1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Plant Material
3.2. Plantago australis Extract
3.3. Subjects
3.4. Experimental Treatment Protocol
3.5. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Demographic Aspects
4.2. Clinical Diagnosis
4.3. Clinical Evaluation
| Treatment 10% P. australis | Absolut Frequency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No Lesion and Pain | Lesion and Without Pain | Lesion and Pain | |
| Before | |||
| RAS (n = 10) | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| ELP (n = 10) | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| AC (n = 10) | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| Total (n = 30) | 0 | 7 | 23 |
| After | |||
| RAS (n = 10) | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| ELP (n = 10) | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| AC (n = 10) | 6 | 3 | 1 |
| Total (n = 30) | 22 | 3 | 5 |
| The McNemar test | - | P = 0.023 | P < 0.001 |
Abbreviations: RAS, recurrent aphthous stomatitis; ELP, erosive lichen planus; AC, actinic cheilitis.
| Treatment by 10% P. australis | RAS | ELP | AC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| After | |||
| No improvement | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Total improvement | 9 | 7 | 6 |
| The McNemar test | P = 0.008 | P = 0.023 | P = 0.041 |
Abbreviations: RAS, recurrent aphthous stomatitis; ELP, erosive lichen planus; AC, actinic cheilitis.