Journal of Inflammatory Diseases
The Official Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Genome-based Detection of Novel Coronavirus: An Overview Study
Authors
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019, named COVID-19 is a global problem. According to the declaration of the World Health Organization (WHO), it is a novel and extreme outbreak, spreading worldwide. Firstly, numerous patients reported exposure in Wuhan City, China at a large animals and seafood market. Accordingly, the first idea is suggesting the animal-to-human transmission of this infection pathogen. Next, since then, numerous patients have decelerated no exposure to animal shops, indicating that human-to-human transmission is occurring. The new coronavirus (2019-nCoV) is a positive RNA virus with a 29.8 kb genome and S, E, M, N, and Orf1 gene fragments. The most popular method for 2019-nCoV detection is genomebased approaches, like Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based tests that require expensive experimental equipment, a controlled working environment, and high-trained technicians; they are often lacking in massive viral outbreaks. Therefore, another rapid and simple genome-based assay was evaluated for this pathogen. In this review study, the RT-LAMP technique, as the main isothermal amplification assays with less time consumption and without the need for expensive equipment, compared to conventional PCR-based methods to 2019-nCoV identification, was discussed. Accordingly, the advantage or disadvantage of these techniques was compared. The obtained data indicated that this molecular and isothermal method could be used as a successful one-step process for portable screening and the rapid identification of 2019-nCoV.
Highlights
Copyright
© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Different Respiratory Samples for COVID-19 Detection by Standard and Direct Quantitative RT-PCR: A Literature Review
Ahmadzadeh M, Vahidi H, Mahboubi A, Hajifathaliha F, Nematollahi L, et al. Different Respiratory Samples for COVID-19 Detection by Standard and Direct Quantitative RT-PCR: A Literature Review. Iran J Pharm Res. 2021;20(3):e124308. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2021.115458.15383
Different Laboratory Diagnosis Methods of COVID-19: A Systematic Review
Omidifar N, Bagheri Lankarani K, Moghadami M, Shokripour M, Chashmpoosh M, et al. Different Laboratory Diagnosis Methods of COVID-19: A Systematic Review. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2021;16(1):e110667. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.110667
Utility of Available Methods for Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples
Shirvani A, Azimi L, Mansour Ghanaie R, Alebouyeh M, Fallah F, et al. Utility of Available Methods for Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2020;8(3):e103677. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.103677
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Existence in Blood, Urine, and Rectal Swab in Positive Patients with Different Virus Titers
Mondanizadeh M, Rahimi E, Sarmadian H, Jamalian M, Khansarinejad B. Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Existence in Blood, Urine, and Rectal Swab in Positive Patients with Different Virus Titers. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2020;13(8):e106534. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.106534
Enhancing Rapid Detection of COVID-19: Optimization of RT-LAMP Assays for Improved Sensitivity and Specificity
Fahimirad S, Ganji A, Alizadeh H, Khansarinejad B, Abtahi H. Enhancing Rapid Detection of COVID-19: Optimization of RT-LAMP Assays for Improved Sensitivity and Specificity. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2025;18(8):e160288. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-160288
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 1 week ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 1 week ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 1 week ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 5 days ago