While researchers in developed countries have extensively studied the epidemiology of liver cirrhosis, unfortunately, this subject has received little focus in developing countries, possibly due to the low quality of available data (
6). In this study, we aimed to assess the distribution of risk factors, etiologies, complications, and outcomes associated with cirrhosis among our registered patients.
The investigation of cirrhosis across two time periods revealed a noteworthy reduction in biochemical factors and a decrease in the prevalence of liver diseases during the second period. Data analysis showed that despite vaccination, viral hepatitis remains the most common cause of cirrhosis in both periods, and it was more prevalent among men.
Furthermore, besides the crucial role of vaccination, differences between these periods may be attributed to advancements in disease management and public health measures, where vaccination plays a key role.
Assessing baseline data showed that, despite the higher involvement of older individuals in both groups, the incidence of young people (less than 25 years) was lower in the second group. Initially, studies believed that one of the risk factors for kidney problems, including liver cirrhosis, is age (
13). Studies suggest that cirrhosis is more frequently seen after the age of 50 (
14) and is also more common in men than in women (
8), as reflected in our study data. In this regard, in our study, HBV and HCV were the most common etiologies of cirrhosis, with a higher prevalence among men. This gender disparity may be attributed to a higher frequency of business travel and high-risk behaviors for hepatitis transmission among males compared to females, as supported by previous literature (
15). Moreover, it has been observed that men exhibit lower levels of awareness regarding health issues compared to women. Consequently, cirrhosis tends to occur less frequently in women, owing to their lower prevalence of HBV, HCV, and alcohol consumption.
On the other hand, the immune response to vaccines is higher at a younger age; therefore, even if we assume that vaccine administration across different age groups is the same, which it is not, younger individuals still show a better response to the vaccine. In this context, autoimmune hepatitis causes cirrhosis at younger ages, while other factors such as NAFLD tend to cause cirrhosis at older ages (
14).
In this medical registry-based study, it was observed that biochemical tests showed better results in the second period compared to the first. As we know, elevated levels of liver enzymes such as ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase, along with increased levels of bilirubin and immunoglobulins and lower levels of albumin, are the most important biomarkers in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Our study indicated that in the second group, these factors were significantly reduced in patients with cirrhosis compared to the first group, which could impact their mortality. Other studies in our country share a similar view (
5,
6). One study showed that deaths due to cirrhosis decreased significantly by 2015, which they believe aligns with the period of maximum coverage of hepatitis B vaccination (
6). However, no study has examined the changes in biomarker levels in the years following vaccination compared to the years before, and what we have found in this study opens a window into a new realm of understanding. Nonetheless, the efforts of the Ministry of Health in effectively controlling hepatitis B and striving to meet the WHO global health goals for hepatitis C by 2030, thereby improving liver health in society, should not be overlooked. It is important to note that studies suggest that in cirrhosis patients, the anti-HBs titer is very low, especially after eight months (
16).
Patients with cirrhosis exhibited ascites, esophageal varices, and hepatic encephalopathy as the most prevalent complications. Similarly, prior literature has identified these conditions as major complications of cirrhosis that may impact the quality of life and survival of affected individuals (
17). The prevalence of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy was found to be lower in the second period of our study. As mentioned previously, these improvements may be attributed to enhanced disease management; moreover, with the implementation of more effective guidelines and follow-up procedures, patient recovery and the faster diagnosis of disease complications have improved over the years. Cirrhosis trends have improved worldwide, partly due to the effectiveness of available therapies for the prevention and treatment of HBV and HCV. This is evidenced by the thirty-year decline in liver disease mortality rates worldwide (
4). However, HBV and HCV continue to be major causes of cirrhosis worldwide, particularly in low-income countries (
18).
Our findings also indicate that autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and NAFLD were more prevalent among women. Notably, the prevalence of NAFLD was higher among patients in the second period compared to the first period. Therefore, it is imperative to implement cost-effective strategies for maintaining screening and management of viral hepatitis and achieving early detection and prevention of cirrhosis caused by alcohol-related liver diseases and NAFLD/NASH.
Patients with cirrhosis require long-term treatment, even though liver transplantation may be the sole treatment option (
19). In 2017, cirrhosis resulted in 1.32 million deaths worldwide, with approximately two-thirds occurring in men and one-third in women (
4). In the current investigation, mortality and transplantation rates were comparatively greater among patients who were registered in the first period than those registered during the subsequent period, which can be attributed in part to the relatively longer duration of follow-up in this cohort. Furthermore, the mortality following liver transplantation was significantly lower in the second period, which could be due to improvements in organ preservation and matching, surgical techniques, and the prevention and management of complications.
Our study encountered several limitations. The underreporting of alcohol intake in the present study is likely influenced by cultural and religious considerations, potentially leading to an underestimation of its contribution to the prevalence of cirrhosis. Additionally, the observed differences among patients registered in two distinct periods may be partly attributed to variations in alcohol consumption, which could have increased over time. Moreover, our inclusion of only patients referred to our clinic may constrain the generalizability of our findings. Evaluating these outcomes in alternative centers with diverse age, sex distribution, or cultural attributes could yield disparate results.
5.1. Conclusions
In conclusion, patients registered in the second period exhibited better laboratory and clinical outcomes. Viral hepatitis remains the most common cause of cirrhosis in both periods and was more prevalent among men. The epidemiological characteristics of cirrhosis indicate that targeted intervention policies, such as hepatitis B vaccination, have contributed to reducing the progression of cirrhosis.