant correlation in the prevalence of
B. hominis in participants who had no agriculture activity in both groups (P = 0.35) (
Table 1).