The aim of this study was to determine the effect of two different methods of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on kidney function based on the KDIGO criteria in patients with low cardiac output syndrome. The most important finding of this study was a statistical difference in different stages of AKI between the groups of surgery. This finding revealed that off-pump CABG privileged on-pump CABG in the AKI incidence in low cardiac output syndrome patients. This finding is in line with those of other studies (
5,
13-
16). On the other hand, some studies (
3,
17,
18) reported different findings. This contradiction may be due to the patients’ status after cardiac surgery (low cardiac output syndrome) and different inclusion and exclusion criteria. This is approved by Ding et al. (
10) that showed patients with LCOS after isolated CABG had different degrees of multi-organ dysfunction, especially kidney function.
The results of the comparison of demographic variables showed a lack of significant differences between them and the method of surgery. This finding is consistent with Ghanei et al. (
14) and Houlind et al. (
6) studies. One of the reasons for the similarities of the results can be the echogenic distribution of patients in the on-pump and off-pump groups. Also, most participants in our study and similar studies were aged over 50 years, and most of them were males. Although men were more than women in our study and other studies (
6,
14), this difference was not significant. In another study performed by Machado et al. (
19), a significant difference was found between the age and gender of patients. In their study, the age distribution was in the excess range. Also, the sample size was greater in that study than in our study that can be a probable reason for the significant difference between the two groups of the study.
In the comparison of on-pump and off-pump CABG groups for cardiovascular risk factors, only significant differences were observed in hypertension and dyslipidemia; the same results were seen in other studies (
6,
14). However, in another study (
5), patients had no significant difference in cardiovascular risk factors, especially hypertension (P = 0.44) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.45). In our study, the between-group comparison revealed insignificant differences in metabolic syndrome. Although in the diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome, other cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia were seen and also these factors in our study had significant differences, separately, it is probable that by increasing the sample size of the study and precise evaluation of the effect of these factors in AKI incidence in patients undergoing CABG in the two different methods, different results would be obtained.
In this study, there were no significant differences in the NYHA class between the groups of study. This result is contrary to the findings by Jyrala et al. (
20) that showed a significant difference between the on-pump and off-pump CABG groups in the NYHA class (P < 0.001). One of the most important reasons for these different results can be different criteria for the inclusion of patients to the study. That study used only patients with mild renal dysfunction before surgery. The presence of kidney dysfunction in all stages can be effective in cardiac function, and the cardiac function is diminished by the progression of renal dysfunction (
21). The results of a similar study showed an insignificant difference (P = 0.080) in the NYHA class between the groups of CABG surgery (
6). The sample size and distribution of patients in that study were similar to the inclusion criteria used in our study.
The findings of our study showed that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had no significant difference between the on-pump and off-pump CABG groups. This result is parallel with the findings of other studies (
3,
6,
18). The similarity of our result and those studies can be due to the evaluation of all patients with reduced ejection fraction before surgery. However, in another study (
20), a significant difference was seen between the groups of surgery in LVEF (P = 0.001). This contradiction may be due to the evaluation of LVEF patients before all types of cardiac surgery, including CABG, heart valve surgery, etc. via CPB while in our study, only patients undergoing CABG were enrolled in two different methods (on-pump and off-pump).
The results of our study showed the lack of a significant difference in the type of occluded coronary artery, the number of involved vessels, and the number of grafts between the on-pump versus off-pump groups. Zakkar et al. study (
22) also showed parallel findings with our study. Likewise, Houlind et al. (
6) evaluated patients for one-vessel, two-vessel, and three-vessel diseases of coronary arteries in on-pump and off-pump CABG, and showed no differences between them.
Nowadays, an increasing interest has been created in the prediction of mortality and adverse complications after cardiac surgery. Therefore, many models have been developed to predict these events (
23). One of these applied models is the EuroSCORE II questionnaire that has a predictive value to determine early mortality after cardiac surgery (
24,
25). In the comparison of the two groups for EuroSCORE II, we observed no significant difference, which is compatible with Jamaati et al. (
23) and Atashi et al. (
25) studies. On the other hand, there was a significant difference between the on-pump and off-pump groups in EuroSCORE (
22). These contrary results may be due to the fragile ability of this measurement in Iranian patients. Thus, it is crucial to indigenize and calibrate this scale for use in Iranian people.
One of the most important results of our study was the significant difference between the two groups in the hematocrit level, as the hematocrit level between two groups before and after the study. Also, in the examination of the relationship between hematocrit level and AKI incidence, we observed a significant relationship between different stages of AKI and the hematocrit level before and after the study (P = 0.02). This correlation shows that patients in the two study groups experienced a higher severity of AKI by a decrease in the hematocrit level. This principle finding is monitoring in the patients during CPB, while the minimum level of hematocrit during bypass considered overt than 25% (
26). Since now, no study has evaluated the relationship between hematocrit before and after on-pump and off-pump CABG. Also, there is no report on the relationship between hematocrit before and after CABG and the AKI incidence and its modality, and thus this is one of the rare results of our study.
In our study, there was no relationship between the body mass index and body surface area. Other studies (
5,
14) showed the same results, as well. However, in some other studies (
8,
16,
19,
27). The reason for this discrepancy may be the examination of patients with the same race in our study. Sajja et al. study (
16) showed that European and African races had a higher body surface area and a higher probability of AKI incidence. It is suggested that future studies evaluate the effect of BSA and BMI on the incidence of AKI in all types of cardiac surgeries in Iranian people.
Most of the patients that participated in our study were affected by peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which had no significant difference between the on-pump and off-pump groups. This finding is part of the unique findings of this study. Although our findings did not show a significant difference between the groups, we observed that according to the KDIGO criteria, patients with a high degree of PAD based on the Rutherford classification system had a high incidence of AKI.
The results of our investigation in terms of the use or non-use of blood products during surgery showed no significant difference between the groups. In another study performed on 1,175 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the findings showed that AKI in different stages occurred following the use of red blood and other blood products (
28). Nevertheless, Amouzeshi et al. (
18) showed no significant difference in the AKI incidence between the on-pump or off-pump CABG methods, which is consistent with our results. One of the reasons for the lack of a statistical relationship can be the maintenance of the hematocrit level during surgery with red blood cell administration. The decreased level of hematocrit after cardiac surgery can lead to AKI incidence. On the other hand, Kindzelski et al. (
28) showed that the administration of red blood cells during surgery over three units could subsequently lead to the progressive AKI incidence. Thus, it is suggested that the hematocrit level of patients be managed during surgery with the least use of blood products to prevent the risk of AKI.
The measurement of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an inflammatory factor and the predictor of organ injury incidence is suggested in patients with coronary artery disease (
29). In this study, there was no relationship between AKI and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the on-pump and off-pump groups. However, other studies showed a significant relationship between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the predictive role in organ failure (
30-
33).
In our study, we investigated the difference in arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters between the two groups of on-pump and off-pump. However, bicarbonate and lactate were the only parameters that had significant differences between the two groups. Since now, no study has considered the difference in ABG during surgery between on-pump and off-pump CABG. Similar studies (
7,
34-
36) only examined ABG after surgery. This is while we can better manage patients during surgery with the clinical evidence of ABG to avoid post-surgery complications such as AKI.
In the evaluation of ICU stay, there was a significant difference between the on-pump and off-pump CABG groups. These findings showed a higher hospitalization rate of patients undergoing on-pump CABG than that of the other group. Similar studies (
6,
7) showed that the ICU stay was significantly lower after off-pump CABG than on-pump CABG. These findings revealed the superiority of the off-pump method in CABG over the conventional method. In another study, the use of off-pump CABG decreased the ICU stay and reduced the health care costs. Moreover, the rate of ICU stays increases with the increase of AKI incidence in CABG patients (
37). Therefore, we should use proper treatment and the best surgical method to reduce the severity of AKI in CABG and subsequently reduce the ICU stay.
In our investigation, the time of weaning from mechanical ventilation had a significant difference between on-pump and off-pump CABG. This finding is similar to other studies (
30,
31) that showed the time of weaning was significantly lower in the off-pump group than in the on-pump group. However, in another study (
20), no difference was found between the two groups in the time of weaning. Among the main reasons for the difference in the findings of these studies, we can point out the type of patients in the two groups; in studies that found significant differences between the two groups, patients were given vasoactive agent treatment after surgery. This can confirm that these patients had LCOS, which is similar to the criteria for inclusion in our study.
In our investigation, there were no significant differences in the CPB use and aortic cross-clamp time between the groups of study, which is parallel with the finding of similar studies (
6,
18). However, the time of surgery in the off-pump group of our study had a significant relationship with the AKI incidence, as these patients had a lower grade of AKI with a lower time of surgery. This was a unique finding of this study. One of the most different results of this study is the lack of measurement of grades of AKI and the time of off-pump CABG, separately.
The final rare findings of our study were statistically significant differences between the urinary output volume at six, 12, and 24 h after CABG in the on-pump and off-pump surgery groups. Since now, no studies have reported the same finding. Similar studies (
38,
39) have only evaluated the urinary output volume during CABG. The findings of these studies showed the prognostic role of the urinary output during surgery in the AKI incidence after surgery. On the other hand, Gravlee et al. (
26) showed contrary results implying that the urinary output volume during surgery had no relationship with the incidence of AKI and kidney protection rate. Thus, it is suggested that the urinary output volume be examined after CABG as a clinical outcome of the patients because this factor may reflect the kidney function within 24 h after CABG.
This study had some limitations, such as the lack of urinary output calculation as mL/kg among patients and the probability of variable race in the population study. Other studies would be helpful to resolve the limitations of this study to obtain better instructions for managing the patients with LCOS after CABG.
5.1. Conclusions
The development of AKI after CABG, based on the KDIGO criteria, was correlated with the method of CABG surgery. Thus, to prevent the AKI incidence in patients after CABG, especially on-pump CABG, it is proposed to identify patients with the probability of LCOS after cardiac surgery in the preoperative period to receive special attention.