Validated Colorimetric Assay of Clonidine Hydrochloride from Pharmaceutical Preparations
Authors
Andreia Corciova
Department of Drugs Analysis, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research:Vol. 15, issue 1; 149-156
Published online:Jan 31, 2016
Article type:Original Article
Received:Nov 30, 2013
Accepted:Mar 31, 2014
How to Cite:Corciova A. Validated Colorimetric Assay of Clonidine Hydrochloride from Pharmaceutical Preparations. Iran J Pharm Res. 2016;15(1):e125095. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2016.1773
Abstract
Clonidine hydrochloride is an antihypertensive agent used for migraine prophylaxis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, menopausal flushing and Tourette syndrome. The quantity of the active substance in pharmaceutical preparations must be within specific limits, in agreement with the respective label claim. Therefore, the aim of this study was to establish the conditions for two spectrophotometric methods for clonidine determination, based on the formation of the ion pair complex between clonidine hydrochloride and thymol blue/bromophenol blue. A Jasco UV-Vis 530 spectrophotometer was used for the analysis and the maxim absorbance was measured at 418 nm/448 nm against blank solution. After validation, the methods were used for quantification of clonidine hydrochloride in two commercial samples (tablets). The recovery of active substance varies between 98.06 and 100.13 % without interferences from the excipients.
Clonidine (Figure 1), N-(2, 6-dichlorophenyl)-4, 5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-amine, is an imidazolinic derivative and exists as a mesomeric compound.
Figure 1
Chemical structure of clonidine hydrochloride
The substance is an α2-adrenergic agonist. The decrease of blood pressure is mainly due to a central action, exerted on the reticular nucleus of the bulb, with consequent reduction of peripheral sympathetic and vagal cardio-inhibitory reflexes. As a result of the reduced peripheral sympathetic function, the levels of norepinephrine in plasma decrease. It also acts upon specific receptors for imidazoline structure - I1 receptors that mediate the sympatho-inhibitory actions of imidazolines to lower the blood pressure.
Efficiency is highest 2-3 weeks after starting the treatment. It is used in hypertension - moderate and severe forms (commonly associated with diuretics, possibly with other antihypertensive), for prophylaxis of migraine and other forms of recurrent vascular headache and to treat menopausal flushing (1, 2). In an extended release formulation, FDA approved it for treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), from 2010 (3-5). Also, clonidine is used in Tourette syndrome (especially for tics) (6, 7).
It is contraindicated in patients with a history of depressive psychosis. It must be avoided or used with caution during pregnancy, severe cerebral arteriosclerosis, Raynaud's disease and obliterative thromboangiitis. Clonidine is contraindicated for drivers and those with other professions that require intense concentration and prolonged mental functions. It must not be administrated in association with alcohol and central depressants (barbiturates and other sedatives). Clonidine may present the next side effects: frequent dry mouth, constipation, drowsiness and sedation, relatively rare nausea, anorexia, sinus bradycardia, orthostatic hypotension, fluid retention (at baseline). Abrupt withdrawal may cause marked hypertension (rebound effect), headache, nervousness, tremor, gastrointestinal disorders (1, 2).
Clonidine hydrochloride is soluble in water and in anhydrous ethanol. The officialized analysis methods for clonidine hydrochloride are: a potentiometric titrimetric assay for drug determination according to European Pharmacopoeia and British Pharmacopoeia, and a spectrophotometric method based on the reaction with bromothymol blue for clonidine quantification in tablets, as described in British Pharmacopoeia (8, 9). The literature presents several methods for determination of clonidine hydrochloride from tablets, most of them being high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (10-13). There are a few colorimetric methods using reactions with sodium nitroprusside in presence of sodium hydroxide or with bromocresol green and supracen violet (14-17). Other methods used for clonidine hydrochloride analysis from tables are capillary electrophoresis (18), potentiometric assay (19), spectrophotometric titration in different non-aqueous solvents (20), derivative ratio spectrophotometry method and solvent extraction flow injection analysis using bromophenol blue (21).
Ion pair extraction has received considerable interest for quantitative determination of drugs because is a simple, cheap, sensitive and rapid method unlike other methods that are modern, expedient but involve complex instruments which may not be available in most laboratories. The aim of this study was to describe two methods for clonidine hydrochloride assay, based on the ion pair extraction technique, using thymol blue and bromophenol blue (22). In order to validate the proposed methods, we investigated the following validation parameters: linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, precision and accuracy in accordance with the bioanalytical method validation guidelines (23-26).
Experimental
Chemicals and reagents
Clonidine hydrochloride pure reference substance was supplied by Sigma Aldrich.
Clonidine hydrochloride tablets containing 0.15 mg drug were purchased from the pharmacy (two commercial products).
Bromophenol blue solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g bromophenol blue (Riedel de Haen) in 20 mL methanol and adding distilled water to 100 mL.
Thymol blue solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g thymol blue (Riedel de Haen) in 100 mL methanol.
Acetate buffer solution pH = 3 was prepared by dissolving 12 g sodium acetate in 50 mL distilled water, then adding 6 ml acetic acid and completing to 100 mL with distilled water.
Method using bromophenol blue: 1 mL from each working solution was mixed into a separating funnel with 1 mL acetate buffer solution of pH = 3 and 1 mL of bromophenol blue solution. The complex was extracted for 5 min with two portions of 5 mL chloroform, passed through anhydrous sodium sulphate and completed with chloroform. After 30 min, the absorbance was measured at the wavelength of maximum absorption 448 nm, versus a blank solution prepared in similar conditions.
Method using thymol blue: 1 mL from each working solution was mixed into a separating funnel with 1 mL acetate buffer solution of pH = 3 and 2 mL of thymol blue solution. The complex was extracted for 5 min with two portion of 5 mL chloroform, passed through anhydrous sodium sulphate and completed with chloroform. After 20 min, the absorbance was measured at the wavelength of maximum absorption-418 nm, versus a blank solution prepared in similar conditions.
Preparation of stock standard solution100μg/mL:
10 mg of clonidine hydrochloride was dissolved in 3 mL methanol and completed to 100 mL with distilled water.
Working solutions
Containing from 0.5-7.5 μg/mL clonidine hydrochloride were obtained by diluting the stock solution with distilled water.
Preparation of sample solutions:
Twenty tablets from each sample product were weighed. Their average weight was calculated and then they were finely powdered in a glass mortar. Two quantities of powder, each equivalent to 30 mg clonidine hydrochloride, were weighed and transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask. 10 mL methanol and 20 mL distilled water were added to both flasks and stirred for 10 min to dissolve the drug. The solutions were filtered through Whatman filter paper and completed to 100 mL with distilled water. The sample solutions were marked as Sample 1 and Sample 2. The procedure was continued as described on ion-pair formation procedure.
Instrument
A Jasco V 530 double beam UV-Vis spectrophotometer was used. All the measurements were made in 1.0 cm quartz cells at a scan speed of 1000 nm min-1 and scan range of 400-600 nm, fixed slit width of 2 nm.
Results and Discussion
Optimization of variables
Selection of solvents for extraction of the complex
1 mL of working solution was mixed with 1 mL acetate buffer solution of pH = 3 and 1 mL of bromophenol blue solution/2 mL thymol blue solution. Then the complex was extracted with CCl4, chloroform and dichloromethane and the absorbances were measured at 448 nm/418 nm.
Because the maximum absorbance was obtained with chloroform (Table 1), it was chosen as extraction solvent.
Table 1
Selection of solvents for extraction of the complex
Solvents
Absorbance ± SD
Bromophenol blue
Thymol blue
CCl4
-
-
Chloroform
1. 0896 ± 0.003
0.8796 ± 0.007
Dichloromethane
0.4315 ± 0.036
0.2673 ± 0.005
Selection of pH and reaction time
1 mL bromophenol blue solution/2 mL thymol blue solution was added to the 1 mL working solution and the pH was adjusted to pH = 3, pH = 4.6 and pH = 5. After extraction, the absorbances were recorded at different time intervals. The results are represented in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Figure 2
Selection of pH dependence and reaction time for method with bromophenol blue solution.
Figure 3
Selection of pH dependence and reaction time for method with thymol blue solution.
As it can be seen, the optimal stabilities of the formed complexes were obtained at pH = 3 with both dyes and the optimum reaction time was 30 min for bromophenol blue solution method and 20 min for thymol blue solution method.
Selection of dye concentration and quantity
The influence of the concentration of dyes and the quantity used are presented in Table 2 and Table 3.
Table 2
Selection of dye concentration
Dyes
0.05%
0.1%
0.5%
Bromophenol blue solution
0.1955
0.6911
0.5425
Thymol blue solution
0.4825
0.5862
0.3602
Table 3
Selection of dye quantity
Dyes
0.5 mL
1 mL
1.5 mL
2 mL
2.5 mL
Bromophenol blue solution
0.2132
0.6763
0.6752
0.6743
0.6729
Thymol blue solution
-
0.5862
0.7108
0.8856
0.8662
The optimum concentration of the two dyes used was 0.1% and the quantity of dye was established at 1 mL for bromophenol blue solution and 2 mL for thymol blue solution.
Validation of methods
Linearity
Three determinations for each concentration were made and a mean value of the absorbances read at 448 nm/418 nm was calculated (Table 4). The calibration curves were obtained by plotting the mean values of the absorbances of clonidine hydrochloride vs clonidine hydrochloride concentrations (μg/mL) and are presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Table 4
Absorbance values for linearity study
Statistical data
Method with bromophenol blue solution
Method with thymol blue solution
Pearson Coefficient (r2)
0.999
0.9995
Standard Error
0.012978
0.003889
Intercept
0.4628
0.6213
Slope
0.1245
0.0528
Limit of detection
0.039115
0.011721
Limit of quantification
0.11853
0.035519
Figure 4
Calibration curve for clonidine hydrochloride with bromophenol blue solution
Figure 5
Calibration curve for clonidine hydrochloride with thymol blue solution
Statistical data regarding clonidine hydrochloride determination are shown in Table 5.
Table 5
Statistical data regarding clonidine hydrochloride determination
Statistical data
Method with bromophenol blue solution
Method with thymol blue solution
Pearson Coefficient (r2)
0.999
0.9995
Standard Error
0.012978
0.003889
Intercept
0.4628
0.6213
Slope
0.1245
0.0528
Limit of detection
0.039115
0.011721
Limit of quantification
0.11853
0.035519
Repeatability (System precision)
For determination of repeatability, solutions at concentrations of 1.5 μg/mL in six replicates were used. The absorbances were measured and then the average, SD and % RSD were calculated. Table 6 shows the experimental data of the absorbances related to the precision of the system.
Table 6
Experimental data of the absorbances relating to the precision of the system
No
Absorbance
Method with bromophenol blue solution
Method with thymol blue solution
1.
0.6759
0.7028
2.
0.6692
0.6999
3.
0.6649
0.6983
4.
0.6703
0.7058
5.
0.6732
0.711
6.
0.6697
0.7037
Average
0.6705
0.7035
SD
0.0037
0.0045
% RSD
0.5587
0.6420
Relative standard deviation (RSD) was found to be 0.5587% and 0.6420% respectively, which is lower than the maximum 2% proposed by the European standards, so the system is considered to be precise.
Method precision and accuracy
To investigate the method precision, solutions of three concentration levels were chosen and three determinations were made for each of them. Tables 7 and 8 present the calculated concentrations and the recovery of the methods in the same day, at different times (8.00 a.m., 12.00 a.m. and 16.00 p.m.) and in 3 consecutive days (day 1, 2 and 3).
Table 7
Calculated concentrations and the recovery of the method in the same day
Method with bromophenol blue solution
8.00 a.m.
12.00 a.m.
16.00 a.m.
Abs
Calc. conc.
% Recovery
Abs
Calc. conc.
% Recovery
Abs
Calc. conc.
% Recovery
0.6495
1.4995
99.97
0.6499
1.5028
100.18
0.6489
1.4947
99.65
0.6488
1.4939
99.59
0.6478
1.4859
99.06
0.6478
1.4859
99.06
0.6477
1.4851
99.00
0.65
1.5036
100.24
0.648
1.4875
99.17
0.7745
2.5036
100.14
0.7737
2.4971
99.88
0.7746
2.5044
100.17
0.7721
2.4843
99.37
0.7742
2.5012
100.04
0.7738
2.4979
99.91
0.7739
2.4987
99.95
0.7737
2.4971
99.88
0.7741
2.5004
100.01
1.0852
4.9991
99.98
1.0802
4.9590
99.18
1.0803
4.9598
99.19
1.0829
4.9807
99.61
1.0805
4.9614
99.22
1.081
4.9654
99.31
1.0859
5.0048
100.09
1.0811
4.9662
99.32
1.0839
4.9887
99.77
Average
99.75
Average
99.67
Average
99.58
SD
0.379
SD
0.468
SD
0.412
% RSD
0.380
% RSD
0.469
% RSD
0.414
Method with thymol blue solution
8.00 a.m.
12.00 a.m.
16.00 a.m.
Abs
Calc. conc.
% Recovery
Abs
Calc. conc.
% Recovery
Abs
Calc. conc.
% Recovery
0.6998
1.4867
99.11
0.701
1.5094
100.63
0.6999
1.4886
99.24
0.7001
1.4924
99.49
0.7009
1.5075
100.50
0.7012
1.5132
100.88
0.7011
1.5113
100.75
0.7009
1.5075
100.50
0.7
1.4905
99.36
0.7522
2.4791
99.16
0.7537
2.5075
100.30
0.7525
2.4848
99.39
0.754
2.5132
100.53
0.7529
2.4924
99.69
0.752
2.4753
99.01
0.7538
2.5094
100.37
0.7528
2.4905
99.62
0.7522
2.4791
99.16
0.8849
4.9924
99.84
0.8845
4.9848
99.69
0.8839
4.9734
99.46
0.8852
4.9981
99.96
0.8839
4.9734
99.46
0.8839
4.9734
99.46
0.8851
4.9962
99.92
0.8828
4.9526
99.05
0.886
5.0132
100.26
Average
99.90
Average
99.94
Average
99.58
SD
0.579
SD
0.556
SD
0.59
% RSD
0.580
% RSD
0.556
% RSD
0.60
Table 8
Recovery values of the method in three consecutive days
% RSD
% RSD
% RSD
Method with bromophenol blue solution
Day 1
0.42
Day 2
0.56
Day 3
0.61
Method with thymol blue solution
Day 1
0.57
Day 2
0.65
Day 3
0.59
The mean recovery of the tests made in the same day for the method with bromophenol blue solution was in the range 99,00-100,24%, with SD = 0.379-0.468 and % RSD = 0.38-0.469 and for the method with thymol blue solution was in the range 99.01-100.88%, with SD = 0.556-0.59 and % RSD = 0.556-0.60.
The RSD values in 3 different days were in the range 0.42-0.61 for the bromophenol blue solution method and in the range 0.57-0.65 for thymol blue solution method.
As it can be seen the RSD values are lower than maximum 5% proposed by the European standards, therefore the method is accurate.
Application on tablets
The applicability of the two methods was demonstrated on two samples from pharmacy (Sample 1 and Sample 2), in 3 consecutive days, on 3 replicates each day. Table 9 presents the average of the 3 replicates of mg clonidine hydrochloride/tablet found and % recovery, considering that the declared concentration is 0.15 mg/tablet.
Table 9
Clonidine hydrochloride concentrations found in samples
Method with bromophenol blue solution
Sample 1
Sample 2
mg found/tablet ± SD
%Recovery
mg found/tablet ± SD
%Recovery
Day 1
0.1490 ± 0.003
99.33
0.1471 ± 0.031
98.06
Day 2
0.1499 ± 0.012
99.93
0.1475 ± 0.007
98.33
Day 3
0.1502 ± 0.029
100.13
0.1486 ± 0.005
99.06
Method with thymol blue solution
Sample 1
Sample 2
mg found/tablet ± SD
%Recovery
mg found/tablet ± SD
%Recovery
Day 1
0.1495 ± 0.026
99.66
0.1472 ± 0.008
98.13
Day 2
0.1503 ± 0.015
100.2
0.1477 ± 0.006
98.46
Day 3
0.1492 ± 0.079
99.46
0.1478 ± 0.017
98.53
The results obtained in the 3 days comply with the limits imposed by the regulations of Romanian Pharmacopoeia 10th edition, Monography - Compressi [± 10%] (27) and the recoveries of active substance are in agreement with their respective label claim. Also, the results were compared with those obtained by the spectrophotometric method stipulated in European Pharmacopoeia and the differences were insignificant.
Conclusion
This paper establishes the conditions for clonidine hydrochloride assay by two spectrophotometric methods using bromophenol blue solution and thymol blue solution in acid medium. The methods are simple, cheap, accurate and precise and the results obtained showed that the proposed method for quantification of clonidine hydrochloride comply with validation parameters and can be applied successfully to the determination of substance in marketed formulations.
References
1.
Food and Drug Administration. Catapres (Clonidine Hydrochloride). Tables Prescribing Information. The Administration, USA. 2009:1-8.
Palumbo D, Sallee F, Pelham W Jr, Bukstein O, Daviss W, McDermott M. Clonidine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:180-8. [PubMed ID: 18182963].
4.
Connor FD, Fletcher KE, Swanson JM. A meta-analysis of clonidine for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38:1551-9. [PubMed ID: 10596256].
6.
Leckman JF, Hardin MT, Riddle MA, Stevenson J, Ort SI, Cohen DJ. Clonidine treatment of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48:324-8. [PubMed ID: 2009034].
7.
Schapiro NA. "Dude, you don't have Tourette's:" Tourette's syndrome, beyond the tics. Pediatr Nurs. 2002;3:243-53. [PubMed ID: 12087644].
8.
British Pharmacopoeia Commission Secretariat. British Pharmacopoeia volume III, Monography Clonidine Tablets. 2015.
10.
Walters SM, Stonys DB. Determination of chlorthalidone and clonidine hydrochloride in tablets by HPLC. J Chromatogr Sci. 1983;21:43-5. [PubMed ID: 6833444].
11.
Yong-Gui MA, Zi-Ming L, Min M, Guo-Fang HE, Qiu-Lan W, Wen-Qing W. Determination of clonidine hydrochloride in compound clonidine hydrochloride tablets by RP-HPLC. Herald of Medicine. 2010;29:522-4.
12.
Wolf CE, Poklis A. A rapid HPLC procedure of analysis of analgesic pharmaceutical mixtures quality assurance and drug diversion testing. J Anal Toxicol. 2005;29:711-4. [PubMed ID: 16419405].
13.
Devanaboyina N, Kumar BC, Vijay B, Bhanu MA, Gayathri V. Liquid chromatography method development and validation for analysis of clonidine in pharmaceutical dosage. J Atom Mol. 2012;2:93-102.
Zivanov-Stakic D, Panic L, Agbaba G. Spectrophotometric determination of clonidine in dosage forms using bromocresol green. Farmaco. 1990;45:381-3. [PubMed ID: 2383349].
16.
Guimaraes SS, Sousa GD, Grangeiro S Jr, Castelo Branco DM, Albuquerque MM, Leal LB, Santana DP. Spectrophotometric determination of clonidine hydrochloride through the formation of ion-pair complex. Lat Am J Pharm. 2012;31:1222-5.
17.
Sastry CSP, Sailaja A, Rao TT, Krishna DM. Spectrophotometric determination of clonidine hydrochloride through the formation of ion-pair complex 3B. Indian Drugs. 1992;29:473-7.
18.
Sheng-Rain SU, Yun-Qiu YU. Simultaneous determination of clonidine hydrochloride hydrochlorothiazide as rutin in Zhenju tablet by capillary electrophoresis. J Chin Pharm Sci. 2005;14:173-5.
19.
Ganjali MR, Karimi A, Shahtaheri SJ, Norouzi P. Determination of clonidine by potentiometry using PVC membrane electrode. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8:1999-2008.
20.
Sell E, Chmielewska A, Konieczna L. Spectrophotometric titration of the mixtures containing antihypertensive agents in non-aqueous differentiating solvents. Chem Anal. 2000;45:249-55.
21.
Haggag RS, Belal SF, Abdel-Aziz Shaalan R. Selective stability-indicating methods for the determination of clonidine hydrochloride and/or its related substance, 2, 6-dichloroaniline. J Food DrugAnal. 2011;19:174.
22.
Gölcü A, Yücesoy C. Colorimetric determination of amlodipine besylate in tablets. J Sci Eng Res. 2006;9:52-4.
23.
Narade S, Patil S, Surve S, Shete D, Pore Y. Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for the determination of diacerein in capsules. Digest J Nanomaterials Biostructures. 2010;5:113-8.
24.
Anandakumar K, Kannan K, Vetrichelvan T. Development and validation of emitricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumerate in pure and in fixed combination by UV spectrophotometry. Digest J Nanomaterials Biostructures. 2011;6:1085-90.
25.
Rouessac F, Rouessac A. Chemical Analysis: Modern Instrumental Methods and Techniques. John Willey and Sons LTD, Chichester. 2000:385-400.
26.
International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (2005) ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Q2(R 1), Complementary Guideline on Methodology dated 06 November. ICH, London; 1996.
27.
Romanian Pharmacopoeia. Monography Compressi. . 10th ed. Editura Medicala, Bucuresti; 1993. p. 284-6.
Souri E, Amoon E, Shabani Ravari N, Keyghobadi F, Barazandeh Tehrani M. Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Sunitinib in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms Based on Ion-pair Complex Formation. Iran J Pharm Res. 2020;19(3):e124388. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.1101119
Kazemipour M, Ansari M. Derivative Spectrophotometry for Simultaneous Analysis of Chlorpheniramine Maleate, Phenylephrine HCl, and Phenylpropanolamine HCl in Ternary Mixtures and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Iran J Pharm Res. 2022;4(3):e128238. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.630
Amanlou M, Ghazi Moghadam A, Barazandeh Tehrani M, Souri E. Validated Spectrophtometric Method for Determination of Tamsulosin in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014;13(1):e125419. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2014.1417
Souri E, Ahmadi FS, Barazandeh Tehrani M, Hosseini MM, Fadaye Vatan S. Validated Spectrophtometric Method for Simultaneous Determination of Buprenorphine and Naloxone in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Iran J Pharm Res. 2017;16(1):e124910. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2017.1978