Immediate versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Uncomplicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Nichita-Brendea Mihnea-Traian; Virgil Popa; Dorina-Carmen Polojintef-Corbu; Mircea Popescu

International Cardiovascular Research Journal

The Official Annually Journal of Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue All Issues In Press Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Boards & Committees Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Reviewer and AE Registration Form Support Contact Us

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

Immediate versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Uncomplicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Author(s):

Nichita-Brendea Mihnea-Traian

^1,*,

Virgil Popa²,

Dorina-Carmen Polojintef-Corbu³,

Mircea Popescu³

1Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania

2Cardiology Department, Clinical Emergency County Hospital of Oradea, Oradea, Romania

3Department of Cardiology, Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Oradea, Romania, Assistant Lecturer at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacology of Oradea, Oradea, Romania

International Cardiovascular Research Journal:Vol. 15, issue 3; e116878

Published online:Sep 30, 2021

Article type:Research Article

Received:Jun 06, 2021

Accepted:Oct 06, 2021

How to Cite:Mihnea-Traian N, Popa V, Polojintef-Corbu D, Popescu M. Immediate versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Uncomplicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2021;15(3):e116878. doi:

Abstract

Background: Although Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) has been established as the best treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), there is a gap in the evidence about the optimal time when non-Infarct Related Artery (IRA) lesions should be revascularized.

Objectives: The first primary outcome was defined as death within a timeframe of one year from the complete revascularization. The second primary outcome was a composite of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular events (MACCE) within a year following complete revascularization. Overall, the study aimed to compare the two study groups (patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) presenting with STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock, in which complete revascularization was attained using either complete revascularization during the PPCI (group A) or during the same hospital admission (group B)) regarding the occurrence of the above-mentioned outcomes.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study aimed to review the outcomes in two groups, each consisting of 50 consecutive MVD patients with STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock. The patients included in the trial underwent successful culprit-lesion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) between 1 January 2017 and 1 June 2019. Then, they underwent complete revascularization with either PCI of all angiographically significant non-culprit lesions in the index PPCI procedure (group A) or during a second procedure that took place during the same hospital admission (group B).

Results: The first primary outcome was observed in 4% of the whole study population (n = b2, P = 0.98), while the second primary outcome was detected in 6% of the patients (n = 3, P = 0.97). The results revealed no significant difference between the two groups concerning the outcomes.

Conclusions: Among the MVD patients with STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock, there was no significant difference regarding the outcomes when using the complete revascularization of non-culprit lesions during PPCI and in a second PCI session at the same hospital admission.

Keywords

Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease

Fulltext

The full-text is available in pdf.

References

1.
The references are available in pdf.

In-hospital and late outcome of rescue versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Hossein Vakili,

Roxana Sadeghi,

Solmaz Borjian,

Naser Kachoueian

30

Jun

2011

A Comparison of Outcomes of Routine Early Angiography versus Delayed Ischemia-Guided Angiography after Thrombolytic Therapy in ST Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

HA Basiri,

Reza Kiani,

S Abdi,

A Zahedmehr,

HR Sanati,

F Shakerian

,et al.

30

Oct

2019

Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Observational Study

Roxana Sadeghi,

Zohreh Maghsoomi,

Naser Kachoueian,

Mohammad Sistanizad,

Zahra Soroureddin,

Mohammad Ali Akbarzadeh

17

Jul

2017

Short-term Cost-effectiveness of Reteplase versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute STEMI a Tertiary Hospital in Iran

Khalil Alimohammadzadeh,

Roxana Sadeghi,

Ali Maher,

Mohammad Kazem Kazemi

1

Jul

2016

Evaluation of the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft on Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery with and without Other Coronary Arteries Involvement

Behshad Naghshtabrizi,

Zahra Sohrabi,

Farzad Emami,

Babak Manafi,

Shafee Membari

Import into EndNote Import into BibTex

Indexed in

Scopus

Share on

Comments

Number of Comments:0

Cited by

Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 2 weeks ago
CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 12 hours ago

Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC

Search Relations

Author(s):

Nichita-Brendea Mihnea-Traian:[PubMed][Scholar]
Virgil Popa:[PubMed][Scholar]
Dorina-Carmen Polojintef-Corbu:[PubMed][Scholar]
Mircea Popescu:[PubMed][Scholar]

The Official Annually Journal of Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Outlines

Immediate versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Uncomplicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Abstract

Fulltext

References

Similar Articles

In-hospital and late outcome of rescue versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

A Comparison of Outcomes of Routine Early Angiography versus Delayed Ischemia-Guided Angiography after Thrombolytic Therapy in ST Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Observational Study

Short-term Cost-effectiveness of Reteplase versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute STEMI a Tertiary Hospital in Iran

Evaluation of the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft on Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery with and without Other Coronary Arteries Involvement

Last Update: 2 weeks ago

Last Update: 2 weeks ago

Last Update: 2 weeks ago

Last Update: 12 hours ago