Chemotherapy is currently the standard treatment for patients with hematological malignancies, and invasive fungal infections are one of the most common adverse complications in this setting (
19). IFIs are mostly prevalent in patients with acute leukemia, especially after induction chemotherapy (
5). In one study on patients with hematological malignancies, the prevalence of IFIs was highest in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and
A. flavus with 44% was the most common cause (
19). In this study with 17 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 15 AML patients, the prevalence of proven IFIs was higher in patients with AML; however, this difference was not statistically significant. In addition, the most common causal agent was
A. flavus. Despite extensive studies, there are still serious controversial topics about the best way to diagnose IFIs, especially when IA is suspected in patients undergoing chemotherapy or BMT (
18). Given the low sensitivity of mycological culture to detect aspergillosis, relying on culture alone is not enough to rule out the infection and even new methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are not superior to cultures for detecting invasive mold infections (
18,
20). IA in the patients with hematologic malignancies usually causes sinopulmonary involvement because their immunocompromised status may provide an opportunity for growing spores and invade sinonasal mucosal tissue. Therefore, sampling from this infected tissue may supply a quick and accessible diagnostic method (
3,
21). One of the important diagnostic specimens in these infections is sinonasal endoscopy, where the existence of pale and necrotic mucosa would be strongly favorable for IFI. Biopsy of the involved areas for pathological and mycological examination could be effective in getting a definitive diagnosis, although in many cases due to coagulation disorders such as severe thrombocytopenia, this procedure cannot be feasible in the acute phase of the disease. For the first time, the nasal lavage method was explained as a diagnostic measure by Hirvonen et al. in 1999 (
15). The nasal lavage technique is a non-invasive procedure, well-tolerated, and easy to perform. In some studies, NALF has been used for the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis and evaluation of the response to topical steroids therapy in non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilia (
16,
22). To the best of our knowledge, the mentioned study is the first study investigating the diagnostic value of NALF in the detection of IFIs, especially IA through its GM assay in patients with leukemia. Samples taken from sterile fluids are much more valuable for the diagnosis of IFIs than those obtained from non-sterile sites that are likely to be colonized (BAL, sinuses, respiratory secretions, and the like) (
18). Finding fungal elements in non-sterile secretions can be contributory for detection of an IFI if there are related predisposing factors along with clinical and/or radiological evidence, but it is not confirmatory (
18). In a study on 58 BAL specimens obtained from hematological malignant patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infections, 29 (50%) mycological cultures were positive, however, fungal hyphae were demonstrated in 23 mycological smears (
10). NALF used in the current study, was a non-sterile and accessible fluid which collected from 32 patients with hematological malignancies, and showed positive mycological smear and culture in 7 (21.8%) patients and 9 (28%) patients, respectively. CT scans and serological testes such as GM assay are being frequently used for diagnosis of invasive sinopulmonary fungal infections, especially IA (
23). There are currently many leukemia centers around the world that apply the imaging modalities especially thoracic CT scan as the first diagnostic tool guiding for anti-fungal treatment initiation, however, considering the poor specificity of lung CT scan to diagnose invasive lung aspergillosis, the result of imaging patterns should be interpreted alongside mycological and serological tests (
10,
24). Many cut-off values have been reported in various studies in order to encourage sufficient sensitivity and specificity of serum GM for IA diagnosis, for example in a study on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients for early detection of IA, the sensitivity and specificity were about 94% and 99%, respectively (
13). Although previous studies showed high sensitivity and specificity of serum GM tests, subsequent prospective studies demonstrated a specificity of 85 - 99% and a wide range of sensitivity of 29 - 94% for GM tests on patients with hematologic malignancies (
17). BAL GM cut-off also is a challenging topic, for instance in a study on hematological malignant patients, using a BAL GM cutoff OD = 1.1 was associated with IPA detection with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity (
8). In another study of patients with hematologic malignancy who were suspected to have IA, the sensitivity of BAL GM assay was 91% (with a cut off OD ≥ 1) and in comparison with the mycological BAL culture which showed 50% sensitivity, BAL GM was a significantly better test (
10). GM levels in fragments of the specimens removed from the sinus endoscopy have also been investigated in immunocompetent patients with fungal rhinosinusitis that the sensitivity and specificity were 87 and 88%, respectively (
25). In a study conducted by Kostamo et al. on GM levels in mucosal sinus specimens and NALF in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, there were 5 (20%) positive samples in the patient and 4 (21%) positive samples in the control group (with cut-off ≤ 1) and it was concluded that NALF GM test is not reliable for the diagnosis of chronic Aspergillus rhinosinusitis (
26). In the current study with NALF GM cut-off ≥ 0.5, a sensitivity of about 78% and specificity of 64% was demonstrated for the diagnosis of IA in the patients with leukemic. The use of piperacillin tazobactam is the only variable that significantly associated with the false positive results of GM (
7). In this study, none of the patients received piperacillin tazobactam. Many centers use anti mold azoles or other antifungal agents as prophylaxis that could affect the results of serum GM level (
14), but none of our patients were taken anti mold prophylaxis. According to the studies, there is no significant relationship between serum GM levels and the extent of lung involvement in aspergillosis (
17). No comparisons were made between radiological evidence and serum or NALF GM in the current study.