Progress of labor with epidural anesthesia in normal deliveries

Author(s):
F AmidiF Amidi, M KhanalihaM Khanaliha,*, A RezaeiA Rezaei
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Journal of Inflammatory Diseases:Vol. 5, issue 1; 20-24
Published online:Jun 30, 2001
Article type:Research Article
How to Cite:Amidi F, Khanaliha M, Rezaei A. Progress of labor with epidural anesthesia in normal deliveries. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;5(1):e154803. doi:

Abstract

Background: Findings a simple, lowcost and safe method for delivery is of great importance. Objective: To determine the duration of active phase and the second stage of vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial 36 patients were studied. 18 patients underwent epidural anesthesia as case group and 18 others with no anesthesia as control group. The duration of the active phase and the second stage of both methods and apgar score for both groups were compared. Findings: The duration of the active phase was less in the epidural anesthesia group (155.45±37.3 vs 169±48.14 min) where as the duration of the second stage was longer (78.18±22.29 vs 58.64±17.57 min). The apgar score second and C/S rates were the same in both groups. Conclusion: Vaginal delivery with epidural anesthesia is painless and safe.

Copyright

© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

1
Mar
2021

Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial

Farnad Imani,
Sarah Lotfi,
Javad Aminisaman,
Afshar Shahmohamadi,
Abbas Ahmadi

Imani F, Lotfi S, Aminisaman J, Shahmohamadi A, Ahmadi A. Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(1):e108335. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108335

2
Sep
2023

The effect of epidural analgesia on the clinical maternal and neonatal outcomes in parturients: a prospective cohort study

Masoomeh Nataj,
majid akrami

Nataj M, akrami M. The effect of epidural analgesia on the clinical maternal and neonatal outcomes in parturients: a prospective cohort study. koomesh. 2023;25(3):e152834. doi:

19
Mar
2010

Effects and side effects of combined spinal epidural analgesia on progress of labor and delivery

Shohreh Malek khosravi,
Negin Rezavend,
Ali Karbasfroushan,
Mariam Zanganeh,
Yeghaneh Mokri

Malek khosravi S, Rezavend N, Karbasfroushan A, Zanganeh M, Mokri Y. Effects and side effects of combined spinal epidural analgesia on progress of labor and delivery. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2010;13(4):e79584. doi:

25
Mar
2004

Study of effects of epidural analgesia on labor process

Naser Yeganeh

Yeganeh N. Study of effects of epidural analgesia on labor process. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2004;6(1):e95034. doi:

15
Feb
2006

Evaluation of the effect of epidural anesthesia with marcaine and fentanyl on labor course and neonatal apgar scores

MohammadReza Rafiei,
Fariba BehnamFar,
Maryam AbdolKhoda,
Gholamreza Mosavi

Rafiei M, BehnamFar F, AbdolKhoda M, Mosavi G. Evaluation of the effect of epidural anesthesia with marcaine and fentanyl on labor course and neonatal apgar scores. koomesh. 2006;7(1):e152082. doi:

Download PDF598.37 KB
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC