Azole antifungals, particularly fluconazole, are among the most effective and commonly used agents for treating
C. albicans infections. Fluconazole is widely used because of its therapeutic properties, absorption, and effectiveness against
Candida infections. Resistance to azole antifungals was rare until the 1980s but has increased substantially since 2021. The increasing prevalence of fungal infections has led to greater antifungal use and increased resistance among
Candida species (
7,
9-
12). The prevalence of acute and systemic
Candida infections, antifungal treatment, particularly with azoles, and resistance to these agents underscore the need for susceptibility testing (
8). Determining pathogen susceptibility helps guide treatment and eradicate fungal infections while limiting unnecessary drug use and secondary resistance.
Several genes associated with resistance, including CDR1, CDR2, MDR1, ERG3, ERG6, ERG9, ERG11, RTA2, and NAG2, have been identified in
C. albicans. These genes contribute to antifungal resistance through different molecular mechanisms (
9). In
C. albicans, ERG11 encodes lanosterol 14α-demethylase, the target enzyme of azoles. Fluconazole resistance is associated with increased expression, point mutations, and alterations in ergosterol biosynthesis. ERG11 overexpression increases the abundance of lanosterol 14α-demethylase, promoting ergosterol synthesis and reducing fluconazole effectiveness (
10).
Among the 200 randomly selected participants, 39 had C. albicans infection (19.5%), indicating a high prevalence of mucosal candidiasis in this sample. Disk diffusion identified fluconazole resistance in 27 of the 39 isolates (69.2%). This high proportion of resistance highlights the importance of evaluating more effective therapeutic approaches. Because fluconazole targets lanosterol 14α-demethylase, this study assessed amplification of the transcript encoding this enzyme. Susceptibility testing is an initial step in selecting appropriate treatment for candidiasis and avoiding excessive drug use and the development of resistance. Among the 27 resistant isolates, ERG11 transcripts were detected in 18. These isolates were also classified as fluconazole resistant by disk diffusion. Resistance in 27 of the 39 confirmed C. albicans isolates suggests that multiple factors and genes with different molecular mechanisms may contribute to the resistant phenotype.
The observed resistance proportion was higher than several previously reported estimates from Iranian
C. albicans populations. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Iranian clinical isolates reported substantial variation in antifungal resistance, with pooled estimates generally lower than the proportion observed in this sample (11). Differences in patient populations, anatomical sampling sites, prior antifungal exposure, geographic settings, laboratory methods, and interpretation criteria may contribute to these variations. Previous Iranian studies have also demonstrated geographic and clinical variation in fluconazole susceptibility. Studies of vulvovaginal candidiasis and other clinical
Candida infections have reported different distributions of
C. albicans and non-albicans
Candida species and variable fluconazole resistance (
12). These findings support local surveillance rather than extrapolation of resistance rates between populations.
ERG11 is biologically relevant to azole susceptibility because it encodes lanosterol 14α-demethylase, the enzyme targeted by azole antifungals. However, resistance is not determined by a single gene. ERG11 mutations and regulatory changes can contribute to azole resistance, and efflux-pump systems and their regulatory genes may also play important roles (
7). In this study, conventional endpoint RT-PCR detected ERG11 transcripts in 18 resistant isolates. This finding should not be interpreted as evidence of ERG11 overexpression. An ERG11 amplicon demonstrates detection of the target transcript under the experimental conditions but does not establish transcript abundance relative to that in susceptible isolates. This distinction is particularly important because fluconazole-susceptible
C. albicans isolates also possess and express ERG11.
Quantitative studies have demonstrated variation in ERG11 expression among isolates and shown that increased expression alone does not necessarily correspond to resistance. One recent clinical study found ERG11 upregulation in a substantial proportion of fluconazole-susceptible isolates, emphasizing the multifactorial nature of antifungal resistance (
9). The present findings therefore cannot establish that ERG11 expression caused fluconazole resistance or that transcript detection has diagnostic value for identifying resistant isolates. Such conclusions would require quantitative expression measurements, appropriate susceptible and resistant comparison groups, biological and technical replicates, and statistical analysis of the relationship between expression and phenotype.
A strength of this study is the combination of clinical sampling, phenotypic susceptibility testing, and molecular investigation.
5.1. Study Limitations
Several limitations should be considered. First, the study was conducted at two clinical sites in Zahedan, which may limit generalizability to other populations and geographic regions. Second, the sample size was relatively small, particularly for molecular analysis. Third, conventional endpoint RT-PCR could not quantify ERG11 transcript abundance. Fourth, other important resistance mechanisms, including ERG11 mutations and overexpression of efflux-pump genes such as CDR1, CDR2, and MDR1, were not investigated. Fifth, the absence of complete individual inhibition-zone measurements in the original report limited assessment of the distribution of susceptibility results.
5.2. Conclusions
Recent research supports a broader molecular approach to azole resistance. Alongside ERG11, efflux-pump pathways and regulatory genes such as TAC1 and MRR1 may contribute to resistance (
13). Future studies should therefore combine standardized phenotypic susceptibility testing with quantitative RT-PCR and, where feasible, ERG11 sequencing and assessment of relevant efflux-pump genes. Disk diffusion is inexpensive and allows large numbers of samples to be examined in each experiment; it can be used alongside genotypic methods to investigate resistance and the genes involved. Investigating fluconazole and other antifungal resistance genes in indigenous
C. albicans isolates in Iran can support ongoing surveillance. Further studies in different patient populations and with larger numbers of isolates are recommended to provide a comprehensive assessment of
C. albicans in Iran. Given the prevalence of opportunistic fungal infections and the high resistance proportion observed in this study, simple, cost-effective methods, such as disk diffusion, used alongside molecular analyses can aid in controlling the spread of drug resistance.