Cover image of the article: Comparing the effectiveness of Gutta-Percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment

Image Credit:J Inflamm Dis

Comparing the effectiveness of Gutta-Percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment

Authors

M Abbasi1,*, H Jahanbani, S Araghi1, D Sadeghi
1Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran Email: mabbasi@mail.com

Journal of Inflammatory Diseases:Vol. 16, issue 3; 33-39
Published online:Dec 31, 2012
Article type:Research Article
How to Cite:Abbasi M, Jahanbani H, Araghi S, Sadeghi D. Comparing the effectiveness of Gutta-Percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;16(3):e155707. doi:

Abstract

    Background: The goal of nonsurgical retreatment is the removal of all filling materials to completely disinfect the whole root canal space. Recently Resilon obturating system has been introduced as a root canal filling material.   Objective: To compare Gutta-percha and Resilon removal, using ProTaper rotary files with chloroform or heat in endodontic retreatment.   Methods: This experimental study was performed on sixty-four human single-canal lower jaw extracted premolars at Dental School, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences during 2010. Following separating teeth crowns from the cementoenamel junction, canals were instrumented using step-back technique with k-files. Later, the extracted teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 16 teeth. Canals were obturated with either gutta-percha/AH26 (groups 1,2) or Resilon/Epiphany (groups 3,4). Retreatment for groups 1 and 3 was performed with ProTaper system and heat and for groups 2 and 4 with ProTaper system and chloroform using crown-down technique. Once the retreatment procedure was completed and justified, roots were sectioned longitudinally and examined under stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using T-test, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests.   Findings: In all groups, some filling materials (core material and sealer) were seen on the canal walls. Although, amount of Gutta-Percha/AH26 and Resilon/Epiphany system residue were similar, the amount of residual materials in group 4 was significantly more than other groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, the amount of residual materials in group 3 was more than group 1 in the coronal third of canals (P<0.05). The time required to remove filling material in group 2 was significantly higher than those of other groups (P<0.05).   Conclusion: According to our findings, Resilon, like Gutta-percha, is re-treatable. However, none of these two materials could be completely removed from root canal walls.        

Highlights

Copyright

© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

24
Sep
2007
Evaluation of Apical Microleakage in MTA Apexification Model Filled with Thermoplastic Gutta percha, Luxa core Composite and Chemfil Glass – Ionomer

Evaluation of Apical Microleakage in MTA Apexification Model Filled with Thermoplastic Gutta percha, Luxa core Composite and Chemfil Glass – Ionomer

m Noormandi Poor,
M Rafeazadeh Shahi

Noormandi Poor M, Rafeazadeh Shahi M. Evaluation of Apical Microleakage in MTA Apexification Model Filled with Thermoplastic Gutta percha, Luxa core Composite and Chemfil Glass – Ionomer. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2007;9(3):e94787. doi:

27
Jun
2008
Effectiveness of 5% and 10% Deconex53plus in Rapid Decontamination of Gutta-percha Cones

Effectiveness of 5% and 10% Deconex53plus in Rapid Decontamination of Gutta-percha Cones

Maryam Mohammadi Sichani,
Baharak Bahreini,
Akbar Hasanzade,
Somaye Parsafar

Mohammadi Sichani M, Bahreini B, Hasanzade A, Parsafar S. Effectiveness of 5% and 10% Deconex53plus in Rapid Decontamination of Gutta-percha Cones. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2008;10(2):e94538. doi:

19
Aug
2023
The Effect of Different Sealer Removal Protocols on Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of Single Bond Plus to Dentin Exposed with Different Chemical Root Canal Irrigants: An Ex Vivo Study

The Effect of Different Sealer Removal Protocols on Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of Single Bond Plus to Dentin Exposed with Different Chemical Root Canal Irrigants: An Ex Vivo Study

Behnam Rousta,
Narges Farhad Molashahi,
Somayeh Hosseini Tabatabaei

Rousta B, Farhad Molashahi N, Hosseini Tabatabaei S. The Effect of Different Sealer Removal Protocols on Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of Single Bond Plus to Dentin Exposed with Different Chemical Root Canal Irrigants: An Ex Vivo Study. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2023;25(4):e131442. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-131442

27
Jun
2010
Antimicrobial evaluation of gutta-percha point containing calcium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide paste in infected root canal

Antimicrobial evaluation of gutta-percha point containing calcium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide paste in infected root canal

Eshagh A Saberi,
Narges Farhad-Molashahi,
Mehdi Mohammadi

Saberi EA, Farhad-Molashahi N, Mohammadi M. Antimicrobial evaluation of gutta-percha point containing calcium hydroxide and calcium hydroxide paste in infected root canal. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2010;12(2):e94308. doi:

22
Feb
2025
Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Microcrack Using M3 ProGold, Mtwo Rotary File and Hand File in Root Canal Therapy: An In-Vitro Study

Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Microcrack Using M3 ProGold, Mtwo Rotary File and Hand File in Root Canal Therapy: An In-Vitro Study

Reyhaneh Shoorgashti,
Marzie Jafari,
Mohadeseh Alimohammadi,
Niloofar Ebrahimi

Shoorgashti R, Jafari M, Alimohammadi M, Ebrahimi N. Comparative Evaluation of Dentinal Microcrack Using M3 ProGold, Mtwo Rotary File and Hand File in Root Canal Therapy: An In-Vitro Study. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud. 2025;12(2):e151650. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/mejrh-151650

More by these authors

H JahanbaniPubMedScholar
D SadeghiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics