Cover image of the article: Comparative Bioavailability of Ranitidine Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Image Credit:Iran J Pharm Res

Comparative Bioavailability of Ranitidine Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Authors

Reza Aboofazeli1,*, Alireza Shafaati2
1Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Shaheed Beheshti Uni versity of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Tehran, Iran. Email:aboofazeli@hotmail.com

Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research:Vol. 1, issue 1; 1-6
Published online:Jul 31, 2002
Article type:Research Article
Received:Feb 01, 2002
Accepted:Jul 01, 2002
How to Cite:Aboofazeli R, Shafaati A. Comparative Bioavailability of Ranitidine Tablets in Healthy Volunteers. Iran J Pharm Res. 2002;1(1):e129835. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.2

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic parameters of domestic and imported ranitidine hydrochloride tablets (Ranitidine, formulated and manufactured by Kharazmi Pharmaceuticals, Iran, and Zantac® manufactured by Glaxo, UK) were measured in 14 healthy subjects following oral administration of a single 300-mg dose of each brand and compared for bioequivalence evaluation.

The pharmaceutical equivalency of both formulations was shown by in vitro characterization and dissolution testing. The comparative bioavailability of the two products was then determined in a single-blind, single dose, randomized, cross-over study in 14 healthy volunteers. A sensitive, rapid and precise high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was used to measure concentrations of ranitidine in plasma samples collected up to 12 hours following each dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-¥ , elimination rate constant (k) and half life were determined for both formulations.

Analysis of the data revealed that the variations in all pharmacokinetic parameters were not statistically significant (p> 0.05), and the 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference mean ratios of the plasma pharmacokinetic variables lie within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80-125%. Therefore, both formulations were comparable based on the in vitro characterization and were bioequivalent in terms of Cmax and AUC.

The two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.

Highlights

Copyright

© 2002, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

31
Jan
2020
Logic of Selecting Suitable Dissolution Parameters in New Drug Formulations Based on A BCS Approach

Logic of Selecting Suitable Dissolution Parameters in New Drug Formulations Based on A BCS Approach

Raúl Medina-López,
Edgar E. Arregui,
Edson J. Aranda,
Luis A. Moreno-Rocha,
Marcela Hurtado,
Helgi Jung-Cook
,et al.

Medina-López R, Arregui EE, Aranda EJ, Moreno-Rocha LA, Hurtado M, et al. Logic of Selecting Suitable Dissolution Parameters in New Drug Formulations Based on A BCS Approach. Iran J Pharm Res. 2020;19(1):e124438. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.1100993

30
Apr
2014
Bioequivalence Comparison of Two Formulations of Fixed-Dose Combination Glimepiride/Metformin (2/500 mg)Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Bioequivalence Comparison of Two Formulations of Fixed-Dose Combination Glimepiride/Metformin (2/500 mg)Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Sang-hoon Jung,
Jung-woo Chae,
Byung-jeong Song,
Kwang-il Kwona

Jung S, Chae J, Song B, Kwona K. Bioequivalence Comparison of Two Formulations of Fixed-Dose Combination Glimepiride/Metformin (2/500 mg)Tablets in Healthy Volunteers. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014;13(2):e125532. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2014.1495

3
Apr
2025
Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Apixaban Tablets: A Double-Blind, Single-Dose, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Apixaban Tablets: A Double-Blind, Single-Dose, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects

Erfan Abdollahizad,
Azadeh Haeri,
Abolghasem Jouyban,
Mohammad Reza Afshar Mogaddam,
Zahra Abbasian,
Simin Dadashzadeh

Abdollahizad E, Haeri A, Jouyban A, Afshar Mogaddam MR, Abbasian Z, et al. Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Apixaban Tablets: A Double-Blind, Single-Dose, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects. Iran J Pharm Res. 2025;24(1):e157714. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpr-157714

30
Apr
2014
Metabolite Parameters as an Appropriate Alternative Approach for Assessment of Bioequivalence of Two Verapamil Formulations

Metabolite Parameters as an Appropriate Alternative Approach for Assessment of Bioequivalence of Two Verapamil Formulations

Azadeh Haeri,
Bahareh Javadian,
Roonak Saadati,
Simin Dadashzadeh

Haeri A, Javadian B, Saadati R, Dadashzadeh S. Metabolite Parameters as an Appropriate Alternative Approach for Assessment of Bioequivalence of Two Verapamil Formulations. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014;13(2):e125531. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2014.1508

20
Nov
2010
Bioequivalence Studies of Two Formulations of Baclofen Tablet in Healthy Volunteers

Bioequivalence Studies of Two Formulations of Baclofen Tablet in Healthy Volunteers

Seyed Mohsen Foroutan,
Alireza Shafaati,
Afshin Zarghi,
A Khoddam

Foroutan SM, Shafaati A, Zarghi A, Khoddam A. Bioequivalence Studies of Two Formulations of Baclofen Tablet in Healthy Volunteers. Iran J Pharm Res. 2022;2(3):e127970. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2010.52

More by these authors

Reza AboofazeliPubMedScholar
Alireza ShafaatiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics