Cover image of the article: Epidural Tramadol, is it a Good Option for Cesarean Section?

Image Credit:Anesth Pain Med

Epidural Tramadol, is it a Good Option for Cesarean Section?

Authors

Luciana de Souza Cota Carvalho1,*
1Unifenas University of Medical Sciences, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Luciana de Souza Cota Carvalho, Unifenas University of Medical Sciences, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Tel: +55-3188217852, Fax: +55-3132841208, E-mail: Email: lulucota@yahoo.com

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine:Vol. 1, issue 2; 111-112
Published online:Sep 26, 2011
Article type:Letter
Received:Aug 16, 2011
Accepted:Aug 23, 2011
How to Cite:Carvalho LDSC. Epidural Tramadol, is it a Good Option for Cesarean Section?. Anesth Pain Med. 2011;1(2):111-112. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.22287523.2105

Dear Editor,
I read the article entitled “The Maternal and Neonatal Effects of Adding Tramadol to 2% Lidocaine in Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section” (1). The authors demonstrated that tramadol 50 mg or 100 mg associated to lidocaine is appropriate for this surgery and also improve sensory and motor blockade effects without any increase in complications. However some important reflections and some missing data may be consider for full understanding of the article. For instance, one question came to my mind during the analysis-why haven’t the article focused on tramadol applied on spinal anesthesia? Neuraxial anesthesia is undoubtedly the most appropriate technique for elective cesarean delivery since the relative risk of mortality from general versus regional anesthesia is 16. 7 (2). General anesthesia in obstetric patients is a procedure with higher rates of serious and life-threatening complications, mainly related to airway management once the physiologic changes of pregnancy determine higher incidence of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents and difficult airway (3,4). Until 1980, epidural anesthesia was the primary choice of neuraxial technique for cesarean delivery because spinal anesthesia was associated with a high risk of postdural puncture headache. After this period, the introduction of pencil-point spinal needles and several other advantages, the single-shot spinal anesthesia became the technique of choice for cesarean (5, 6). Besides that, tramadol intrathecal have been used with success for labor and major gynecological surgeries (7, 8).
Other important comments when reflecting about the results section, I was wondering the following points could have been provided to allow fully result analysis:
  1. The mean dose of lidocaine and sufentanil request intraoperative were presented, but it was not showed the number of patients that demanded complementation analgesia and when;
  2. Around 30% of patients present some complications but they did not mention what kind of complications and these numbers is relatively bigger than other found on literature (9) and
  3. They also comment that general anesthesia is an option when maternal apnea lasts longer than 20 seconds or enable to speech or if the mother lost consciousness or did not respond to stimuli but they did not comment if some patients need it, considering the risks of general anesthesia, it is an important date.
Finally, the article core idea is very interesting, since epidural tramadol has comparable analgesic efficacy with lower side effects than epidural morphine, specifically concerning about respiratory depression (10). Although, this article still demands further improvements.

Footnotes

  • Please cite this paper as:Carvalho LSC. Epidural Tramadol, is it a Good Option for Cesarean Section? Anesth Pain. 2011;1(2): 111-2. DOI: 10.5812/kowsar.22287523.2105

  • Financial Disclosure:None declared.

References

  • 1.
    Imani F, Entezary SR, Alebouyeh MR, Parhizgar S. The maternal and neonatal effects of adding tramadol to 2% lidocaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Pain. 2011;1(1):25-9. https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.22287523.1271.
  • 2.
    Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990. Anesthesiology. 1997;86(2):277-84. [PubMed ID: 9054245].
  • 3.
    Stamer U, Wulf H. Complications of obstetric anaesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001;14(3):317-22. [PubMed ID: 17019109].
  • 4.
    Goldszmidt E. Principles and practices of obstetric airway management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26(1):109-25, vii. [PubMed ID: 18319183]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2007.12.004.
  • 5.
    Halpern S, Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(6):1376-83. [PubMed ID: 7992906].
  • 6.
    Riley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, Desai JB, Ratner EF. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(4):709-12. [PubMed ID: 7893022].
  • 7.
    Frikha N, Ellachtar M, Mebazaa MS, Ben Ammar MS. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor--comparison of sufentanil vs tramadol. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2007;19(1):87-96. [PubMed ID: 17511185].
  • 8.
    Chakraborty S, Chakrabarti J, Bhattacharya D. Intrathecal tramadol added to bupivacaine as spinal anesthetic increases analgesic effect of the spinal blockade after major gynecological surgeries. Indian J Pharmacol. 2008;40(4):180-2. [PubMed ID: 20040953]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.43166.
  • 9.
    Chau-in W, Hintong T, Rodanant O, Lekprasert V, Punjasawadwong Y, Charuluxananan S, et al. Anesthesia-related complications of caesarean delivery in Thailand: 16,697 cases from the Thai Anaesthesia Incidents Study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93(11):1274-83. [PubMed ID: 21114206].
  • 10.
    Demiraran Y, Kocaman B, Akman RY. A comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(4):510-3. [PubMed ID: 16100237]. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aei214.

Copyright

Copyright © 2011, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

1
Jul
2011
The maternal and neonatal effects of adding tramadol to 2% lidocaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section

The maternal and neonatal effects of adding tramadol to 2% lidocaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section

Farnad Imani,
Saeid Reza Entezary,
Mahmoud Reza Alebouyeh,
Suzan Parhizgar

Imani F, Entezary SR, Alebouyeh MR, Parhizgar S. The maternal and neonatal effects of adding tramadol to 2% lidocaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med. 2011;1(1):25-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.22287523.1271

1
Jan
2013
Minimum Appropriate Dose of Lidocaine with a Fixed Dose of Sufentanil Epinephrine Used for Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarian Section

Minimum Appropriate Dose of Lidocaine with a Fixed Dose of Sufentanil Epinephrine Used for Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarian Section

Parisa Golfam,
Mitra Yari,
Hamid Reza Bakhtiyari

Golfam P, Yari M, Bakhtiyari HR. Minimum Appropriate Dose of Lidocaine with a Fixed Dose of Sufentanil Epinephrine Used for Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarian Section. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;2(3):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.7810

1
Mar
2021
Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial

Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial

Farnad Imani,
Sarah Lotfi,
Javad Aminisaman,
Afshar Shahmohamadi,
Abbas Ahmadi

Imani F, Lotfi S, Aminisaman J, Shahmohamadi A, Ahmadi A. Comparison of Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia for Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Double Blinded Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(1):e108335. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.108335

7
Feb
2014
Addition of Intrathecal Fentanyl or Meperidine to Lidocaine and Epinephrine for Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery

Addition of Intrathecal Fentanyl or Meperidine to Lidocaine and Epinephrine for Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery

Farnoush Farzi,
Ali Mirmansouri,
Kambiz Forghanparast,
Abtin Heydarzadeh,
Mehrsima Abdollahzadeh,
Fatemeh Jahanyar Moghadam

Farzi F, Mirmansouri A, Forghanparast K, Heydarzadeh A, Abdollahzadeh M, et al. Addition of Intrathecal Fentanyl or Meperidine to Lidocaine and Epinephrine for Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(1):e14081. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.14081

18
Nov
2024
Comparing Analgesic Efficacy: Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone vs. Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine After Cesarean Section Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (2020 - 2021)

Comparing Analgesic Efficacy: Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone vs. Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine After Cesarean Section Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (2020 - 2021)

Mohammadreza Jamshidi,
Mona Ghaderi,
Mitra Hojatansari

Jamshidi M, Ghaderi M, Hojatansari M. Comparing Analgesic Efficacy: Ropivacaine with Dexamethasone vs. Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine After Cesarean Section Using Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (2020 - 2021). Anesth Pain Med. 2024;14(5):e147872. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-147872

More by these authors

Luciana de Souza Cota CarvalhoPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics