Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
Peer-reviewed Medical Quarterly
Outline
Estimation of Gestational Age Using Ultrasound Scan
Authors
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate estimation of gestational age (GA) early in pregnancy is necessary for obstetric care decisions and for determining fetal growth and other conditions that may need intervention or delivery. This study was aimed to compare menstrual versus ultrasound scan-based gestational age estimates of GA in Kermanshsh during 2004-2005.
Materials and Methods: A diagnostic study was done on 15 to 40 weeks pregnant women with reliable and regular menstrual period who referred to Motazedi Hospital of Kermanshah. At first GA history based on last menstrual period (LMP) was recorded by a Radiologist. Then another Radiologist estimated GA based on Transverse Cerebella Diameter (TCD), Biparietal Diameter (PD) and Femur Length using ultrasound scan. The data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics.
Results: The results showed that mothers age were between 17 to 40 years old. 48.7%of subjects were primi-gravida and 7.5% were five and over multi-gravida. GA results were 29.11
5.4, 28.93
5.3, 29.31
5.4 and 29.38
5.4 weeks based on TCD, BD, FL and LMP measurements respectively. The sensitivity of FL was more than other methods (86.9%) and Kappa coefficient agreement was 0.976.
Conclusion: This study confirmed that using femur length method in clinical ultrasound scan has more sensitivity and it is better to use for estimating GA. Further study of standardization of femur length in Iranian fetus is highly recommended.
Highlights
References
- 1.The References of this article is available on PDF.
Copyright
© 2007, Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Comparison of Gestational Age Based on BPD and FL in Standard of of HADLOCK and OSAKA with Real Gestational Age Based on LMP in Teaching Hospitals in Zahedan
Beiknejad A. Comparison of Gestational Age Based on BPD and FL in Standard of of HADLOCK and OSAKA with Real Gestational Age Based on LMP in Teaching Hospitals in Zahedan. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e48042. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48042
Correlation Between Fetal Anterior-Posterior Thigh Diameters and Routine Ultrasound Parameters in Determining Gestational Age
Farshchian N, Naleini F, Bahrami Kamangar P. Correlation Between Fetal Anterior-Posterior Thigh Diameters and Routine Ultrasound Parameters in Determining Gestational Age. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2019;23(3):e92690. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums.92690
Estimation of Gestational Age According to Crown-Rump Length in Nepalese Population: A Comparison with Previously Published Nomograms
Raj Joshi B. Estimation of Gestational Age According to Crown-Rump Length in Nepalese Population: A Comparison with Previously Published Nomograms . I J Radiol. 2009;6(3):e78991. doi:
Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Fetal Gender Determination in 11 to 14 Week of Gestational Age
Behzad Mehr R, Rezaie Keikhaie K, Behzad Mehr R. Accuracy of Ultrasonography in Fetal Gender Determination in 11 to 14 Week of Gestational Age. Gene Cell Tissue. 2021;8(1):e95381. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/gct.95381
Evaluating the Prevalence of Small for Gestational Age and Its Associated Risk Factors
Barati M, Moramezi F, Moramezi H, Shirzadi N, Shirzadi P. Evaluating the Prevalence of Small for Gestational Age and Its Associated Risk Factors. Jentashapir J Cell Mol Biol. 2016;7(3):e36171. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/jjhr.36171
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 3 days ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 3 days ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 2
Last Update: 3 days ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 6 days ago