Journal of Inflammatory Diseases
The Official Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
The effect of forceps type on results and complications of transbronchial lung biopsy
Abstract
Background: Lung biopsy via the bronchus (TBLB) is among the routine diagnostic procedures for pulmonary diseases and is performed using either of two different kinds of forceps: cup and alligator. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two kinds of forceps on quality of biopsy as well as the side effects of TBLB. Methods: This was a prospective, observational and double-blind study in which four samples were biopsied from each patient via TBLB. The sample characteristics were recorded based on size, number of alveoli included, diagnostic value, and the side effects such as pneumothorax and bleeding. Findings: A total number of 44 patients and 176 biopsies were evaluated. Twenty one patients (47.7%) were males and 23 (52.3%) females. While considering the size of samples, of 88 biopsies via alligator forceps, 21.6% were small, 45.5% medium, and 33% large. Corresponding results for the cup forceps were 43.2% small, 29.5% medium, and 27.3% large. From 88 biopsies taken using alligator forceps, 18.2% were found to have diagnostic value whereas in the case of cup forceps the diagnostic value was 23.9%. While no significant pneumothorax was seen with alligator forceps it was observed in 9% of the cup forceps procedures. Significant bleeding was seen in 1% of the alligator forceps and 5.7% of the cup forceps procedures. Conclusion: Comparing two types of forceps regarding the effect on results of TBLB, alligator forceps produced larger samples and less side effects. There was no significant difference in diagnostic value between two procedures.
Copyright
© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Similar Articles
Comparison of Different Techniques of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Liver in a Swine Model
Hamidian Jahromi A, Ballard DH, Bahrami R, D'Agostino HRV. Comparison of Different Techniques of Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy of Liver in a Swine Model. Hepat Mon. 2015;15(6):e26439. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.26439v2
Minithoracotomy Versus Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Wedge Resection in Interstitial Lung Diseases
Farahnak MR, Beiytsayah K, Saki N. Minithoracotomy Versus Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Wedge Resection in Interstitial Lung Diseases. Jentashapir J Cell Mol Biol. 2014;5(6):e28260. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjhr.28260
Safety and Effectiveness of Blind Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: Analysis of 1412 Procedures
Szymczak A, Szymczak A, Simon K, Simon K, Inglot M, et al. Safety and Effectiveness of Blind Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: Analysis of 1412 Procedures. Hepat Mon. 2011;12(1):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.1735143X.810
Does Repeating CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Increase Diagnostic Yield and Complication Rate? A Single Institution Experience
Yazar E, Seçik F, Yıldız P. Does Repeating CT-Guided Transthoracic Fine Needle Aspiration Increase Diagnostic Yield and Complication Rate? A Single Institution Experience. I J Radiol. 2013;10(2):56-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.10031
CT-Guided Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy for Lung Lesions: A 14-Year Review of Needle Angle and Lesion Depth
Lee JH, Lee IJ. CT-Guided Percutaneous Core Needle Biopsy for Lung Lesions: A 14-Year Review of Needle Angle and Lesion Depth. I J Radiol. 2020;17(2):e96221. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.96221
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 3 weeks ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 4 days ago
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC
Author(s):