Metallo-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria are clinically important carbapenem-resistant pathogens that produce enzymes capable of hydrolyzing most β-lactam antibiotics, resulting in limited treatment options and rapid dissemination in healthcare settings. MBL-producing clinical Enterobacteriaceae have been reported worldwide and often exhibit extensive antimicrobial resistance (
9). Studying MBL-producing uropathogens in an apparently healthy university population is important, particularly given the high degree of social mixing, frequent empiric antibiotic use, and limited routine screening in such environments (
10). In these settings, individuals may act as community reservoirs for highly resistant uropathogenic strains.
Hospital- and community-based studies have consistently indicated that
E. coli is the most common uropathogen, closely followed by
Klebsiella pneumoniae (
11). Studies from Cameroon, Ghana, and Bangladesh have similarly identified
E. coli as a predominant uropathogen, with
K. pneumoniae frequently among the most prevalent organisms (
12-
14). Research focusing on Nigerian student groups has also reported
E. coli as a common isolate, although some studies have noted relatively high rates of
Klebsiella (
15). These species are important MBL-producing organisms and may contribute to antimicrobial resistance reservoirs (
12).
High resistance to penicillins, tetracyclines, and chloramphenicol, as well as substantial resistance to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, was observed, particularly among
E. coli and
K. pneumoniae. Similar multidrug resistance in uropathogens has been reported in other settings (
14,
16). In many low- and middle-income countries, long-term, low-cost, and sometimes unregulated use of these agents in human medicine and agriculture may have contributed to increased resistance and a high prevalence of resistance determinants in the environment (
17). The moderate susceptibility patterns to quinolones and high resistance to fluoroquinolones, particularly among
K. pneumoniae and
Proteus spp., are consistent with findings reported by Shanta et al. (
13). The resistance profile observed in this population may reflect previous antimicrobial exposure, self-medication, and the circulation of antimicrobial resistance determinants, particularly among Enterobacterales (
17). The reduced effectiveness of older, less expensive agents may compromise empirical therapy and increase the risk of treatment failure, prolonged illness, and onward transmission.