Cover image of the article: The Specificity and Sensitivity of Transient Otoacustic Emission in Neonatal Hearing Screening  Compared with Diagnostic Test of Auditory Brain Stem Response in Tehran Hospitals

Image Credit:Inn J Pediatr

The Specificity and Sensitivity of Transient Otoacustic Emission in Neonatal Hearing Screening Compared with Diagnostic Test of Auditory Brain Stem Response in Tehran Hospitals

Authors

Jaleh Yousefi1,*, Mohammad Ajalloueyan2, Susan Amirsalari3, Mahdieh Hassanali Fard4
*Corresponding Author: Email: yousefidr@yahoo.com

Innovative Journal of Pediatrics:Vol. 23, issue 2; 199-204
Published online:Feb 07, 2013
Article type:Research Article
Received:Oct 14, 2012
Accepted:Jan 14, 2013
How to Cite:Yousefi J, Ajalloueyan M, Amirsalari S, Hassanali Fard M. The Specificity and Sensitivity of Transient Otoacustic Emission in Neonatal Hearing Screening Compared with Diagnostic Test of Auditory Brain Stem Response in Tehran Hospitals. Inn J Pediatr. 2013;23(2):. doi:

Abstract

Objective: Since early detection (specially before 6 months of age) of deaf people leads to better hearing and speech outcome after treatment, several clinical trials have been performed in order to find a cost effective, short duration screening test for diagnosis of neonatal hearing impairment. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of Transient Otoacustic Emission (TEOAE) test in newborns comparing with auditory brain stem response (ABR) in the age of 3 months and to analyze the association between risk factors and hearing loss in neonates.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted January2008 - May 2009 in Tehran. 1000 newborns (526 boys and 474 girls) were assessed. First, all of neonates were evaluated by TEOAE 24h after birth. If responses of OAE were failing, they were retested 10 to 15 days after birth by TEOAE. Also, All Neonates were assessed by ABR in the age of 3 months. Descriptive Statistics was used to analyze data.
Findings: Eighteen out of 1000 neonates failed double–checked TEOAE tests, of which 6 were confirmed by ABR test (12 false positive results). Nine out of 1000 neonates had impaired ABR tests, from these patients, 6 had failed OAE as well, but 3 had normal OAE (3 false negative results). From these 9 patients 2 had profound hearing loss and received cochlear implantation. We found that OAE has 66.7% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity in diagnosis of neonatal hearing impairment. Its positive and negative predictive value was 33.3% and 99.7% respectively. Also we did not find statistically significant relationship between hearing loss and risk factors.
Conclusion:  TEOAE as a simple, non-invasive, short duration and cost effective method, is a suitable test for neonatal hearing screening. Even though only two thirds of patients were detected by this method, 99.7% negative predictive value makes it a good screening test. We recommend OAE as a suitable primary neonatal hearing screening all over the country.

 

Highlights

References

  • 1.
    References are available on the PDF.

Copyright

© 2013, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

4
Aug
2021
On the Correlation Between Examination Day and the Referral Rate of Secondary Hearing Screening Among Non-high-risk Newborns

On the Correlation Between Examination Day and the Referral Rate of Secondary Hearing Screening Among Non-high-risk Newborns

Mingrong Nie,
Qingxiang Zeng,
Renzhong Luo,
Shengbao Yan,
Wenlong Liu

Nie M, Zeng Q, Luo R, Yan S, Liu W. On the Correlation Between Examination Day and the Referral Rate of Secondary Hearing Screening Among Non-high-risk Newborns. Inn J Pediatr. 2021;31(4):e108827. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.108827

16
Dec
2014
Newborn screening for hearing loss in Kosar hospital, Qazvin (2012)

Newborn screening for hearing loss in Kosar hospital, Qazvin (2012)

F yousefipoor,
H Mokrian

yousefipoor F, Mokrian H. Newborn screening for hearing loss in Kosar hospital, Qazvin (2012). J Inflamm Dis. 2024;18(5):e155864. doi:

19
Mar
2013
Frequency of Hearing Impairment among Full-term Newborns in Yazd, Iran

Frequency of Hearing Impairment among Full-term Newborns in Yazd, Iran

Zia Islami,
Mohammad-Hossein Baradaranfar,
Amir-Houshang Mehrparvar,
Abolfazl Mollasadeghi,
Mehrdad Mostaghaci,
Elham Naghshineh

Islami Z, Baradaranfar M, Mehrparvar A, Mollasadeghi A, Mostaghaci M, et al. Frequency of Hearing Impairment among Full-term Newborns in Yazd, Iran. Inn J Pediatr. 2013;23(3):. doi:

2
Nov
2016
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Automated Auditory Brainstem Response and Otoacoustic Emission in Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Automated Auditory Brainstem Response and Otoacoustic Emission in Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening

Saeed Heidari,
Alireza Olyaee Manesh,
Fatemeh Rajabi,
Mohammad Moradi-Joo

Heidari S, Olyaee Manesh A, Rajabi F, Moradi-Joo M. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Automated Auditory Brainstem Response and Otoacoustic Emission in Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening. Inn J Pediatr. 2017;27(2):e5229. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.5229

31
Mar
2012
Hearing Impairment in Congenitally Hypothyroid Patients

Hearing Impairment in Congenitally Hypothyroid Patients

Roya Kelishadi,
Somaye Sadeghi,
Massoud Amini,
Mostafa Hashemi,
Mahin Hashemipour,
Silva Hovsepian

Kelishadi R, Sadeghi S, Amini M, Hashemi M, Hashemipour M, et al. Hearing Impairment in Congenitally Hypothyroid Patients. Inn J Pediatr. 2016;22(1):. doi:

More by these authors

Jaleh YousefiPubMedScholar
Mohammad AjalloueyanPubMedScholar
Susan AmirsalariPubMedScholar
Mahdieh Hassanali FardPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics