In this study, 419 children with acute gastroenteritis were examined for infection with
Campylobacter strains, and
Campylobacter was the cause of diarrhea in 8.6% of the participants. Several Iranian studies have obtained different values than those reported in our study. Feizabadi et al. (
17) investigated 500 Tehrani children with acute diarrhea, and the frequency of
Campylobacter strains in their stool cultures was reported to be 8%; over 85% of these were
Campylobacter jejuni. According to Alborzi et al.’s study (
18) of 719 Iranian children to investigate the etiology of acute gastroenteritis in Shiraz, 2% of the cases of acute diarrhea in children were caused by
Campylobacter strains. Dallal identified a frequency of 0.9% for
Campylobacter strains in acute diarrhea among children younger than 5 years of age in south Tehran (
19). Various studies have reported
Campylobacter frequencies, such as 3.0% in Senegal, 8.4% in Uruguay, 9.6% in Egypt, 9.7% in Tanzania, 9.3% in Uganda, 10.5% in Romania, 11.0% in Sudan, 12.7% in Ethiopia, and 22.6% in Ghana (
11,
12,
15,
20-
25). Therefore, the average contribution of
Campylobacter strains to AGE in children was about 9% in most studies. The significant differences observed in some studies necessitate epidemiological examinations in different regions to better understand the etiological status of acute diarrhea in children.
This study found that 47.5% of cases of diarrhea caused by
Campylobacter occurred in children aged 6 - 12 years and there is a relationship between age group and infection with AGE caused by
Campylobacter. Relevant studies have shown inconsistent results. According to a study conducted in Shiraz, children over the age of 11 years had the highest incidence of
Campylobacter (
26). In contrast, Rathaur et al. (
27) found that the age group from 1 - 3 years made up 52.9% of patients with
Campylobacter diarrhea. Children from 2 - 5 years of age had the highest risk of diarrhea caused by
Campylobacter in a Ghanaian study (26). In addition, a Polish study of all cases of
Campylobacteriosis diagnosed in 2012 revealed that over 79% of patients were younger than 4 years (
28), while German children aged 1 - 4 years constituted the majority of patients in a 10-year study of
Campylobacteriosis (
29). A review of the studies that included a wide (statistical) population indicated that most
Campylobacter infections occur from the ages of 1 - 5 years. A meta-analysis should make the situation clearer.
In this study, fever, abdominal pain, leukocytosis, and WBCs in the stool were associated with diarrhea caused by
Campylobacter. Different results have been found in the few existing relevant studies. One report on children under 5 years merely noted a relationship between the frequency of
Campylobacter and abdominal pain (
30); the frequency of fever, vomiting, and dehydration in another study was similar in several different types of diarrhea caused by bacterial pathogens (
27). A comparison between children with
Campylobacter diarrhea and those with diarrhea caused by
Salmonella showed a relationship between
Campylobacter and abdominal pain and leukocytosis; four criteria have been recommended for the differentiation of
Campylobacter diarrhea: age over 5 years, leukocytosis, abdominal pain, and diarrhea (
31). Based on the evidence and results of this study, abdominal pain is a common clinical symptom in patients with
Campylobacter, but other clinical and laboratory findings are not reliable enough; the epidemiological situation and clinical and laboratory symptoms must therefore be considered for the diagnosis of AGE caused by
Campylobacter. Further studies will be required to develop reliable diagnostic criteria.
This study is one of the few that has included a wide population; it also attempted to use the most precise equipment to measure the clinical, bacteriological, and laboratory variables to evaluate the clinical and laboratory symptoms of AGE caused by Campylobacter in children. There were some limitations to the study as follows. Campylobacter strains cannot be determined exactly, and differences in the development of symptoms in various strains may disrupt the careful examination of the study variables. Therefore, future studies should consider the role of different strains in developing clinical and laboratory symptoms.