The demographic characteristics of the 152 participants are presented in
Table 1. Overall, 54.6% of participants were male, 52.0% were younger than 40 years, and 56.6% were married. Participants had diverse educational backgrounds and occupational statuses.
As shown in
Table 2, the mean score for secure attachment was higher than the mean scores for the avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles. Among the sources of self-knowledge, social comparison had the highest mean score. Pain intensity decreased significantly following physiotherapy. The mean pain intensity score decreased from 7.91 ± 1.30 before physiotherapy to 3.14 ± 1.28 after physiotherapy. Treatment response was calculated as the difference between pain intensity before and after physiotherapy (VAS before physiotherapy - VAS after physiotherapy), with higher scores indicating a greater reduction in pain intensity following treatment. The mean treatment response score was 4.76 ± 1.01.
Pearson correlation analyses showed that treatment response was significantly and positively associated with secure attachment (r = 0.377, P < 0.001) and self-observation (r = 0.306, P < 0.001). In contrast, treatment response was significantly and negatively associated with social comparison (r = -0.276, P = 0.001), social feedback (r = -0.257, P = 0.001), and deterministic thinking (r = -0.200, P = 0.014). No statistically significant associations were observed between treatment response and avoidant attachment or ambivalent attachment (
Table 3).
Separate linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the statistical associations between psychological variables and treatment response. Regression assumptions, including normality of residuals, homoscedasticity, linearity, and multicollinearity, were assessed before analysis, and no serious violations were observed. Secure attachment was positively associated with treatment response (B = 0.089, β = 0.377, 95% CI: 0.054 to 0.124, P < 0.001). Self-observation was also positively associated with treatment response (B = 0.040, β = 0.259, 95% CI: 0.002 to 0.078, P = 0.038). In contrast, deterministic thinking showed a significant negative association with treatment response (B = -0.010, β = -0.200, 95% CI: -0.018 to -0.002, P = 0.014). Avoidant attachment, ambivalent attachment, social comparison, and social feedback were not significantly associated with treatment response in the regression analyses (
Table 4).