In this meta-analysis study, 889 articles were found in the initial search, and 23 articles were included in the meta-analysis stage (
Figure 1 and
Table 1).
The prevalence of LC was 3.7% (95% CI, 2.6 - 5.3) in women and 7.1% (95% CI, 5.7 - 9) in males. (
Figures 2 and
3). Also, the funnel plot diagram is shown in
Figures 4 and
5, and the regression of LC incidence in
Figures 6 and
7.
The prevalence of LC was 3.7% (95% CI, 2.6 - 5.3) in women and 7.1% (95% CI, 5.7 - 9) in males. In the meta-analysis study by Hassanipour et al., which reviewed 14 original articles on the incidence of LC; the incidence rate was 6.33% in men and 2.57% in women (
52). From the difference between this meta-analysis study and Hassanipour et al. study, 14 articles in the group of women and 14 articles in the group of men were included in the meta-analysis study between 1996 and 2010 (
52). In this meta-analysis study, 21 articles for the group of men and 20 articles for the group of women were included in the study.
The incidence rate of LC in men was 7.1%, which was found in 21 reviewed articles between 2021 and 2023. Sun et al. reported an incidence of 50.04 per 100 000 (
53), which was higher than the results of this study. Also, regarding women in the study of DeRouen et al., the incidence of LC among women who had no history of smoking was 13.1%, and among women who smoked was 17.1%, which is much higher than the results of this study (
54).
In this meta-analysis study, the incidence rate of LC was higher in men (7.1%). In the study of Sun et al. in China (
53) and the study of Yang et al. in China and the United States, the incidence rate was 69% in men and 31%in women (
55), which was consistent with the results of this study. On the other hand, in the study of Jemal et al. in the United States and the group born in 1950 in people aged 45 to 49 years, the incidence rate in women was 27% per 100 000, and in men, it was 36.5% per 100 000. In the group born in 1965, the incidence in women was 24.5% per 100 000, and in men, it was 23.1% per 100 000 (
56). One of the reasons for the difference between this meta-analysis study and Jemal et al.'s study is the difference in the risk factors that cause cancer. In Iran, smoking, as one of these risk factors, is less common in women than in men. The prevalence of chronic diseases is increasing and all the efforts of the health and treatment staff are to reduce chronic diseases. For this reason, prevalence studies in the field of chronic diseases are a priority (
57,
58).
Among the strengths of this study, we can mention updating the data related to the occurrence of LC in Iran. By updating the incidence of LC, health policymakers can make the necessary decisions in the field of prevention and early detection of LC.