Image Credit:Ann Mil Health Sci Res
Outline
Patient controlled analgesia versus conventional analgesia for postoperative pain
Authors
Abstract
Materials and Methods: In a clinical trial the PCA group received self-administered intermittent intravenous morphine via PCA and the conventional group received intravenous Pethidine every 6 hours per day. The patients were assessed on an hourly basis for the first 4 hours after surgery, every 2 hours for the next 8 hours and every 4 hours for next 12 hours. Two methods were used in order to evaluate the degree of pain relief in patients: (1) facial pain scale; pain assessment based on the patient’s appearance and (2) numerical rating scale; based on patient ratings of their pain.
Results: Forty eight patients (79.1% female, 20.1% male) with a mean age of 45.7 ± 10.7 years old were enrolled into the study. During the first 24 hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, pain intensity based on facial pain scale was lower in the PCA group. However, the difference was significant only in the second hour (mean pain score in PCA group: 2.9, mean pain score in conventional group: 3.7, P = .007). Also, the mean pain scores based on numerical rating scale were significantly lower in PCA group except for the first hour. Although it was not significantly lower than conventional group (mean pain score in PCA group: 4.2, mean pain score in conventional group: 4.6, P = .45).
Conclusion: Intravenous PCA resulted in better postoperative pain reduction compared to intermittent bolus opioid delivery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Highlights
References
- 1.references is available in PDF.
Copyright
© 2014, Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
The Effect of Patient-controlled Analgesia on Intensity of Postoperative Pain in Abdominal Surgeries
Shariati A, Aghamollaee M, Fayazi S, Gheibizadeh M. The Effect of Patient-controlled Analgesia on Intensity of Postoperative Pain in Abdominal Surgeries. Jentashapir J Cell Mol Biol. 2014;5(5):e23227. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/jjhr-23227
Intravenous Paracetamol for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Gousheh SM, Nesioonpour S, Javaher foroosh F, Akhondzadeh R, Sahafi SA, et al. Intravenous Paracetamol for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Anesth Pain Med. 2013;3(1):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.9880
Intravenous Patient-Controlled Remifentanil Versus Paracetamol in Post-Operative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Jahangiri Fard A, Babaee T, Alavi SM, Nasiri AA, Ghoreishi SMM, et al. Intravenous Patient-Controlled Remifentanil Versus Paracetamol in Post-Operative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2014;4(5):e19862. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.19862
Comparison of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine and Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Arabzadeh A, Seyedsadeghi M, Sadeghi N, Nejati K, Mohammadian Erdi A. Comparison of Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine and Intravenous Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(6):e114623. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.114623
A Comparison of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia With Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Major Gynecologic Oncologic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Moslemi F, Rasooli S, Baybordi A, Golzari SE. A Comparison of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia With Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Major Gynecologic Oncologic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(5):e29540. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.29540
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 1 week ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 1 week ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 1 week ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 4 hours ago
- OpenAlex: 0
Last Update: 8 hours ago
- OpenCitations: 0
Last Update: 5 days ago