Koomesh
Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences
Comparative study of central motor conduction time by using magnetic stimulation and F-wave study in normal subjects
Abstract
Introduction: Central motor conduction time (CMCT) includes time for excitation of the corticospinal pathways and transmission along those tracts. Data obtained by cortical magnetic stimulation are helpful in some clinical situations such as multiple sclerosis, cervical spondylosis, motor neuron disease, and etc. However, using different methods for peripheral motor conduction time (PMCT) demonsrates two different results. In this study, we used two methods to compare CMCT from F- wave latency and spinal root magnetic stimulation. Also, this study was performed to determine normal values, effects of sex, age and upper limb length. Matrials and Methods: Magnetic stimulation of the cortex and cervical spinal roots was performed on 39 healthy subjects. Responces were recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. F-wave study was performed in the median nerve. Subtraction of total motor conduction time (TMCT: cortical response) and PMCT by F-wave and cervical root stimulation, shows CMCT. Results: The results showed 19.7 ms for TMCT, 7.3 ms for CMCT of root stimulation and 4.8 for F-wave based CMCT. CMCT to the APB correlates with upper limb length but no with age or sex. Conclusions: The CMCT calculated by subtracting F- wave latencies measured to APB after transcranial stimulation was shorter than the one obtained after magnetic root stimulation.
Copyright
© 2007, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Bilateral responses of trapezius muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects
Tavana B, Dehghanni F, RezaSoltani Z, RezaieMoghadam F, Azma K, et al. Bilateral responses of trapezius muscle to transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects. koomesh. 2008;9(3):e152191. doi:
Co-contraction of Agonist and Antagonist Muscles Increased Corticospinal Excitability and Muscular Activity in Arm Muscles
Basereh A, Rajabi H, Pirani H. Co-contraction of Agonist and Antagonist Muscles Increased Corticospinal Excitability and Muscular Activity in Arm Muscles. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2025;27(4):e159654. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/zjrms-159654
Comparison of Relaxometry Between Ulnar Nerve and Posterior Tibial Nerve After Cisatracurium Administration Using Electromyography
Radkowski P, Grond S, Brunner H, Wolska J, Dawidowska-Fidrych J, et al. Comparison of Relaxometry Between Ulnar Nerve and Posterior Tibial Nerve After Cisatracurium Administration Using Electromyography. Anesth Pain Med. 2023;13(1):e132866. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-132866
The study of wrist position effect on conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve
Tavana B, RezaeiMoghadam F, RezaSoltani Z, Salak R. The study of wrist position effect on conduction velocity of the ulnar nerve. koomesh. 2003;4(3):e151986. doi:
Investigation of the Effect of Hypnotic Anesthesia on Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV)
Fathi M, Azhari A, Zanguee A, Joudi M, Jamali-Behnam F, et al. Investigation of the Effect of Hypnotic Anesthesia on Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV). Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(3):e67859. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.67859
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 21 hours ago
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC
Author(s):