Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is extensively used as an effective treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) and other clinically indicated conditions. The goal of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), both Acetyl Salicylic Acid (ASA) and additional inhibitors of the platelet receptor P2Y12 in the months following stent placement is to prevent local thrombotic and systemic thromboembolic events (
1). Evidence from randomized controlled trials suggest a minimum of 3 to 6 months DAPT duration, however, extension of DAPT beyond 12 months has contradictory results (
2).
Dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation following PCI is common, in which the physician-directed withdrawal is the most frequent mode within 2 years of stent implantation (
3). The second major reason of DAPT discontinuation is drug disruption due to bleeding or non-compliance, and the third reason is the interruption due to surgical indication (
3). Various comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and previous myocardial infarction (MI) has been observed to be associated with DAPT non-adherence (
4,
5). On the other hand, socioeconomically deprived individuals, i.e. ones with lower education, are also prone to DAPT non-adherence (
6).
In the searching for cardinal complications of post-PCI DAPT non-adherence, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) have been extensively studied. MACE include MI, indicated re-angioplasty, cardiac death and stent thrombosis (
3). Interestingly, the majority of adverse events occurred in individuals who were entirely adherent to the DAPT; yet, disruption owing to poor compliance or significant bleeding enhanced the MACE risk in non-adherent patients (
3).