One of the most important public health concerns in both developing and developed countries is viral hepatitis. It is highest in developing countries such as those in Asia, Africa, the Pacific Islands, and the Arctic, and lowest in developed countries such as those in North America, Europe, and Australasia (
1). Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is an autoimmune liver disease, which imposes a high economic burden on individuals and the society (
2,
3). It is the most widespread cause of chronic hepatitis across the world. Many of inactive HBV infections would significantly transfer to chronic hepatitis (
4). The annual death rate for chronic HBV infection is 500,000 - 700,000, making it the 10th leading cause of death in the world (
5). Chronic HBV infection can progress to liver failure, cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma in a few decades. Long-term complications of chronic HBV infection can cause about half of all cases of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in the world. The prevalence range of HBV infection is from 1% to 20% in different parts of the world, and Iran is among the countries with mild to moderate infections. This autoimmune liver disease imposes a great socioeconomic burden on individuals and society. Although individual patients suffer greatly from chronic HBV infection, policymakers and budget holders must know if the benefit of prevention and treatment justifies the costs from social perspective. For this purpose, data on the burden of disease are regarded the basis of economic calculations. In 1993, Dean T. Jamison suggested the global burden of disease (GBD) for the first time (
6). Consequently, this methodology was used by the world health organization (WHO) and the Harvard school of public health in order to assess the health of populations.
Several methods have been proposed to quantify population-level burden of disease. The disability adjusted life years (DALYs) is a way to measure population health and is being increasingly used to compare and analyze the burden due to diseases (
7). It is a concept similar to healthy year that includes weights for time spent in less-than-perfect health. DALYs are composed of two components: (1) years of life lost (LLY) due to premature death and (2) years lived with disability (YLD) associated with nonfatal injuries and diseases (
8,
9). To measure the economic burden of hepatitis, a considerable number of studies have been published in literature (
10,
11). Economic burden of hepatitis B virus infection in different stages of disease was evaluated by Zahra Kavosi et al. in 2014. The results showed that the total annual costs per patient for chronic hepatitis B, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma were US$ 3094.5, US$ 17483, and US$ 32958 during 2012, respectively (
12). In another study, the average diagnostic and treatment costs of chronic HBV with respect to different therapeutic strategies in Iran were estimated. The results of this study showed that the total cost of diagnostic services for HBV was US$ 1499.07 and the total costs of treatment varied significantly from US$ 73 to US$ 8256 (
4). Kanwal et al. evaluated the cost-effectiveness of six strategies in HBV cirrhosis. Their results showed that both Entecavir and Adefovir strategies are cost-effective in patients with HBV cirrhosis. Choosing between Adefovir and Entecavir strategies is highly dependent on available budget. In patients with HBV cirrhosis with previous Lamivudine resistance, “Adefovir salvage” appears more effective and less expensive than “Entecavir salvage” (
11).
None of these studies estimated the disability adjusted life years of hepatitis B in Iran. Therefore, it is essential to carry out studies on this subject. The main aim of this study was to estimate population-level burden of disease by calculating the disability adjusted life years.