Expression of Concern for "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial" [Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(2):e112592]

Author(s):
Mahmood-Reza AlebouyehMahmood-Reza AlebouyehMahmood-Reza Alebouyeh ORCID1,*
1Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine:Vol. 13, issue 6; e144495
Published online:Jan 20, 2024
Article type:Expressions of Concern
Received:Dec 27, 2023
Accepted:Jan 20, 2024
How to Cite:Alebouyeh M. Expression of Concern for "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial" [Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(2):e112592]. Anesth Pain Med. 2024;13(6):e144495. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-144495

The Editor-in-Chief of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine is issuing this Expression of Concern regarding the article titled "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial" by Taheri et al., published in Anesthesia and Pain Medicine in 2021 (1).
This Expression of Concern has been prompted by the receipt of an anonymous communication raising concerns about the description of the shock wave therapy device used in the study. Specifically, the concern points to a discrepancy between the mentioned device in the article, the Dornier AR2, and the device name, the Duolith SD1, both of which are associated with focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (fESWT). The anonymous correspondent has noted that these are two distinct devices, and the lack of clarity on which device was actually used in the study raises questions about the reproducibility of the research.
The accuracy and transparency of device descriptions in scientific research are essential for ensuring the replicability of studies by other researchers. Given the identified discrepancy and the importance of specifying the exact device used in fESWT research, we are taking this Expression of Concern seriously.
Until this matter is resolved, this Expression of Concern will remain attached to the article, ensuring that readers are aware of the concern raised and that the issue is being investigated with diligence and transparency.

References

  • 1.
    Taheri P, Naderi M, Khosravi S. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2021;11(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.112592.

Similar Articles

31
Dec
2011

Using Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Pain

Farnad Imani

Imani F. Using Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Pain. Anesth Pain Med. 2011;1(3):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.22287523.4047

1
May
2021

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Parisa Taheri,
Marzie Naderi,
Saeid Khosravi

Taheri P, Naderi M, Khosravi S. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(2):e112592. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.112592

21
Apr
2012

Interventional Pain Management According to Evidence-Based Medicine

Farnad Imani,
Poupak Rahimzadeh

Imani F, Rahimzadeh P. Interventional Pain Management According to Evidence-Based Medicine. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;1(4):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.4514

31
Oct
2007

A 34 Years Old Woman Referred with Intractable Neck Pain

Naser Sharafaddinzadeh,
Ali Moghtaderi,
Roya Alavi Naini

Sharafaddinzadeh N, Moghtaderi A, Alavi Naini R. A 34 Years Old Woman Referred with Intractable Neck Pain. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2007;2(4):. doi:

24
May
2026
J Cell Mol Anesth

Expression of Concern for Magnesium Gargle versus Ketamine Gargle in Postoperative Sore Throat Pain; A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial [J Cell Mol Anesth. 2020;5(3):e149598]

Ali Dabbagh

Dabbagh A. Expression of Concern for Magnesium Gargle versus Ketamine Gargle in Postoperative Sore Throat Pain; A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial [J Cell Mol Anesth. 2020;5(3):e149598]. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2026;11(2):e172215. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jcma-172215


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCCÂ