Cover image of the article: Comparison of tubal ligation by bipolar electrocoagulation and Filshie-Clips

Image Credit:J Inflamm Dis

Comparison of tubal ligation by bipolar electrocoagulation and Filshie-Clips

Authors

F Ramezani Tehrani, SM sadat Hashemi,*, M Heidari seraj
*Corresponding Author: Email: smsadathashemi@mail.com

Journal of Inflammatory Diseases:Vol. 5, issue 4; 35-41
Published online:Mar 31, 2002
Article type:Research Article
How to Cite:Ramezani Tehrani F, sadat Hashemi S, Heidari seraj M. Comparison of tubal ligation by bipolar electrocoagulation and Filshie-Clips. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;5(4):e154847. doi:

Abstract

Background: Finding simple, lowcost and safe way for tubal ligation is of great importance. Objective: To compare the duration of operation, recovery and complications (Up to one week) in these methods. Methods: 281 volunteered women for laparascopic sterilization were enrolled into a randomized clinical trial and were sterilized by filshie-clips or bipolar electrocoagulation. Duration of operation, recovery time and complication of both methods were compared. Findings: No major complications were reported in this study. However, surgery complications were observed in 4.1% of the cases. The duration of operation was 15.1±10.7 and 10±4.4 minutes to carry out filshie-clip and bipolar electrocoagulation sterilization method, respectively. Duration of return to normal activities were 2.6±1.74 and 1.3±1.1 days, respectively. The rate of complication of these two approaches did not have a significant difference. Conclusion: Duration of surgery and also recovery time were significantly shorter for users of bipolar electrocoagulation method, rather than filshie clip one.

Highlights

Copyright

© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

30
Jun
1999
‌A comparison of bipolar electrocoagulation and Filshie-Clips in Tubal Ligatio

‌A comparison of bipolar electrocoagulation and Filshie-Clips in Tubal Ligatio

F Amidi,
M Naseri

Amidi F, Naseri M. ‌A comparison of bipolar electrocoagulation and Filshie-Clips in Tubal Ligatio. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;3(2):e154651. doi:

30
Sep
2000
Comparison of tubal ligation by minilaparotomy (Pomeroy) and laparrscopy (Filsie-Clips)

Comparison of tubal ligation by minilaparotomy (Pomeroy) and laparrscopy (Filsie-Clips)

F Amidi,
S Naseri

Amidi F, Naseri S. Comparison of tubal ligation by minilaparotomy (Pomeroy) and laparrscopy (Filsie-Clips). J Inflamm Dis. 2024;4(2):e154712. doi:

31
Dec
2005
A comparative study on incidence of post tubal ligation vomiting between two different anesthetic airway managements

A comparative study on incidence of post tubal ligation vomiting between two different anesthetic airway managements

MB Khezri,
S Madani

Khezri M, Madani S. A comparative study on incidence of post tubal ligation vomiting between two different anesthetic airway managements. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;9(3):e155143. doi:

23
Sep
2023
The Outcomes of Using Scalpel and Electrosurgery Methods for Anterior Abdominal Wall Incision During Cesarean Section

The Outcomes of Using Scalpel and Electrosurgery Methods for Anterior Abdominal Wall Incision During Cesarean Section

Hooshang Akbari,
AzamSadat Mahmoudian,
Seyed-Nouraddin Mousavi Nasab,
Ebrahim NasiriFormi,
Fatemeh Pouladkhay

Akbari H, Mahmoudian A, Mousavi Nasab S, NasiriFormi E, Pouladkhay F. The Outcomes of Using Scalpel and Electrosurgery Methods for Anterior Abdominal Wall Incision During Cesarean Section. Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2023;21(2):e139181. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/amh-139181

4
Oct
2023
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the FemoStop Device and Sandbag Pressure on Hemostasis During Sheath Removal and Reducing Puncture Site Complications Following Transfemoral Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the FemoStop Device and Sandbag Pressure on Hemostasis During Sheath Removal and Reducing Puncture Site Complications Following Transfemoral Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Hojjat Niknam Sarabi,
Zahra Farsi,
Younes Ghelich,
Behzad Moradi,
Seyyed Hossein Mousavi

Niknam Sarabi H, Farsi Z, Ghelich Y, Moradi B, Mousavi SH. Comparison of the Effectiveness of the FemoStop Device and Sandbag Pressure on Hemostasis During Sheath Removal and Reducing Puncture Site Complications Following Transfemoral Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Jundishapur J Chronic Dis Care. 2023;12(4):e139002. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-139002

More by these authors

F Ramezani TehraniPubMedScholar
SM sadat HashemiPubMedScholar
M Heidari serajPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics