Cover image of the article: Study of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment "

Image Credit:Zahedan J Res Med Sci

Study of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment "

Authors

A Keykhaei1,*, Ali Navidian2, Mohammad Ali Tabasi3, GH Sargazi1
1Anesthesia dept, faculty of medicine, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.
2Nursing dept, faculty of nursing and midwifery education, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.
3Librarian ship dept, faculty of medicine, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Anesthesia dept, faculty of medicine, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran. Email: keykhaei@archive.com

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences:Vol. 4, issue 3; e95329
Published online:Aug 08, 2019
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 01, 2002
Accepted:Jul 31, 2002
How to Cite:Keykhaei A, Navidian A, Tabasi MA, Sargazi G. Study of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment ". Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2002;4(3):e95329. doi:

Abstract

University faculty members can be evaluated in different ways. One of the most controversial
ways is an assessment, which is done by students.
The present cross sectional study investigates the views held by 83 basic sciences faculty
members on faculty members’ assessment in 1380. The required data gathered through
questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS statistical software.
Findings shows that 60.1% of the research population determined the assessment by students,
more than 20% of the total score which is followed by research plans with 20.8%, self assessment
with 19.5%, group manager with 16.9%, assessment by colleagues with 13%, taught unit courses
with 8.9% and finally assessment by Faculty education deputy with 5.2%.
Research population believes that: personal grudges 57.9%, dishonesty 85.6% and carelessness
89.1% affects assessment forms.
Finally, On the basis of the findings, it can be said that if we wish to have a reliable evaluation
of faculty members, we should use different assessment methods simultaneously.

Highlights

Fulltext

The full text of this article is available on the PDF file.

References

  • 1.
    The References of this article are available on the PDF file.

Copyright

© 2002, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

5
Apr
2009
Factors Affecting Faculty Evaluation By Students In Kerman University Of Medical Sciences

Factors Affecting Faculty Evaluation By Students In Kerman University Of Medical Sciences

Esmat Nouhi,
Saeedeh Farajzadeh,
Ashraf Adhami

Nouhi E, Farajzadeh S, Adhami A. Factors Affecting Faculty Evaluation By Students In Kerman University Of Medical Sciences. J Med Edu. 2002;2(1):e104979. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v2i1.890

24
Apr
2008
The view of faculties and medical students about evaluation of faculty teaching experiences

The view of faculties and medical students about evaluation of faculty teaching experiences

Mitra Amini,
Marzi HonarDar

Amini M, HonarDar M. The view of faculties and medical students about evaluation of faculty teaching experiences. koomesh. 2008;9(3):e152188. doi:

1
Oct
2005
Evaluation of Faculty Members by Students in Birjand University of Medicine, 2003-2004

Evaluation of Faculty Members by Students in Birjand University of Medicine, 2003-2004

Masood Ziaie,
M Mirie,
MR Haji Abadi,
H Mehrijoofard

Ziaie M, Mirie M, Haji Abadi M, Mehrijoofard H. Evaluation of Faculty Members by Students in Birjand University of Medicine, 2003-2004. J Med Edu. 2005;8(1):e105239. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v8i1.752

19
Aug
2013
Comparing Student’s Assessment of the Faculty Member’s Training Performance and Faculty Member’s Self-Assessment at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

Comparing Student’s Assessment of the Faculty Member’s Training Performance and Faculty Member’s Self-Assessment at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

Mansour Rezaei,
Sabour Bijan

Rezaei M, Bijan S. Comparing Student’s Assessment of the Faculty Member’s Training Performance and Faculty Member’s Self-Assessment at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Educ Res Med Sci. 2013;2(1):e77209. doi:

11
Apr
2009
The Effect Of Contextual Factors On Results Of Teaching Evaluation In College Of Medicine, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences (2003)

The Effect Of Contextual Factors On Results Of Teaching Evaluation In College Of Medicine, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences (2003)

Z Meshkani,
F Hossein Abadie

Meshkani Z, Hossein Abadie F. The Effect Of Contextual Factors On Results Of Teaching Evaluation In College Of Medicine, Tehran University Of Medical Sciences (2003). J Med Edu. 2004;6(1):e105141. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v6i1.813

More by these authors

A KeykhaeiPubMedScholar
Ali NavidianPubMedScholar
Mohammad Ali TabasiPubMedScholar
GH SargaziPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics