Sensitivity and Specificity of Colorectal Cancer Mass Screening Methods: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Authors

Zahra Allameh1,*, M Davari2, MH Emami3
1Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3Dept. of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Zahra Allameh, Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Tel: +98-3112736097, E-mail: Email: [email protected]

International Journal of Cancer Management:Vol. 4, issue 2; e80736
Published online:Jun 30, 2011
Article type:Systematic Review
Received:Dec 08, 2010
Accepted:Mar 25, 2011
How to Cite:Allameh Z, Davari M, Emami M. Sensitivity and Specificity of Colorectal Cancer Mass Screening Methods: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Cancer Manag. 2011;4(2):e80736. doi:

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the second cause of the cancer related mortalities in the world. Screening can effectively reduce the mortality and morbidity rate of this cancer. Sensitivity and specificity of screening methods play an important role in their efficacy. The aim of this study is to review sensitivity and specificity of selected colorectal cancer screening methods systematically.

Methods: This study conducted a systematic review of sensitivity and specificity of five common colorectal cancer screening methods. The sites Pubmed, Cochrane library and the center for review and dissemination (CRD database) were searched systematically in Jan 2009. Key questions for this search were focused on the sensitivity and specificity of the 5 screening methods.

Results: In these databases 2713 articles were matched well with our subject. Of these 130 articles were selected with specified inclusion-exclusion criteria. The mean ± standard deviation per patient sensitivities of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, double contrast barium enema, CT colonography and fecal occult blood test for detecting colorectal cancer were respectively 94.7 ± 4.6 %, 82.0± 9.3%, 82.3 ± 8.7 % , 95.7 ±5.9% and 45.7 ± 26.5% . Specificities of these tests were respectively 99.8 ± 0.2%, 83.9%, 92.4 ± 14.7%, 98.5 ± 1.3% and 87.6 ± 11.4%.

Conclusions: Based on available evidences, colonoscopy has the highest sensitivity and specificity among the selected screening methods and fecal occult blood test has the lowest sensitivity. Almost all of the tests except stool exams have acceptable sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal cancer.

Highlights

Fulltext

The Full text is available in PDF.

Copyright

© 2011, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

3
May
2021
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Molecular Screening to Identify Lynch Syndrome in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Molecular Screening to Identify Lynch Syndrome in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Hananeh Azardoost,
Farimah Rahimi,
Mehrdad Zeinalian,
Reza Rezayatmand

Azardoost H, Rahimi F, Zeinalian M, Rezayatmand R. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Molecular Screening to Identify Lynch Syndrome in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Int J Cancer Manag. 2021;14(4):e108198. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm.108198

7
Jan
2016

Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions

Cigdem Devir,
Mahmut Kebapci,
Tuncer Temel,
Aysegul Ozakyol

Devir C, Kebapci M, Temel T, Ozakyol A. Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions. I J Radiol. 2016;13(1):e19518. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.19518

26
Apr
2026
Screening and Management Strategies for Chronic Diseases in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review

Screening and Management Strategies for Chronic Diseases in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review

Ehsan Moradi-Joo,
Seyed Mohammad Salehi Behbahani,
Maryam Ebrahimi Lagha,
Esmail Mousavi Asl,
Siamak Baghaei,
Yousef Shaabani Mahmoudabad
,et al.

Moradi-Joo E, Salehi Behbahani SM, Ebrahimi Lagha M, Mousavi Asl E, Baghaei S, et al. Screening and Management Strategies for Chronic Diseases in High-Risk Populations: A Systematic Review. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care. 2026;15(2):e167826. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-167826

2
Jun
2022

Application of health belief model to identify predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention

Davood Mehrabi

Mehrabi D. Application of health belief model to identify predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention. koomesh. 2022;24(1):e154087. doi:

26
Jul
2021
Participation Rate, Risk Factors, and Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in the Screening Program Among the Population Covered by the Health Centers in Arak, Iran

Participation Rate, Risk Factors, and Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in the Screening Program Among the Population Covered by the Health Centers in Arak, Iran

Pegah Mohaghegh,
Farzane Ahmadi,
Mahjabin Shiravandi,
Javad Nazari

Mohaghegh P, Ahmadi F, Shiravandi M, Nazari J. Participation Rate, Risk Factors, and Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in the Screening Program Among the Population Covered by the Health Centers in Arak, Iran. Int J Cancer Manag. 2021;14(7):e113278. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm.113278

More by these authors

Zahra AllamehPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics