Image Credit:

Letter to Editor: Microbial Contamination of Currency

Author(s):
Fabricio MotteranFabricio Motteran1,*
1Department of Hydraulics and Sanitation, Engineering School of Sao Carlos, University of Sao Paulo (USP), Brazil

Journal of Health Reports and Technology:Vol. 4, issue 1; e79609
Published online:Jan 28, 2018
Article type:Letter
Received:Dec 10, 2017
Accepted:Jan 10, 2018
How to Cite:Motteran F. Letter to Editor: Microbial Contamination of Currency. J Health Rep Technol. 2018;4(1):e79609. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhls.79609

Banknotes and coins are widely used throughout the world. They are exchanged and they come into contact with different environments and many different individuals during their circulation. Therefore, they can become contaminated with microorganisms and transfer bacteria across environments. Unhealthy conditions and unhealthy habits such as counting bills using saliva from the mouth to dampen the fingers can facilitate the transmission of microbial contamination (1, 2). These contaminations may be directly transmitted through contact with money by the hands or indirectly through exposure to food, water, or other objects (3). Based on some studies, the most commonly found microorganisms on the surfaces of banknotes and currency are Bacillus and Staphylococcus aurous species (4).
However, there is no evidence of any report of an outbreak of disease due to contaminated money (3). Referring to the literature, developing countries have the highest rates of money contamination. Vriesekoop et al. (2010) reported the contamination of coins and paper bills and found they were polluted with pathogenic agents such as Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella introbacterin (5). Also, in a similar study, about 93 species of bacteria belonging to Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterobacter, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Diptheroids, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia vulneris were detected on banknotes (6). Alemu (2014) reported that there was a bacterial contamination rate ranging from 60% to 100% on paper currency (7). Also, Alemu reported that the Bangladesh, India, Iraqi, Ghanaian, Saudi, Palestine, Mexico, Colombian, and South African banknotes and currency were contaminated with pathogenic and potentially pathogenic microorganisms. Thus, although there is sufficient information indicating money can transmit infections, the use of coins and banknotes in trading and business is a common occurrence. So, what should be done?
Uses of various types of credit cards in business and trading systems can decrease the number of transactions using banknotes and coins. Other suggestions are online shopping and using money counter devices instead of hand counting money.

References

  • 1.
    Lamichhane J, Adhikary S, Gautam P, Maharjan R, Dhakal B. Risk of handling paper currency in circulation chances of potential bacterial transmittance. Nepal J Sci Technol. 2009;10:161-6.
  • 2.
    Uneke CJ, Ogbu O. Potential for parasite and bacteria transmission by paper currency in Nigeria. J Environ Health. 2007;69(9):54-60. [PubMed ID: 17506357].
  • 3.
    Prasai T, Yami KD, Joshi DR. Microbial load on paper/polymer currency and coins. Nepal J Sci Technol. 2008;9:105-9.
  • 4.
    Xu J, Moore JE, Millar BC. Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) identification of the culturable bacterial flora on monetary coinage from 17 currencies. J Environ Health. 2005;67(7):51-5. [PubMed ID: 15794464].
  • 5.
    Vriesekoop F, Russell C, Alvarez-Mayorga B, Aidoo K, Yuan Q, Scannell A, et al. Dirty money: an investigation into the hygiene status of some of the world's currencies as obtained from food outlets. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010;7(12):1497-502. [PubMed ID: 20704502]. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0606.
  • 6.
    Ahmed MSU, Parveen S, Nasreen T, Feroza B. Evaluation of the microbial contamination of Bangladesh paper currency notes (Taka) in circulation. Adv Biol Res. 2010;4(5):266.
  • 7.
    Alemu A. Microbial contamination of currency notes and coins in circulation: A potential public health hazard. Biomedicine Biotechnol. 2014;2(3):46-53.

Similar Articles

31
Jan
2009

Worldwide Attention to Resistant Bacteria

Masoud Mardani

Mardani M. Worldwide Attention to Resistant Bacteria. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2009;4(1):. doi:

14
Dec
2016

Letter to Editor Articles in Iran: An Index for Critical Paper Reading

Hamidreza Karimi-Sari,
Mohammad Saeid Rezaee-Zavareh

Karimi-Sari H, Rezaee-Zavareh MS. Letter to Editor Articles in Iran: An Index for Critical Paper Reading. Thrita J Neu. 2016;5(4):e44522. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/thrita.44522

3
Aug
2016

Letter to the Editor: Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Neonatal Sepsis Pathogens

Anirban Mandal,
Puneet Kaur Sahi

Mandal A, Kaur Sahi P. Letter to the Editor: Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Neonatal Sepsis Pathogens. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2016;4(4):e40578. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.40578

30
Mar
2014

Facing to “Duplicate Submission” As a Scientific Misconduct

Seyyed Taha Yahyavi

Yahyavi ST. Facing to “Duplicate Submission” As a Scientific Misconduct. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2014;8(1):. doi:

31
Oct
2006

Emerging bacteria in the new millennium

Kenneth V I Rolston

V I Rolston K. Emerging bacteria in the new millennium. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2006;1(4):. doi:


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC