The prevalence of UP in our study was estimated at 54.01%. Several studies reported a range of 10% to 85% for UP. This broad range may explain the different used measures; for example, some studies evaluated the lifetime prevalence of UP, while others only evaluated the current prevalence of UP. We estimated the current prevalence of UP in our study. The burden and prevalence of UP are often undervalued. Since the increase in the survival of ESRD will increase the number of patients on HD, UP is highly important. The high prevalence of UP in our study may be explained by improper cooperation of HD patients with their physicians, inadequate therapy, and inappropriate response to treatment.
The results of our study demonstrated that HD patients experienced a moderate itch, which may, to some extent, clarify why UP is underestimated among HD patients. The pathophysiology of pruritus in ESRD is poorly identified. Based on several observational and clinical trials, there are rising data that UP is a systemic rather than an isolated cutaneous disorder (
4,
9). It is assumed to be due to the imbalance of Th1 cytokines and the presence of a proinflammatory state. Also, the C-reactive protein level is much higher in ESRD patients. Kimmel et al. found that HD patients had a prominent increased level of IL-6 and Th1 cytokines (
4). Peripheral neuropathy is common in ESRD. One hypothesis is that the itch in ESRD could be related to neuropathy. However, other studies do not support it.
Many other pathways were postulated in the pathophysiology of ESRD pruritus. Another possible reason for ESRD itch was the inadequate removal of medium molecular weight uremic toxins (
10). Recently, it was found that the removal of small molecular toxins with greater efficiency by standard assessment of Kt/V was related to ESRD itch (
3).
The main strength of our investigation is that, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate a large HD population regarding FGF23 levels and UP. Previously, a letter evaluated 18 cases of UP and could not find any association between UP and FGF23 levels (
11). The small number of cases in that study was a notable limitation. Other studies evaluated FGF23 in CKD patients.
FGF23, a novel disease biomarker in nephrology, is a significant player in regulating calcium, phosphate, and mineral bone homeostasis (
12,
13). FGF23 is constructed and secreted in bone by osteocytes. However, the primary target tissues are the distal nephron and the parathyroid gland. The FGF23 receptor complex consists of two components of FGF receptor 1c (FGFR1c) and membrane-bound αKlotho, both expressed in target tissues (
14-
16). When FGF23 binds to its receptor, signal transduction occurs in the cytoplasm by activating tyrosine kinases (
9-
11). FGF23 regulates phosphate reabsorption in the kidney, PTH secretion, and vitamin D metabolism.
Therefore, FGF23 prevents positive phosphate balance and hyperphosphatemia. Consequently, observations showed that CKD patients have a substantial increase in serum FGF23 levels through their compromised renal phosphate clearance (
14).
Remarkably, epidemiological studies in both the general population and patients with kidney disease demonstrated an association of FGF23 with significant medical results related to inflammation, cardiovascular disease, and mortality (
17-
19). The association between FGF23 and mortality enrolled patients on dialysis; FGF23 was unlikely to impact tubular function in that population, indicating another mechanism of action14.
Also, after adjusting for potential confounders, including phosphate concentrations, the association between FGF23 and mortality was not attenuated. Thus, adjustment only supported the link between FGF23 concentrations and mortality. 14ver aside from its impact on renal phosphate, FGF23 influences vitamin D metabolism, which also occurs in the convoluted tubule.
The conversion of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol to 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol is prevented by inhibiting the 1-hydroxylase enzyme, which is responsible for this metabolic step13ver. On the other hand, FGF23 endorses vitamin D catabolism by up-regulating 24-hydroxylase, which inactivates 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. So, a decrease in circulating active vitamin D is essential in the phosphate-lowering effects of FGF23. Also, the decrease in active vitamin D diminishes the gastrointestinal uptake of phosphate (
20,
21).
In our study, the mean vitamin D level was 33.82 ± 17.06, and the median FGF23 level was 412.09 ± 428.93. Obviously, the balance was distorted in our HD patients. The increased FGF23 level and phosphate secretion were expected since the kidneys’ filtration function was decreased.
PTH secretion is also influenced by FGF23 (
20,
21). In CKD, the role of constantly increasing FGF23 levels in the progression of hyperparathyroidism opens a discussion. The FGF receptor is down-regulated in the parathyroid gland in uremic situations, thus bringing to mind FGF23 resistance (
22).
Our study showed no significant difference between the two groups of HD patients regarding serum-calcium, serum-phosphate, and 25(OH) D3 values (
11,
23).
In our study, FGF23 levels were not significantly different between patients with and without UP and did not show any association with pruritus in HD patients. Thus, the role of this protein in the pathogenesis of UP in HD remains questionable.
Notably, epidemiological research found a statistically significant relationship between FGF23 levels and C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 levels in CKD patients (
24). The fact that inflammation is a significant inducer of FGF23 release from bone cells may help to explain the previously reported association (
25-
27).
In our study, HD patients with UP did not exhibit significantly higher CRP levels than those without UP. This is in line with other observational studies (
23). But, some previous experimental studies did not find such associations (
4,
5,
11). More research is needed to identify whether inflammation is a cause of persistent pruritus in hemodialysis patients and determine the specific involved pathways.
The mean FGF23 level in our study was correlated with the duration of dialysis (42.00 ± 46.84 months). Also, Negishi et al. found that the serum FGF23 level in dialysis patients was 1171 ± 553 pg/mL. The mean dialysis duration was 5.8 ± 5.0 years, and the concentration of FGF23 increased with the duration of dialysis (
28).
Concerning the present study’s limitations, we did not evaluate FGF23 levels at the beginning and end of one dialysis session for each patient. We could not assess the changes in PTH, calcitriol, and other minerals. In this study, residual kidney function was also not evaluated due to the administration limitations and the lack of cooperation of patients for 24-hour urine collection. The level of cooperation of patients could be a limitation.
In conclusion, UP needs serious attention because of its increasing frequency and subsequent burden. This study found no linear correlation between UP and FGF23 levels.