Cover image of the article: Identification of patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis using microscopic observation and PCR methods

Image Credit:J Clin Res Paramed Sci

Identification of patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis using microscopic observation and PCR methods

Authors

Alisha Akia1, Yazdan Hamzavi2,*, Naser Nazari2, Esmat Rashiditabar3
1Department of Medical Microbiology, School of medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
2Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology,School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
3Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Yazdan Hamzavi, Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology,School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran, E-mail: Email: yhamzavi@kums.ac.ir

Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences:Vol. 5, issue 3; e81496
Published online:Sep 03, 2016
Article type:Research Article
Received:Feb 10, 2016
Accepted:Jul 17, 2016
How to Cite: Akia A, Hamzavi Y, Nazari N, Rashiditabar E. Identification of patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis using microscopic observation and PCR methods. J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2016;5(3):e81496. doi:

Abstract

Introduction: Leishmaniasis is endemic in more than 88 countries and threatens more than 350 million people. Until recently, diagnosis was based primarily on clinical symptoms and microscopic observation of parasites in stained tissue smears.PCR methods using either genomic or kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) are now frequently used as the most sensitive test for screening the suspected patients of cutaneous Leishmaniasis. In this study, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of microscopic observation in diagnosis of cutaneous Leishmaniasis compared with the PCR technique as the gold standard.

Methods: Skin biopsies stored in ethanol from 45 patients with suspected cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) were tested in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as the gold standard. Then the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of conventional diagnostic method of microscopic observation of Giemsa stained smears were calculated.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of conventional diagnostic method of microscopic observation was 71%, 100%, 100% and 71.9%, respectively.

Conclusion The PCR technique has the more ability in distinguishing healthy subjects from patients than microscopic observation of Giemsa stained smears.

Highlights

Fulltext

The full text of this article is available on PDF.

References

  • 1.
    The References of this article is available on PDF.

Copyright

© 2016, Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

25
Aug
2007
Evaluation of a direct PCR in comparison with routine microscopy and In vitro culture for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Evaluation of a direct PCR in comparison with routine microscopy and In vitro culture for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

B Fouladi,
Iraj Sharifi,
Seyyed Mohammad Hashemi Shahri,
HR Moradgholi,
A Sarabandi,
Adel Ebrahimzadeh
,et al.

Fouladi B, Sharifi I, Hashemi Shahri SM, Moradgholi H, Sarabandi A, et al. Evaluation of a direct PCR in comparison with routine microscopy and In vitro culture for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2007;9(3):e94788. doi:

7
Dec
2011
Comparison of Traditional Methods and PCR for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in South-West of Iran

Comparison of Traditional Methods and PCR for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in South-West of Iran

Shahram Khademvatan,
Jasem Saki,
Sharif Maraghi

Khademvatan S, Saki J, Maraghi S. Comparison of Traditional Methods and PCR for Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in South-West of Iran. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2012;14(8):e93257. doi:

31
Oct
2010
Molecular identification of Leishmania species causing cutaneous leishmaniasis in Mashhad, Iran

Molecular identification of Leishmania species causing cutaneous leishmaniasis in Mashhad, Iran

Mohammad Reza Mahmoodi,
Masoud Mohajery,
Jalil Tavakkol Afshari,
Mohhamad Taghae Shakeri,
Mohhamad Javad Yazdan Panah,
Fariba Berenji
,et al.

Mahmoodi MR, Mohajery M, Tavakkol Afshari J, Shakeri MT, Yazdan Panah MJ, et al. Molecular identification of Leishmania species causing cutaneous leishmaniasis in Mashhad, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2010;3(4):. doi:

17
Aug
2019
Comparison of Nested-PCR and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Diagnosis

Comparison of Nested-PCR and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Diagnosis

Jasem Saki,
Davod Amraee,
Mehrdad Ghasemian

Saki J, Amraee D, Ghasemian M. Comparison of Nested-PCR and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Diagnosis. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2019;12(8):e94171. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.94171

15
Feb
2016
Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Two Highly Endemic Metropolises of Iran, Application of FTA Cards for DNA Extraction From Giemsa-Stained Slides

Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Two Highly Endemic Metropolises of Iran, Application of FTA Cards for DNA Extraction From Giemsa-Stained Slides

Shahrokh Izadi,
Hossein Mirhendi,
Niloufar Jalalizand,
Hossein Khodadadi,
Mehdi Mohebali,
Shahram Nekoeian
,et al.

Izadi S, Mirhendi H, Jalalizand N, Khodadadi H, Mohebali M, et al. Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Two Highly Endemic Metropolises of Iran, Application of FTA Cards for DNA Extraction From Giemsa-Stained Slides. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(2):e32885. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.32885

More by these authors

Alisha AkiaPubMedScholar
Yazdan HamzaviPubMedScholar
Naser NazariPubMedScholar
Esmat RashiditabarPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics