In this study, SpO2 and HR changes were shown in premature babies who were not supported with oxygen and ventilation in delivery room at first minutes of life. Also SpO2 level and HR value differences in premature babies which were not included in NRP guidelines were emphasized with the help of percentiles.
There are several studies focusing on saturation levels in healthy term neonates by applying new generation pulse oximeters in delivery room (
10-
14). In literature, preductal SpO
2 levels in term babies were found higher than preterm babies as we also established in our study. Besides this data we showed that preterm babies’ SpO
2 levels had a more slow increase than reported in NRP for term babies. So, approaches (oxygen supplementation) in NRP should be evaluated with slightly different SpO
2 set levels (3% less than term babies in first 5 minutes of life) for preterm babies according to term ones, because unnecessary oxygen administration will cause oxidative stress that can last up to 4 weeks after birth (
15).
There are few reports of target SpO
2 levels with preterm babies in delivery room. Nuntnarumit et al stated that the median SpO
2 values (IQR) at 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 minutes were 77% (72 to 92), 84% (75 to 94), 88% (80 to 94), 90% (79 to 95) and 95% (85 to 97), respectively (
16). These results appear to be higher than our study findings. Our explanation for this situation is that it is because of the 60 seconds delay in attachment of probes due to basic steps of resuscitation. In our study SpO
2 levels had similar results but slightly more narrow range and lower values than those of Dawson et al. (
17). This situation may depend on determination of premature action as cesarean indication from obstetricians in our hospital, major part of cases were formed from babies born with cesarean section [83.3% vs 48%], and maternal oxygen administration with conventional approach during cesarean section. It might be expected that SpO
2 levels were lower in our study because more babies were born with cesarean section. Katheria et al concluded that premature infants who receive umbilical cord milking have higher SpO
2, therefore we could determine SpO
2 levels to be higher to some degree (
18). The target oxygen saturation levels were stated at 2015 world health organization (WHO) recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes as follows: 55% - 75% at 2nd minute, 65% - 80% at 3rd minute, 70% - 85% at 4th minute, 75% - 90% at 5th minute and 85% - 95% at 10th minute (
19). Target values of SpO
2 determined by WHO for premature babies have quite a wide range according to ours and Dawson et al’s study (
17). This situation may cause different applications to determine oxygen supplementation in practical approaches.
Although graphical presentation of percentiles of SpO
2 follow up levels of premature babies in delivery room are presented in literature, percentiles of SpO
2 levels could not be found. With this aspect, the objective of the current study is to provide reference values of percentiles of SpO
2 levels that pediatricians may use during resuscitation. In our study, we obtained similar graphical view to percentile charts of Dawson et al. (
17).
Considering all studies about follow-up SpO2 levels of premature babies, it is remarkable that fluctuation was noticed during first 5 to 7 minutes and then became more stable and rose slightly after 10 to 15 minutes.
At present, pulse oximetry is used routinely to monitor HR or titrate oxygen delivery in only 30% of United Kingdom delivery units (
20). However, van Vonderen JJ et al stated that ECG is the faster way to acquire HR after birth but ECG has disadvantages in premature babies like the risk of pulseless electrical activity being misinterpreted, difficulty ensuring its adhesion to the skin [blood, mucus, vernix, amniotic fluid], possible skin damage, insufficient space in premature babies, and delayed resuscitation (
21-
23). Therefore, specifying feasible alternative suggestions (like digital stethoscope) in a clear manner intended for developing countries will be useful (
24). For these reasons using pulse oximeters in SpO
2 and HR follow up of premature babies in delivery room will be suitable (in umbilical cord late clamping strategy, immediate clamping from the moment of birth with attachment of probe in a suitable way).
In our study premature infants had lower HR and it rose more slowly than in term infants according to previous studies especially in the first 5 to 7 minutes of life (
25). Compared to our study, Pichler et al found lower HRs and a slower rate of HR rise in premature infants (
26). Pitchler et al used late cord clamping strategy in their study. It was reported that late cord clamping causes lower HR in first 10 minutes of life (
27). In our study, similar to Dawson et al, HR of premature babies rose at first 5 minutes and then reached a steady speed in percentile chart.
The initial assessment cornerstone in first minute of life is considered to be a HR > 100 bpm in neonatal resuscitation algorithm. On the contrary, we found that the mean HR for premature infants was < 100 bpm at 1 minute. In addition, half of babies at 1st minute and 13% of babies at 2nd minute were found to have HR < 100 bpm. Same findings were also underlined by Dawson et al. (
25). Heart rate < 100 bpm at 1 minute of life is not a ventilation criterion alone and may be considered normal, it should be evaluated with respiratory effort and muscle tone and not isolated from other signs, it should not be an indication for immediate ventilation.
Oxygen saturation levels of premature babies in delivery room are lower than those of term babies as stated in NRP guidelines. Clinicians who use pulse oximetry in HR follow up of premature babies in delivery room should know that HR may be < 100 bpm in first minutes of life and should avoid unnecessary positive pressure ventilation. Percentile charts obtained from our study should help clinicians determine the approach to premature babies in delivery room.
4.1. Congress Presentation
The preliminary results of this survey have been presented at the 1st congress of joint European neonatal societies, September 16 - 20th, 2015 as an oral presentation.