Knowledge about mastitis prevalence, microbial differences, and the risk factors relating to the disease development can significantly improve the prevention and treatment guidelines. Previous studies have shown that mastitis varies among countries as well as farms and cows (
17). This meaningful variation in the prevalence of clinical and subclinical mastitis can be associated with ineffective mastitis control programs, environmental factors, and poor hygiene standards in the studied areas (
18,
19). The results of the present study revealed that the amounts of exotoxin A, T, and U genes in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa samples isolated from bovine mastitis in Tabriz City were 15%, 26.6%, and 21.6%, respectively. This study has been conducted for the first time in Iran on the frequency of important exotoxin genes in
P. aeruginosa isolated from bovine mastitis cases. Park et al reported that 82.7% isolates of
P. aeruginosa derived from raw milk samples from bovine mastitis had exotoxin U and/or exotoxin S genes containing the invasive (exoU–/ exoS+, 69.4%), cytotoxic (exoU+/exoS–, 8.3%) and cytotoxic/invasive strains (exoU+/ exoS+, 5.0%) (
20). Aghaei et al. reported that the rate of exotoxin A, T, and U genes in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa samples isolated from clinical samples of hospitalized patients in Qom City (located in the center of Iran) was 100%, 37.9%, and 26.4%, respectively (
21). In a study in Poland, it was revealed that the rate of exotoxin A genes in clinical
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains was 76.9% (
22). Shi et al. showed that the rate of exotoxin A and U genes in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa samples isolated from drinking water and environmental isolates was 92% and 9%, respectively (
23). Mahdavi et al. revealed that the prevalence of exotoxin T and U genes among
P. aeruginosa isolates from patients in Tehran hospitals were 76.32% and 67.27%, respectively (
24). Meaningful differences in the frequency of exotoxin A, T, and U genes in various studies might be associated with different sources of isolation in different areas, their methods of investigation and sensitivity, and also the number and types of samples. The results also show the difference in dispersion of exotoxin A, T, and U genes in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains; this difference is probably rooted in geographical diversities and also the ecological origin of the isolated strains (foodstuff, human, and different animals).