Sign in

Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals

e-ISSN 2538-5550
Authors GuideSubmit manuscript
Cover image of the article: Redo -tricuspid valve replacement, technical consideration; valve in valve insertion

Image Credit:Multidiscip Cardio Annal

Outline

Redo -tricuspid valve replacement, technical consideration; valve in valve insertion

Authors

gholamreza OMRANI1,*
1Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: gholamreza OMRANI, Iran Email: omrani@rhc.acir
Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals:Vol. 4, issue 2 & 3; e8776
Published online:Aug 14, 2012
Article type:Case Report
Received:Sep 14, 2016
Accepted:Jul 12, 2012
How to Cite:OMRANI G. Redo -tricuspid valve replacement, technical consideration; valve in valve insertion. Multidiscip Cardio Annal. 2012;4(2 & 3):e8776. doi:

Abstract

With increasing life expectancy, as the general population ages, reoperation for valvular
heart disease continue to increase. Structural failure of bioprosthesis and progression of
native valve disease are leading causes of reoperation in tricuspid position (1). Reoperation
is technically more difficult than primary operation and has been associated with
higher mortality due to adhesion, the presence of more advanced cardiac pathology and
the existence of more frequent co-morbidity. Peripheral cannulation, right thoracotomy
and alternative surgical technique can be used to decrease mortality and morbidity

Keywordstricuspid valvereoperationsurgical technique

Fulltext

Full Text Available is PDF

References

  • 1.
    Full Text Available is PDF.

Copyright

© 2012, Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Annals. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

30
Jun
2013
Tricuspid Valve Replacement, Mechnical vs. Biological Valve, Which Is Better?

Tricuspid Valve Replacement, Mechnical vs. Biological Valve, Which Is Better?

Haitham Akram Altaani,
Saed Jaber
PDF

Altaani HA, Jaber S. Tricuspid Valve Replacement, Mechnical vs. Biological Valve, Which Is Better?. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2017;7(2):e12708. doi:

21
Feb
2007
Surgical Management of Small Aortic Root

Surgical Management of Small Aortic Root

Alireza Alizadeh Ghavidel
PDF

Alizadeh Ghavidel A. Surgical Management of Small Aortic Root. Multidiscip Cardio Annal. 2007;1(3):e8681. doi:

31
Mar
2017
Implanting CRT via Endo-Cardiac Route When Tricuspid Valve is Metallic

Implanting CRT via Endo-Cardiac Route When Tricuspid Valve is Metallic

Mohammad Vahid Jorat,
Amir Aslani,
Mohammad hossein Nikoo
PDF

Jorat MV, Aslani A, Nikoo MH. Implanting CRT via Endo-Cardiac Route When Tricuspid Valve is Metallic. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2017;8(1):e12059. doi:

21
Feb
2013
Midterm Outcome of Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in North West of Iran

Midterm Outcome of Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in North West of Iran

ramin Baghaei
PDF

Baghaei R. Midterm Outcome of Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in North West of Iran. Multidiscip Cardio Annal. 2013;5(1):e8780. doi:

11
Sep
2016
Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Is There Any Place for Mechanical Valves?

Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Is There Any Place for Mechanical Valves?

B. Askari,
M. Sharifi
PDF

Askari B, Sharifi M. Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: Is There Any Place for Mechanical Valves?. Multidiscip Cardio Annal. 2011;3(2):e8743. doi:

More by these authors

gholamreza OMRANIPubMedScholar

Find related work

PubMed
Google Scholar
Create citation alert
Download PDF242.47 KB
Share
Cited by
Metrics
Comments
Number of Comments:0