Adult Sporadic Multifocal Renal Cell Carcinoma: Helical CT and Pathology Correlations in a Recent and Consecutive Set of Patients Assessed According to a Multidisciplinary Approach

Authors

Antonio B Porcaro1,*, Filippo Migliorini2, Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli2, Giulio Cesaro2, Elisa Pomaro2, Claudio Ghimenton2, Carmelo Monaco2, Emanuele Rubilotta2, Vincenzo Lacola2, Mario Romano2, Luigi Comunale2, Teodoro Sava2
1Department of Urology, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Azienda Ospedaliera, [email protected], Italy
2Department of Urology, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Azienda Ospedaliera, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Department of Urology, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Azienda Ospedaliera, [email protected], Italy. Email: [email protected]

Nephro-Urology Monthly:Vol. 2, issue 2; 361-367
Published online:Apr 30, 2010
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 11, 2009
Accepted:Aug 06, 2009
How to Cite:Porcaro A, Migliorini F, Antoniolli S, Cesaro G, Pomaro E, et al. Adult Sporadic Multifocal Renal Cell Carcinoma: Helical CT and Pathology Correlations in a Recent and Consecutive Set of Patients Assessed According to a Multidisciplinary Approach. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2010;2(2):. doi:

Abstract

Background and Aims:  To assess helical CT sensitivity in detecting preoperatively Multifocal Renal Cell carcinoma (MFRCC) and clinical occult multifocality in a contemporary and consecutive set of patients according to a multidisciplinary approach. 

Methods: The renal masses were assessed preoperatively by volumetric multislice helical CT with the objective to detect multifocality. Renal cells carcinoma (RCCs) were classified as unifocal (UF) or multifocal (MF). MFRCCs were selected in 2 groups including CT detected (CT+) and CT undetected (CT-). RCCs were classified in UF and MF. MFRCCs were selected in 2 groups including CT+ and CT-. CT and pathologic findings of MFRCCs were correlated and CT sensitivity was assessed. Statistical methods were performed in order  to compare the CT sensitivity with the overall mean sensitivity calculated from the reported literature, to assess statistical inference between UF and MF - RCCs; and to detect statistical significance between CT(+) and CT(-) MFRCCs .

Results: Over a period of 24 months, 116 kidney units (KU) of 111 patients were surgically treated for RCC. Multifocality was assessed in 13/116 KU of 12 patients (10.8%). Helical CT detected preoperative multifocality in 8/111 patients (7.2%) and preoperative occult multifocality was assessed in 4 (3.6%), as well. Helical CT sensitivity difference between our (66.7%) and the reported literature experience (22.9%) was significant (p <0.0001). Significant predictors for multifocality were tumor size (p = 0.007), laterality (p = 0.002), pT (p = 0.008) and surgery (p = 0.0002). Primary tumor size (p = 0.05) and satellite tumor size (p = 0.01) were significantly correlated to CT-undetected (CT-) multifocal tumors. 

Conclusions: In our experience, helical CT was effective in improving preoperative detection of sporadic primary MRCC as well as in lowering clinical occult multifocality. Clinical predictors of multifocality including bilaterality and primary tumor size as well as technical and methodological improvements in performing Helical CT will improve its sensibility in detecting renal masses less than 0.5 cm. CT preoperative detection of clinical multifocality may help in planning effective preoperative surgical treatment as well as lowering local recurrence after nephron sparing surgery.

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2010, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

20
Jul
2021
Metanephric Adenoma: A Case Report of a Rare Benign Renal Tumor

Metanephric Adenoma: A Case Report of a Rare Benign Renal Tumor

Farzad Allameh,
Mahsa Ahadi,
Saba Faraji,
Seyyed Ali Hojjati

Allameh F, Ahadi M, Faraji S, Hojjati SA. Metanephric Adenoma: A Case Report of a Rare Benign Renal Tumor. Int J Cancer Manag. 2021;14(7):e112003. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm.112003

28
Feb
2014

Approach to Renal Incidentaloma

Elnaz Ghasemi,
Hamidreza Haghighatkhah

Ghasemi E, Haghighatkhah H. Approach to Renal Incidentaloma. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21418. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21418

7
Aug
2024
Diagnostic Value of T2-MRI in Incidental Cystic Renal Masses on Lumbar Spine MRI

Diagnostic Value of T2-MRI in Incidental Cystic Renal Masses on Lumbar Spine MRI

Ayeh Sargaran,
Amin Mashhadi,
Ali Alidadi,
Sharareh Sanei-Sistani,
Mahshid Mashhadi,
Mohadeseh Zadehmir

Sargaran A, Mashhadi A, Alidadi A, Sanei-Sistani S, Mashhadi M, et al. Diagnostic Value of T2-MRI in Incidental Cystic Renal Masses on Lumbar Spine MRI. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2024;16(3):e145678. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly-145678

11
Oct
2021
Use of Histogram Analysis in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiation of Renal Tumor Subgroups

Use of Histogram Analysis in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiation of Renal Tumor Subgroups

Gurcan Erbay,
Mehmet Resit Goren,
Elif Karadeli,
Burcak Pekoz,
Zafer Koc,
Sami Arica

Erbay G, Goren MR, Karadeli E, Pekoz B, Koc Z, et al. Use of Histogram Analysis in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiation of Renal Tumor Subgroups. I J Radiol. 2021;18(4):e110963. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.110963

20
Jun
2017

Is Radical Nephrectomy for Patients with Kidney Tumors a Risk Factor for Chronic Kidney Disease?

Mohamad Hosein Nourbala,
Alireza Ghadian,
Zohreh Rostami,
Shahin Abbaszadeh,
Mahdi Azarabadi,
Mahmod Salesi

Nourbala MH, Ghadian A, Rostami Z, Abbaszadeh S, Azarabadi M, et al. Is Radical Nephrectomy for Patients with Kidney Tumors a Risk Factor for Chronic Kidney Disease?. Nephro-Urol Mon. 2017;9(6):e13105. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.13105

More by these authors

Antonio PorcaroPubMedScholar
Filippo MiglioriniPubMedScholar
Stefano AntoniolliPubMedScholar
Giulio CesaroPubMedScholar
Elisa PomaroPubMedScholar
Claudio GhimentonPubMedScholar
Carmelo MonacoPubMedScholar
Emanuele RubilottaPubMedScholar
Vincenzo LacolaPubMedScholar
Mario RomanoPubMedScholar
Luigi ComunalePubMedScholar
Teodoro SavaPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics