Burn patients are at risk not only for wound infections, but also for other clinical complications due to a debilitated immunologic status. Clinical specimens may be obtained from various sites and sources of infection. Bloodstream infections and the subsequent development of sepsis are among the most common infection complications that occur following thermal injuries. These patients may also develop urinary tract infections associated with prolonged bladder catheterization (
1,
2,
23,
24). Emerging antimicrobial resistance trends in bacterial pathogens represent a serious therapeutic challenge for the clinicians who care for these patients (
25).
In the present study,
E. coli was the predominant urinary tract pathogen and
K. pneumoniae was an important wound pathogen. Mokaddas et al. (
26) reported that burn patients are at high risk for nosocomial infections due to MDR bacteria, a large proportion of which are Gram-negative. The report from a 6-year review of bacteria identification and antibiotic susceptibility records at the US Army institute of surgical research burn center stressed the shifting epidemiology of bacterial isolates recovered during extended hospitalizations, and revealed that the bacteriology of burns begins with Gram-positive organisms or enteric bacteria (
27).
The widespread use of β-lactam antibiotics to treat human infections may be associated with the selection of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates of
Enterobacteriaceae (
28). During the last few decades, resistance of Gram-negative bacilli to cephalosporin antibiotics has accelerated due to the appearance of ESBLs in
Klebsiella,
E. coli, and Proteus mirabilis. Thus, most clinicians have relied on imipenem, ciprofloxacin, or amikacin for the effective treatment of serious infections due to MDR
Klebsiella (
29).
The present study observed that 88.8% of
K. pneumoniae and 57.7% of
E. coli isolates were not susceptible to ceftazidime, the most common cephalosporin used in our hospital setting. Among the β-lactams, more than 80% of
E. coli and
K. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to cefazolin, cefotaxime, cefazolin, and ceftriaxone. Among the non-β-lactams, approximately 96% of
K. pneumoniae were resistant to ciprofloxacin and 84% to ofloxacin, compared to 78% of
E. coli isolates being resistant to ciprofloxacin and 61% to ofloxacin. Another study conducted to compare the susceptibility of ESBL-producing
Enterobacteriaceae isolates with that of non-ESBL-producers found that approximately 40% were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 30% to ciprofloxacin, 30% to gentamicin, and 15% to piperacillin-tazobactam; it was suspected that these high levels of resistance to non-β-lactams were associated with the presence of ESBLs (
30). The occurrence and distribution of ESBLs varies among different species and countries, demonstrating important geographical differences, and clinical specimens even vary between various hospital wards and between inpatients and outpatients. Zaniani and coworkers reported that the prevalences of ESBL-producing
E. coli and
K. pneumoniae isolates were 15.62% and 20%, respectively, in Iran (
31). Research from India identified ESBLs in 70% - 90% of
Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Pakistan, India, and the United Kingdom (
32). Similar frequencies have been reported in many European countries (
33-
35), although published reports from some countries, including France and Canada, reveal a much lower prevalence (10% - 40%) (
36,
37). A study from the United Arab Emirates (
38) reported ESBL production in 39% of
E. coli and 42% of
K. pneumonia isolates. Published research from Turkey showed 12% of
E. coli and 47% of
K. pneumoniae isolates to be ESBL-positive (
39). None of these studies were performed on burn patients.
In Iran, research has focused on ESBL production in
Acinetobacter baumannii and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and lacunae exist in information on the actual prevalence of ESBL-producing
E. coli and
K. pneumoniae isolates from burn patients. Our study is one of the first to investigate these two isolates from burn patients. We found
K. pneumoniae and
E. coli to be ESBL producers at rates of 71.4% and 57.7%, respectively, which is quite high. This was more pronounced by the presence of three ESBL genes,
blaTEM,
blaSHV, and
blaCTX, in these isolates. SHV and TEM ESBLs are derivatives of the narrow-spectrum SHV-1 and TEM-1/2 enzymes, while CTX-M enzymes are named for their strong hydrolytic activity for cefotaxime; they include the CTX-M-9, CTX-M-3, CTX-M-14, and CTX-M-15 families (
40). In the present investigation, approximately 84% of
K. pneumoniae and 92% of
E. coli isolates were resistant to cefotaxime, and 58% and 67% were carriers of
blaCTX-M-15, respectively. The high prevalence of these β-lactamase enzymes suggests a serious problem, and drives a greater reliance on carbapenems.
The present study found class 1 genetic elements to be associated with 36.58% of E. coli isolates that produce ESBLS and with 51.11% of K. pneumoniae isolates harboring ESBL enzymes. Other interesting features were the significant associations between MDR patterns and the presence of class 1 integrons and class 2 genetic elements in few MDR E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates harboring quinolone resistance with the gyr and parC genes. Broad antibiotic resistance extending to multiple antibiotic classes is now a frequent characteristic of ESBL-producing enterobacterial isolates. Interestingly, our study found the majority of K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates to be significantly more resistant to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, leaving no options for treatment other than imipenem or amikacin. The MIC50 and MIC90 values for nalidixic acid for all E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates were found at the resistance breakpoints (both = 163.55 mg/L), whereas for ciprofloxacin, MIC50 and MIC90 was 24.78 mg/L, indicating a major intervention in therapeutic management.
In the present study, the predominant ESBL genotype in
E. coli was
blaCTX-M-3 (67.60%), while
blaSHV was the predominant (80.95%) and significant (P < 0.001) genotype in
K. pneumoniae. Khosravi et al. (
41) found SHV-1 to be the most prevalent ESBL gene, followed by TEM-1. It was also remarkable in our study that three β-lactamase genes were co-expressed in ESBL producers, and the most common combination comprised
blaTEM +
SHV+
CTX and
blaCTX with
blaTEM. DNA sequence analyses of the
blaTEM sequences indicated that these two bacteria harbored the TEM-1b subgroup, whereas the subgroup found in the
blaSHV isolates was SHV-1. In the case of the
blaCTX-M-3 family, these isolates were carriers of the subgroup CTX-M-15. Moosavian and Deiham (
42) studied the distribution of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M genes among ESBL-producing
Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Iran (from patients outside of burn wards), but could not detect isolates carrying CTX-M-type ESBLs.
Hyle et al. (
43) performed a multivariable analysis and found the infecting pathogen (
K. pneumoniae) to be the only independent risk factor for MDR ESBL infections. We did not study the risk factors of ESBL production; however, the most frequent phenotypic pattern of MDR in our study was CAZ-CFM-CTR-CZ-GA-COT, which was found in 54.65% of isolates of ESBL-producing
E. coli and
K. pneumoniae, followed by CAZ-CFM-CTR-CZ-AK-GA-COT and CAZ-CFM-CTR-CZ, each observed in 33.72% of isolates. Our patients most likely acquired their infections through contact with colonized healthcare workers or contaminated fomites, or the isolates emerged as a result of the selective effect of antibiotic use. This is a prospective area that should be considered in the future.
5.1. Conclusions
The higher rate of ESBL production in K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates shows that these are common in our hospital burn unit, with resistance to many classes of antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones, resulting in limited treatment options. MDR was common in E coli and K. pneumoniae isolates expressing ESBLs. In particular, the co-presence of three ESBL genotypes was associated with three- and four-class MDR. The transferable nature of these resistance genes is particularly worrisome and creates a demand for epidemiological studies and for improved infection-control procedures with a better understanding of the means by which spread occurs.