The sensitivity and specificity value of each of these risk factors was too low to be useful for daily clinical decisions in the treatment of an individual patient. Therefore, multi-marker prediction models have been proposed in order to improve the predictive value of clinical and genetic parameters. In 2016, Vos et al. (
42) constructed The Graves’ recurrent events after therapy (GREAT) score for clinical markers; the GREAT+ score was also developed for combining clinical and genetic markers in order to calculate the risk of recurrence prior to the start of ATD treatment. The data was derived from 178 patients with a first episode of GD who were treated with ATD (block and replacement regimen) for 1 year, and were followed for a further 2 years. The GREAT and GREAT+ scores were divided into classes according to baseline recurrence risk factors (i.e., age, serum fT4, serum TBII, goiter size, HLA polymorphism, PTPN22 C/T).
Table 1 shows the recurrence rates at the end of the follow-up in GREAT score classes I, II, and III which were 16.4%, 43.9%, and 68.4%, respectively. The recurrence rates at the end of follow-up in GREAT+ score class I, II, III, and IV were 4.3%, 20.6%, 49.3%, and 84.2%, respectively. The largest benefit of the GREAT+ score is in GREAT score class II. In 2017, Bartalena et al. (
41) developed a Clinical Severity score (CSS) to assess the overall disease severity by grading each component of the Merseburg triad (i.e., hyperthyroidism, goiter, and orbitopathy). The baseline CSS score was associated with a poor control of hyperthyroidism after 6 months of ATD treatment and a non statistically significant risk for hyperthyroidism at month 12. However, neither goiter size nor serum fT4 levels were per se associated with a risk of poor control (
41).
The predictive value of the GREAT score has since been validated by a study retrospectively analyzing the data of 741 patients with a first episode of Graves’ hyperthyroidism from four Swiss endocrine outpatient clinics (
74); in addition to a retrospective single-center study of 387 GD patients, who completed an 18 - 24 months ATD course and were followed for at least 2 years in Italy (
75). However, if more genetic markers, such as CTLA4 and CD40 were included, the predictive value would be enhanced.