A compartive study on the prevalence of cesarean section and macrosomia of gestational diabetes using the diagnostic criteria of the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups and American diabetes association

Author(s):
mojgan rahmanianmojgan rahmanian, Sanam MoradanSanam Moradan,*, majid mirmohammadkhanimajid mirmohammadkhani, farzane khroshifarzane khroshi
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Koomesh:Vol. 17, issue 2; 336-342
Published online:Mar 28, 2016
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jan 02, 2015
Accepted:Sep 01, 2015
How to Cite:rahmanian M, Moradan S, mirmohammadkhani M, khroshi F. A compartive study on the prevalence of cesarean section and macrosomia of gestational diabetes using the diagnostic criteria of the international association of the diabetes and pregnancy study groups and American diabetes association. koomesh. 2016;17(2):e151350. doi:

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean because macrosomia of fetus more happens in cases with gestational diabetes. There are different methods and outcomes for screening of gestational diabetes. In current study comparison between two accepted method of diagnosis of gestational diabetes, American diabetes association (ADA) and international association of diabetes in pregnancy study group (IADPSG) in occurrence of cesarean and macrosomia of fetus was preformed. Materials and methods: All pregnant women between 24-28 weeks of gestation from April 2013 that were referred to Amir Hospital or private office of gynecologist were evaluated. They were evaluated by both ADA and IADPSG tests. If the gestational diabetes was confirmed they were followed until delivery and the prevalence of macrosomia and cesarean were surveyed. Results: Among 236 cases the prevalence of gestational diabetes were 16(7%) and 20(8%) in IADPSG and ADA (P=0.001, kappa=0.219) and the rate of cesarean were 10(62.5%) and 11(55%) in IADPSG and ADA   respectively. The prevalence of fetal macrosomia were 5(31.2%) and 2(10%) in IADPSG and ADA   respectively. Conclusion: The percent of gestational diabetes was more with IADPSG. However, two methods have agreement in diagnosis of diabetes but the agreement was not strong. The prevalence of cesarean and macrosomia was more in ADA. It seems that two methods are not equal in diagnosis and prediction of complications of gestational diabetes

Copyright

© 2016, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

6
Oct
2019
International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Comparison of the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group Criteria with the Old American Diabetes Association Criteria for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Mahtab Niroomand,
Jamileh Afsar,
Farhad Hosseinpanah,
Maryam Afrakhteh,
Farah Farzaneh,
Sara Serahati

Niroomand M, Afsar J, Hosseinpanah F, Afrakhteh M, Farzaneh F, et al. Comparison of the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group Criteria with the Old American Diabetes Association Criteria for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;17(4):e88343. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.88343

30
Jun
2008

Prevalence of gestational diabetes and comparison of mean maternal age in healthy and gestational diabetic patients at Javaheri hospital (2003-2006)

M Hematyar,
M Khabiri

Hematyar M, Khabiri M. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and comparison of mean maternal age in healthy and gestational diabetic patients at Javaheri hospital (2003-2006). J Inflamm Dis. 2024;12(1):e155381. doi:

20
Apr
2015

The Risk Factors and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome in Women With Previous Gestational Diabetes

Majid Valizadeh,
Nooshin Alavi,
Saeideh Mazloomzadeh,
Zahra Piri,
Hamidreza Amirmoghadami

Valizadeh M, Alavi N, Mazloomzadeh S, Piri Z, Amirmoghadami H. The Risk Factors and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome in Women With Previous Gestational Diabetes. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;13(2):e21696. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.21696

20
Jun
2022
J Health Rep Technol

Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes in Diabetic and Healthy Women

Mostafa Jafari,
Hadis Fattahi,
Leila Sheikhy,
Sodabeh Eskandari,
Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh

Jafari M, Fattahi H, Sheikhy L, Eskandari S, Mirzaei-Alavijeh M. Comparison of Pregnancy Outcomes in Diabetic and Healthy Women. J Health Rep Technol. 2022;8(3):e119317. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jhrt-119317

1
Jan
2008

Comparison of Universal and Risk Factor Based Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Maryam Khooshideh,
A Shahriari

Khooshideh M, Shahriari A. Comparison of Universal and Risk Factor Based Screening Strategies for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Shiraz E-Med J. 2008;9(1):. doi:

Download PDF483.55 KB
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles